Literature DB >> 24488590

Physician behaviors to promote informed decisions for prostate cancer screening: a National Research Network study.

Suzanne K Linder1, Michael A Kallen, Patricia Dolan Mullen, James M Galliher, Paul R Swank, Evelyn C Y Chan, Robert J Volk.   

Abstract

Clinical guidelines for prostate cancer screening (PCS) advise physicians to discuss the potential harms and benefits of screening. However, there is a lack of training programs for informed decision-making (IDM), and it is unknown which IDM behaviors physicians have the most difficulty performing. Identifying difficult behaviors can help tailor training programs. In the context of developing a physician-IDM program for PCS, we aimed to describe physicians' use of nine key IDM behaviors for the PCS discussion and to examine the relation between the behaviors and physician characteristics. A cross-sectional sample of The American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network completed surveys about their behavior regarding PCS (N = 246; response rate = 58%). The surveys included nine physician key IDM behaviors for PCS and a single-item question describing their general practice style for PCS. The most common IDM behavior was to invite men to ask questions. The two least common reported behaviors concerned patients uncertain about screening (i.e., arrange follow-up and provide additional information for undecided men). Physicians reported difficulty with these two behaviors regardless whether they reported to discuss or not to discuss PCS with patients. Reported use of key IDM behaviors was associated with a general practice style for PCS and being affiliated with a residency-training program. Physician training programs for IDM should include physician skills to address the needs of patients uncertain about screening. Future research should determine if actual behavior is associated with self-reported behavior for the PCS discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24488590      PMCID: PMC5160960          DOI: 10.1007/s13187-014-0613-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  19 in total

Review 1.  Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems.

Authors:  Peter Briss; Barbara Rimer; Barbara Reilley; Ralph C Coates; Nancy C Lee; Patricia Mullen; Phaedra Corso; Angela B Hutchinson; Robert Hiatt; Jon Kerner; Prethibha George; Cornelia White; Nisha Gandhi; Mona Saraiya; Rosalind Breslow; George Isham; Steven M Teutsch; Alan R Hinman; Robert Lawrence
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Primary care physicians' use of an informed decision-making process for prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert J Volk; Suzanne K Linder; Michael A Kallen; James M Galliher; Mindy S Spano; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Stephen J Spann
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Discussions about prostate cancer screening between U.S. primary care physicians and their patients.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Yhenneko J Taylor; Louie E Ross; Lisa C Richardson; Thomas B Richards; Sun Hee Rim
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Measuring informed decision making about prostate cancer screening in primary care.

Authors:  Amy Leader; Constantine Daskalakis; Clarence H Braddock; Elisabeth J S Kunkel; James R Cocroft; Sylvia Bereknyei; Jeffrey M Riggio; Mark Capkin; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Does 'peer coaching' increase GP capacity to promote informed decision making about PSA screening? A cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Neil Donnelly; Nicholas Taylor; Matthew Meerkin; Geoffrey Hirst; Jeanette E Ward
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2005-04-11       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 7.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05

8.  Primary care providers' perspectives on discontinuing prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Craig E Pollack; Elizabeth A Platz; Nrupen A Bhavsar; Gary Noronha; Gene E Green; Sean Chen; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Are physicians discussing prostate cancer screening with their patients and why or why not? A pilot study.

Authors:  Carmen E Guerra; Samantha E Jacobs; John H Holmes; Judy A Shea
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.128

View more
  2 in total

1.  Informed decision making among first-degree relatives of prostate cancer survivors: a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  Stacy N Davis; Steven K Sutton; Susan T Vadaparampil; Cathy D Meade; Brian M Rivers; Mitul V Patel; Javier F Torres-Roca; Randy V Heysek; Philippe Spiess; Julio Pow-Sang; Paul B Jacobsen; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.226

2.  Feasibility Study of Engaging Barbershops for Prostate Cancer Education in Rural African-American Communities.

Authors:  John S Luque; Siddhartha Roy; Yelena N Tarasenko; Levi Ross; Jarrett Johnson; Clement K Gwede
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.