Literature DB >> 24488220

Radiographic prevalence of CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement after open reduction and internal fixation of femoral neck fractures.

G Mathew1, M Kowalczuk, B Hetaimish, A Bedi, M J Philippon, M Bhandari, N Simunovic, S Crouch, O R Ayeni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to estimate the radiographic prevalence of CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) in elderly patients (≥ 50 years) who have undergone internal fixation for femoral neck fracture.
METHODS: A total of 187 frog-leg lateral radiographs of elderly patients who underwent internal fixation for a femoral neck fracture were reviewed by two independent reviewers. The alpha angle, beta angle, and femoral head-neck offset ratio were calculated. The presence of two abnormal radiographic parameters was deemed to be diagnostic of radiographic CAM-type impingement.
RESULTS: Radiographic CAM-type FAI was identified in 157 out of 187 (84 %) patients who underwent internal fixation for fractures of the femoral neck. Moderate-to-good inter-observer reliability was achieved in the measurement of radiographic parameters. With reference to fracture subtypes and prevalence of radiographic features of CAM-type morphology, 97 (72 %) out of 134 patients were positive for CAM in Garden subtypes I and II, whereas 49 (85.9 %) out of 57 patients had radiographic CAM in Garden III and IV subtypes.
CONCLUSION: There was a high prevalence of CAM-type FAI in patients that underwent surgical fixation of femoral neck fractures. This is significantly higher than the reported prevalence in non-fracture patient populations. The high prevalence of CAM morphology could be related to several factors, including age, fracture morphology, quality of reduction, type of fixation, and fracture healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24488220     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2835-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  21 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of femoral acetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  B J Manaster; Sara Zakel
Journal:  Clin Sports Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.182

Review 2.  Femoroacetabular impingement: radiographic diagnosis--what the radiologist should know.

Authors:  Moritz Tannast; Klaus A Siebenrock; Suzanne E Anderson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The frog-leg lateral radiograph accurately visualized hip cam impingement abnormalities.

Authors:  John C Clohisy; Ryan M Nunley; Robert J Otto; Perry L Schoenecker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The evaluation of agreement on continuous variables by the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Authors:  L Prieto; R Lamarca; A Casado; J Alonso
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Prevalence of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic volunteers.

Authors:  Kalesha Hack; Gina Di Primio; Kawan Rakhra; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  A new classification for "pistol grip deformity" - correlation between the severity of the deformity and the grade of osteoarthritis of the hip.

Authors:  I Ipach; F Mittag; S Sachsenmaier; P Heinrich; T Kluba
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2010-11-15

7.  Poor results following internal fixation of displaced subcapital femoral fractures: complacency in fracture reduction.

Authors:  D H Sochart
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement.

Authors:  D Allen; P E Beaulé; O Ramadan; S Doucette
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-05

9.  The prevalence of cam-type deformity of the hip joint: a survey of 4151 subjects of the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study.

Authors:  K K Gosvig; S Jacobsen; S Sonne-Holm; P Gebuhr
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.990

10.  Femoroacetabular impingement: a resurfacing solution.

Authors:  P Brooks; B Bershadsky
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-11
View more
  5 in total

1.  Relationship between the alpha and beta angles in diagnosing CAM-type femoroacetabular impingement on frog-leg lateral radiographs.

Authors:  Moin Khan; Anil Ranawat; Dale Williams; Rajiv Gandhi; Hema Choudur; Naveen Parasu; Nicole Simunovic; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Femoroacetabular Impingement: Prevalent and Often Asymptomatic in Older Men: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Nardo; Neeta Parimi; Felix Liu; Sonia Lee; Pia M Jungmann; Michael C Nevitt; Thomas M Link; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  [Femoral neck stress fractures and femoroacetabular impingement : A retrospective case study and literature review].

Authors:  Lea Franken; Jens Goronzy; O O Olusile; Pablo Ariel Slullitel; Sophia Blum; Jörg Nowotny; Albrecht Hartmann; Falk Thielemann; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  The Natural History of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Alexander E Weber; David M Levy; Thomas H Wuerz
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-11-16

5.  Leg dominance as a risk factor for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Matthew T Philippi; Timothy L Kahn; Temitope F Adeyemi; Travis G Maak; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2020-02-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.