Literature DB >> 24488140

[Demonstration of a threshold regulation by phytochrome in the photomodulation of longitudinal growth of the hypocotyl of mustard seedlings (Sinapis alba L.)].

P Schopfer1, H Oelze-Karow.   

Abstract

The inhibition of hypocotyl lengthening in intact mustard seedlings is controlled by two photosensitive systems which can be experimentally separated. 1. Kinetics of the growth response in the dark after red and far-red irradiation (Figs. 1, 2) demonstrate the operation of Pfr in the ground state via a threshold mechanism similar to the regulation of lipoxygenase synthesis in the mustard cotyledons (c. f. ref. [27]). This threshold mechanism determines the duration of the growth inhibition (Δt) following irradiation (Fig. 1, 2). Δt is dependent on the relative Pfr concentration at the beginning of the dark period and on the half life of Pfr destruction, but it is independent of the quantum flux density of far-red light (Fig. 4). The effect of 5 min red light on Δt can be fully reversed by 5 min far-red light (Fig. 3). The data reveal a quantitative relationship between the relative Pfr concentration and the photomorphogenetic response, Δt (Fig. 6). This relationship may explain in principle the logarithmic correlation between the percentage of phytochrome converted to Pfr by an initial irradiation and the subsequent response which has also been reported in the literature. 2. In continuous far-red light the velocity constant of the steady state growth is controlled by a "high intensity reaction" which shows the usual logarithmic dependence on quantum flux density (Fig. 4, 5), but no phytochrome destruction is apparent (Fig. 2). According to Hartmann (ref.[11-13]) this "high intensity reaction" can also be attributed to Pfr, which in this case acts through some excited state, P fr (*) . It is concluded that the two photoreactive systems involve separate populations of phytochrome, which inhibit cell lengthening by independent control mechanisms.

Entities:  

Year:  1971        PMID: 24488140     DOI: 10.1007/BF00385217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  20 in total

1.  Phytochrome changes correlated to mesocotyl inhibition in etiolated Avena seedlings.

Authors:  L Loercher
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  [Photometric investigations of the phytochrome system in mustard seedlings (sinapis alba L.)].

Authors:  D Marmé
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  [The control by actinomycin D and puromycin of the phytochrome-mediated inhibition of hypocotyl lengthening in the mustard seedling (Sinapis alba L.)].

Authors:  P Schopfer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  [The inhibition of longitudinal growth by phytochrome -a process requiring substrate uptake?].

Authors:  P Schopfer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  [An action spectrum of photomorphogenesis under high energy conditions and its interpretation on the basis of phytochrome (hypocotyl growth inhibition in Lactuca sativa L)].

Authors:  K M Hartmann
Journal:  Z Naturforsch B       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 1.047

6.  Phytochrome-mediated repression of enzyme synthesis (lipoxygenase): a threshold phenomenon.

Authors:  H Oelze-Karow; P Schopfer; H Mohr
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The physiological versus the spectrophotometric status of phytochrome in corn coleoptiles.

Authors:  W R Briggs; H P Chon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Changes in photosensitive stem growth in intact peas following irradiation.

Authors:  W M Elliott; J H Miller
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Spectrophotometric Measurements of Phytochrome in vivo and Their Correlation with Photomorphogenic Responses of Phaseolus.

Authors:  W H Klein; J L Edwards; W Shropshire
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Dark Reversion of Phytochrome in Sinapis alba L.

Authors:  R E Kendrick; W S Hillman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1970-10       Impact factor: 8.340

View more
  8 in total

1.  Phytochrome-controlled extension growth of Avena sativa L. seedlings : I. Kinetic characterization of mesocotyl, coleoptile, and leaf responses.

Authors:  P Schopfer; K H Fidelak; E Schäfer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  [Phytochrome-induced regeneration of adventitious roots in the mustard seedling (Sinapis alba L.)].

Authors:  W Pfaff; P Schopfer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  [The lag-phase of the effect of 5-FUDR on the DNA-synthesis and elongation growth in Sinapis alba].

Authors:  I Capesius; M Bopp; W Clauss
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Effect of phytochrome on development of catalase activity and isoenzyme pattern in mustard (Sinapis alba L.) seedlings : A reinvestigation.

Authors:  H Drumm; P Schopfer
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Control by light of hypocotyl growth in de-etiolated mustard seedlings : I. Phytochrome as the only photoreceptor pigment.

Authors:  A Wildermann; H Drumm; E Schäfer; H Mohr
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  Control by light of hypocotyl growth in de-etiolated mustard seedlings : II. Sensitivity for newly-formed phytochrome after a light to dark transtition.

Authors:  A Wildermann; H Drumm; E Schäfer; H Mohr
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  A Deep Learning-Based Approach for High-Throughput Hypocotyl Phenotyping.

Authors:  Orsolya Dobos; Peter Horvath; Ferenc Nagy; Tivadar Danka; András Viczián
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Reversal of 5-fluorodeoxyuridine-caused growth inhibition in intact and excised etiolated hypocotyls of Sinapis alba L. by thymidine.

Authors:  M Bopp; Y P Bajaj; C E Ackermann; S Gapp
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 4.116

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.