Literature DB >> 24488054

Hysterectomy for the treatment of gynecologic malignancy.

Floor J Backes1, Jeffrey M Fowler.   

Abstract

The current literature shows that minimally invasive hysterectomy for cancer is relatively safe and provides benefits in terms of blood loss and length of stay with less or equal complication rates over laparotomy. These benefits may even be greater in the morbidly obese and those with other comorbidities. Available techniques include laparotomy, laparoscopy, single-site laparoscopy, robotics, and single-site robotics. Collection of comprehensive and reliable data on complications and outcomes will prove to be the key in defining the role of new techniques in the treatment of women with gynecologic malignancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24488054     DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  4 in total

1.  The Need for Societal Investment to Improve Cervical Cancer Outcomes in Nigeria: A commentary.

Authors:  Jonah Musa
Journal:  Afr J Reprod Health       Date:  2017-12

2.  Corneal abrasion in hysterectomy and prostatectomy: role of laparoscopic and robotic assistance.

Authors:  Ajay Sampat; Isaac Parakati; Rangesh Kunnavakkam; David B Glick; Nita K Lee; Meaghan Tenney; Scott Eggener; Steven Roth
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Survival Impacts of Perineural Invasion on Patients Under Different Radical Hysterectomies Due to Early Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Wei; Huihui Wang; Hong Zheng; Jiming Chen; Ru-Xia Shi
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Sexual function after total laparoscopic hysterectomy or transabdominal hysterectomy for benign uterine disorders: a retrospective cohort.

Authors:  Yiqun Wang; Xiaoyan Ying
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.590

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.