Literature DB >> 24488053

Hysterectomy controversies: ovarian and cervical preservation.

Vanessa L Jacoby1.   

Abstract

The decision to retain or remove the ovaries and cervix at the time of hysterectomy is complex and controversial. We present a summary of the current literature on the risks and benefits of elective oophorectomy and subtotal hysterectomy to inform surgical decision making. There are no randomized trials of oophorectomy compared with hysterectomy and ovarian preservation. Observational studies have conflicting evidence on long-term health outcomes following oophorectomy. In contrast, there are high-quality randomized trials of subtotal versus total hysterectomy; there is a decrease in some short-term surgical complications for women who undergo subtotal hysterectomy, but no differences in long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24488053     DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  3 in total

1.  Influence of ovarian-sparing surgery and ovariectomy on prognosis in early cervical adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiangxin Sheng; Yunhua Yi; Jichan Nie
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-06

2.  Chronic ovarian torsion after vaginal hysterectomy: a case with metastatic serous ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ünzüle Korkmaz; Özer Birge; Mehmet Sait Bakır; Saliha Sağnıç; Tayup Simsek
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Ovarian metastasis in women with cervical carcinoma in stages IA to IIB: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Fan; Meng-Yao Wang; Yi Mu; Si-Ping Mo; Ai Zheng; Jin-Ke Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.