Literature DB >> 24487356

Extending the statistical analysis and graphical presentation of toxicity test results using standardized effect sizes.

Michael F W Festing1.   

Abstract

The results of repeat-dose toxicity tests are usually presented as tables of means and standard deviations (SDs), with an indication of statistical significance for each biomarker. Interpretation is based mainly on the pattern of statistical significance rather than the magnitude of any response. Multiple statistical testing of many biomarkers leads to false-positive results and, with the exception of growth data, few graphical methods for showing the results are available. By converting means and SDs to standardized effect sizes, a range of graphical techniques including dot plots, line plots, box plots, and quantile-quantile plots become available to show the patterns of response. A bootstrap statistical test involving all biomarkers is proposed to compare the magnitudes of the response between treated groups. These methods are proposed as an extension rather than an alternative to current statistical analyses. They can be applied to published work retrospectively, as all that is required is tables of means and SDs. The methods are illustrated using published articles, where the results range from strong positive to completely negative responses to the test substances.
© 2014 by The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohen’s d; animal testing.; standardized effect size; statistics; toxicity testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24487356     DOI: 10.1177/0192623313517771

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Pathol        ISSN: 0192-6233            Impact factor:   1.902


  6 in total

1.  The extended statistical analysis of toxicity tests using standardised effect sizes (SESs): a comparison of nine published papers.

Authors:  Michael F W Festing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Consomic mouse strain selection based on effect size measurement, statistical significance testing and integrated behavioral z-scoring: focus on anxiety-related behavior and locomotion.

Authors:  M Labots; M C Laarakker; F Ohl; H A van Lith
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.797

3.  One-year oral toxicity study on a genetically modified maize MON810 variety in Wistar Han RCC rats (EU 7th Framework Programme project GRACE).

Authors:  Dagmar Zeljenková; Radka Aláčová; Júlia Ondrejková; Katarína Ambrušová; Mária Bartušová; Anton Kebis; Jevgenij Kovrižnych; Eva Rollerová; Elena Szabová; Soňa Wimmerová; Martin Černák; Zora Krivošíková; Miroslava Kuricová; Aurélia Líšková; Viera Spustová; Jana Tulinská; Mikuláš Levkut; Viera Révajová; Zuzana Ševčíková; Kerstin Schmidt; Jörg Schmidtke; Paul Schmidt; Jose Luis La Paz; Maria Corujo; Maria Pla; Gijs A Kleter; Esther J Kok; Jutta Sharbati; Marc Bohmer; Nils Bohmer; Ralf Einspanier; Karine Adel-Patient; Armin Spök; Annette Pöting; Christian Kohl; Ralf Wilhelm; Joachim Schiemann; Pablo Steinberg
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 5.153

4.  Enhancing the interpretation of statistical P values in toxicology studies: implementation of linear mixed models (LMMs) and standardized effect sizes (SESs).

Authors:  Kerstin Schmidt; Jörg Schmidtke; Christian Kohl; Ralf Wilhelm; Joachim Schiemann; Hilko van der Voet; Pablo Steinberg
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  Variability of control data and relevance of observed group differences in five oral toxicity studies with genetically modified maize MON810 in rats.

Authors:  Kerstin Schmidt; Jörg Schmidtke; Paul Schmidt; Christian Kohl; Ralf Wilhelm; Joachim Schiemann; Hilko van der Voet; Pablo Steinberg
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 5.153

6.  Mixed-strain housing for female C57BL/6, DBA/2, and BALB/c mice: validating a split-plot design that promotes refinement and reduction.

Authors:  Michael Walker; Carole Fureix; Rupert Palme; Jonathan A Newman; Jamie Ahloy Dallaire; Georgia Mason
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.