Literature DB >> 24486930

Standardization of morbidity assessment in breast cancer surgery using the Clavien Dindo Classification.

Peter Panhofer1, Veronika Ferenc2, Michael Schütz2, Andreas Gleiss3, Peter Dubsky2, Raimund Jakesz2, Michael Gnant2, Florian Fitzal2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There are no published data on standardized scoring systems for morbidity after breast cancer surgery. Aim of the study was to establish the Clavien Dindo Classification (CDC) as assessment tool and to identify risk factors for morbidity after breast surgery investigating new techniques including oncoplastic surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2008 and 2010, data were retrospectively evaluated from 485 women with breast cancer who underwent surgery at a university hospital. The CDC was used to assess the severity of postoperative complications. Multivariable analyses were adjusted by body-mass index, smoking, diabetes mellitus and tumour size.
RESULTS: Overall complications (CDC 1-4) were reported in 28.7%. Second surgery related to major complications (CDC 3-4) was mandatory in 4.7%. Axillary dissection was an independent predictor for CDC 1-4 in all patients (P = 0.008, OR of 1.81, 95%CI 1.17-2.82). We found no independent predictor for CDC 3-4. Oncoplastic surgery increased the rate of wound infections (P = 0.010, OR: 2.94, 95%CI 1.30-6.67) and necroses (P < 0.001, OR: 8.38, 95%CI 3.28-21.4). Axillary dissection elevated wound infection (P = 0.040, OR: 2.07, 95%CI 1.03-4.14) and seroma rates (P < 0.001, OR: 2.46, 95%CI 1.51-4.01). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no impact on morbidity.
CONCLUSION: The CDC is a valid assessment tool for future clinical trials and may be useful for hospital quality control. While axillary dissection and oncoplastic surgery raised morbidity, no single factor predicted for morbidity related second surgery.
Copyright © 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axillary dissection; Breast cancer; Clavien Dindo Classification; Complications; Morbidity; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24486930     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  10 in total

1.  Use of Clavien-Dindo classification in evaluating complications following pancreaticoduodenectomy in 1,056 cases: A retrospective analysis from one single institution.

Authors:  Wei-Guo Wang; Shah Ram Babu; Li Wang; Yang Chen; Bo-Le Tian; Hong-Bo He
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.967

2.  The iBRA-2 (immediate breast reconstruction and adjuvant therapy audit) study: protocol for a prospective national multicentre cohort study to evaluate the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the delivery of adjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Rajiv Dave; Rachel O'Connell; Tim Rattay; Zoe Tolkien; Nicola Barnes; Joanna Skillman; Paula Williamson; Elizabeth Conroy; Matthew Gardiner; Adrian Harnett; Ciara O'Brien; Jane Blazeby; Shelley Potter; Chris Holcombe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Oncological safety and cosmetic outcomes in oncoplastic breast conservation surgery, a review of the best level of evidence literature.

Authors:  Esther Jennifer Campbell; Laszlo Romics
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2017-08-04

4.  Perioperative Complications and Safety Evaluation of Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy of Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wei-Fu Chang; Ai-Jing Luo; Yi-Feng Yuan; Yang Chen; Zi-Rui Xin; Shuai-Shuai Xu
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.989

5.  Examination of Prognostic Factors Affecting Long-Term Survival of Patients with Stage 3/4 Gallbladder Cancer without Distant Metastasis.

Authors:  Ryota Higuchi; Takehisa Yazawa; Shuichirou Uemura; Yutaro Matsunaga; Takehiro Ota; Tatsuo Araida; Toru Furukawa; Masakazu Yamamoto
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Preoperative Anxiety in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Jennifer Ross Majumdar; Emily A Vertosick; Bevin Cohen; Melissa Assel; Marcia Levine; Margaret Barton-Burke
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec

7.  Cosmetic Outcomes and Symmetry Comparison in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Therapeutic Mammoplasty for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  K Gulis; L Rydén; P O Bendahl; T Svensjö
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Dual-Layer Rotation: A Versatile Therapeutic Mammoplasty Technique.

Authors:  Sarianna Joukainen; Elina Laaksonen; Ritva Vanninen; Outi Kaarela; Mazen Sudah
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.339

9.  Complications and local relapse after intraoperative low-voltage X-ray radiotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ana Alicia Tejera Hernández; Víctor Manuel Vega Benítez; Juan Carlos Rocca Cardenas; Neith Ortega Pérez; Nieves Rodriguez Ibarria; Juan Carlos Díaz Chico; Juan José García-Granados Alayón; Pedro Pérez Correa; Juan Ramón Hernández Hernández
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.766

10.  Awake breast cancer surgery: strategy in the beginning of COVID-19 emergency.

Authors:  Gianluca Vanni; Marco Pellicciaro; Marco Materazzo; Mario Dauri; Rolando Maria D'angelillo; Chiara Buonomo; Adriano De Majo; Chiara Pistolese; Ilaria Portarena; Alessandro Mauriello; Francesca Servadei; Erica Giacobbi; Agostino Chiaravalloti; Oreste Claudio Buonomo
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 4.239

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.