OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin, pyrazinamide and isoniazid in children and evaluate the adequacy of steady-state exposures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used previously published data for 76 South African children with tuberculosis to describe the population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin, pyrazinamide and isoniazid. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict steady-state exposures in children following doses in fixed-dose combination tablets in accordance with the revised guidelines. Reference exposures were derived from an ethnically similar adult population with tuberculosis taking currently recommended doses. RESULTS: The final models included allometric scaling of clearance and volume of distribution using body weight. Maturation was included for clearance of isoniazid and clearance and absorption transit time of rifampicin. For a 2-year-old child weighing 12.5 kg, the estimated typical oral clearances of rifampicin and pyrazinamide were 8.15 and 1.08 L/h, respectively. Isoniazid typical oral clearance (adjusted for bioavailability) was predicted to be 4.44, 11.6 and 14.6 L/h for slow, intermediate and fast acetylators, respectively. Higher oral clearance values in intermediate and fast acetylators also resulted from 23% lower bioavailability compared with slow acetylators. CONCLUSIONS: Simulations based on our models suggest that with the new WHO dosing guidelines and utilizing available paediatric fixed-dose combinations, children will receive adequate rifampicin exposures when compared with adults, but with a larger degree of variability. However, pyrazinamide and isoniazid exposures in many children will be lower than in adults. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in children administered the revised dosages and to optimize pragmatic approaches to dosing.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin, pyrazinamide and isoniazid in children and evaluate the adequacy of steady-state exposures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used previously published data for 76 South African children with tuberculosis to describe the population pharmacokinetics of rifampicin, pyrazinamide and isoniazid. Monte Carlo simulations were used to predict steady-state exposures in children following doses in fixed-dose combination tablets in accordance with the revised guidelines. Reference exposures were derived from an ethnically similar adult population with tuberculosis taking currently recommended doses. RESULTS: The final models included allometric scaling of clearance and volume of distribution using body weight. Maturation was included for clearance of isoniazid and clearance and absorption transit time of rifampicin. For a 2-year-old child weighing 12.5 kg, the estimated typical oral clearances of rifampicin and pyrazinamide were 8.15 and 1.08 L/h, respectively. Isoniazid typical oral clearance (adjusted for bioavailability) was predicted to be 4.44, 11.6 and 14.6 L/h for slow, intermediate and fast acetylators, respectively. Higher oral clearance values in intermediate and fast acetylators also resulted from 23% lower bioavailability compared with slow acetylators. CONCLUSIONS: Simulations based on our models suggest that with the new WHO dosing guidelines and utilizing available paediatric fixed-dose combinations, children will receive adequate rifampicin exposures when compared with adults, but with a larger degree of variability. However, pyrazinamide and isoniazid exposures in many children will be lower than in adults. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings in children administered the revised dosages and to optimize pragmatic approaches to dosing.
Entities:
Keywords:
NONMEM; anti-Mycobacterium; modelling and simulation; paediatrics; pharmacometrics
Authors: S Thee; J A Seddon; P R Donald; H I Seifart; C J Werely; A C Hesseling; B Rosenkranz; S Roll; K Magdorf; H S Schaaf Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: D P Parkin; S Vandenplas; F J Botha; M L Vandenplas; H I Seifart; P D van Helden; B J van der Walt; P R Donald; P P van Jaarsveld Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1997-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Rui Zhu; Jennifer J Kiser; Heiner I Seifart; Cedric J Werely; Charles D Mitchell; David Z D'Argenio; Courtney V Fletcher Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: A Pariente-Khayat; E Rey; D Gendrel; F Vauzelle-Kervroëdan; O Crémier; P d'Athis; J Badoual; G Olive; G Pons Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Ben Knippenberg; Madhu Page-Sharp; Sam Salman; Ben Clark; John Dyer; Kevin T Batty; Timothy M E Davis; Laurens Manning Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Kendra K Radtke; Kelly E Dooley; Peter J Dodd; Anthony J Garcia-Prats; Lindsay McKenna; Anneke C Hesseling; Radojka M Savic Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2019-07-16
Authors: Payam Nahid; Susan E Dorman; Narges Alipanah; Pennan M Barry; Jan L Brozek; Adithya Cattamanchi; Lelia H Chaisson; Richard E Chaisson; Charles L Daley; Malgosia Grzemska; Julie M Higashi; Christine S Ho; Philip C Hopewell; Salmaan A Keshavjee; Christian Lienhardt; Richard Menzies; Cynthia Merrifield; Masahiro Narita; Rick O'Brien; Charles A Peloquin; Ann Raftery; Jussi Saukkonen; H Simon Schaaf; Giovanni Sotgiu; Jeffrey R Starke; Giovanni Battista Migliori; Andrew Vernon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Claire Szipszky; Daniel Van Aartsen; Sarah Criddle; Prakruti Rao; Isaac Zentner; Museveni Justine; Estomih Mduma; Stellah Mpagama; Mohammad H Al-Shaer; Charles Peloquin; Tania A Thomas; Christopher Vinnard; Scott K Heysell Journal: J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 3.164
Authors: Stijn W van Beek; Rob Ter Heine; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar; Cecile Magis-Escurra; Rob E Aarnoutse; Elin M Svensson Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2021-02-22 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: R M Savic; R Ruslami; J E Hibma; A Hesseling; G Ramachandran; A R Ganiem; S Swaminathan; H McIlleron; A Gupta; K Thakur; R van Crevel; R Aarnoutse; K E Dooley Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 6.875