Literature DB >> 24486535

MAUDE: analysis of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery.

Elmira Manoucheri1, Noga Fuchs-Weizman2, Sarah L Cohen2, Karen C Wang2, Jon Einarsson2.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adverse events encountered during robotic gynecologic surgery, as reported to the FDA MAUDE database from January 2006 to December 2012.
DESIGN: Database search (Canadian Task Force classification III). INTERVENTION: A search of the FDA MAUDE database was performed by brand name "da Vinci" and manufacturer "Intuitive Surgical." Reports reflecting gynecologic procedures either by description or procedure name were included. A record of reports was kept to ensure that no duplicates were added. The date and type of event (operator-related error, technical system failure, or surgical injuries attributed to use of the robot) and the clinical outcome were recorded.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-six percent of reported events (n = 73) resulted in injury, and 8.5% (n = 24) resulted in death. Of note, although adnexal procedures were performed in <3% of the cohort, they accounted for 20% of the fatalities. Twenty-one percent of injuries were attributed to operator-related error, and 14% to technical system failure; 65% were not directly related to use of the robot. Fifteen deaths were reported during planned hysterectomy. Four of those were due to injury to a major blood vessel (iliac artery in 3, and aorta in 1), although a detailed description of how the injury occurred was absent from the event description.
CONCLUSION: It is important to continue to evaluate the occurrence of injuries during robot-assisted surgery in an effort to identify unique challenges associated with this advanced technology. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MAUDE; da Vinci Surgical System

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24486535     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

1.  Adverse event reporting in head and neck transoral robotic surgery: a MAUDE database study.

Authors:  Jed H Assam; Max C DeHaan; Suzanne Bakken; William C Spanos
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-01-23

2.  Adverse Events in Robotic Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 14 Years of FDA Data.

Authors:  Homa Alemzadeh; Jaishankar Raman; Nancy Leveson; Zbigniew Kalbarczyk; Ravishankar K Iyer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The learning curves of robotic and three-dimensional laparoscopic surgery in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xue-Lian Li; Dan-Feng Du; Hua Jiang
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 4.207

4.  Understanding the surgeon's behaviour during robot-assisted surgery: protocol for the qualitative Behav'Robot study.

Authors:  Clément Cormi; Guillaume Parpex; Camille Julio; Fiona Ecarnot; David Laplanche; Geoffrey Vannieuwenhuyse; Antoine Duclos; Stéphane Sanchez
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Novel surgical techniques, regenerative medicine, tissue engineering and innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Maciej Nowacki; Łukasz Nazarewski; Tomasz Kloskowski; Dominik Tyloch; Marta Pokrywczyńska; Katarzyna Pietkun; Arkadiusz Jundziłł; Janusz Tyloch; Samy L Habib; Tomasz Drewa
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.318

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.