Andrea L DeMaria1, Marissa Flores2, Jacqueline M Hirth2, Abbey B Berenson2. 1. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX; Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC. 2. Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Women's Health and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prevalence and correlates of complications related to pubic hair removal among a diverse clinical sample of women attending a public clinic. STUDY DESIGN: Women (aged 16-40 years) who received care from April to June 2012 at 2 publicly funded clinics completed an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire (n = 369). After excluding women with missing data, analyses were conducted on 333 women. Additional measures were retrieved through a medical chart review. A χ(2) and a multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze participant characteristics, pubic hair removal behaviors, and complications related to pubic hair removal. RESULTS: Most women (87%) admitted to current removal of at least some pubic hair, whereas the remainder responded that they had removed pubic hair in the past. Under- or normal-weight women were more likely to report total pubic hair removal than overweight or obese women. The majority (60%) had experienced at least 1 health complication because of the removal, of which the most common were epidermal abrasion and ingrown hairs. Black and Hispanic women were less likely than white women to report complications. Overweight or obese women were almost twice as likely to report a complication and almost 3 times as likely if they also had total hair removal. Only 4% had seen a health care provider for a complication related to hair removal and only 4% discussed safe removal practices with their doctor. CONCLUSION: Minor complications commonly occur as a result of pubic hair removal. Gynecological visits could provide a safe environment for women to discuss pubic hair removal practices. Published by Mosby, Inc.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the prevalence and correlates of complications related to pubic hair removal among a diverse clinical sample of women attending a public clinic. STUDY DESIGN:Women (aged 16-40 years) who received care from April to June 2012 at 2 publicly funded clinics completed an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire (n = 369). After excluding women with missing data, analyses were conducted on 333 women. Additional measures were retrieved through a medical chart review. A χ(2) and a multivariable logistic regression were used to analyze participant characteristics, pubic hair removal behaviors, and complications related to pubic hair removal. RESULTS: Most women (87%) admitted to current removal of at least some pubic hair, whereas the remainder responded that they had removed pubic hair in the past. Under- or normal-weight women were more likely to report total pubic hair removal than overweight or obesewomen. The majority (60%) had experienced at least 1 health complication because of the removal, of which the most common were epidermal abrasion and ingrown hairs. Black and Hispanic women were less likely than white women to report complications. Overweight or obesewomen were almost twice as likely to report a complication and almost 3 times as likely if they also had total hair removal. Only 4% had seen a health care provider for a complication related to hair removal and only 4% discussed safe removal practices with their doctor. CONCLUSION: Minor complications commonly occur as a result of pubic hair removal. Gynecological visits could provide a safe environment for women to discuss pubic hair removal practices. Published by Mosby, Inc.
Authors: Claire Dendle; Sheila Mulvey; Felicity Pyrlis; M Lindsay Grayson; Paul D R Johnson Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Debby Herbenick; Devon Hensel; Nicole K Smith; Vanessa Schick; Michael Reece; Stephanie A Sanders; J Dennis Fortenberry Journal: J Sex Med Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 3.802
Authors: Allison S Glass; Herman S Bagga; Gregory E Tasian; Patrick B Fisher; Charles E McCulloch; Sarah D Blaschko; Jack W McAninch; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: Urology Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Thomas W Gaither; Mohannad A Awad; E Charles Osterberg; Tami S Rowen; Alan W Shindel; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: Am J Mens Health Date: 2016-08-01
Authors: Matthew D Truesdale; E Charles Osterberg; Thomas W Gaither; Mohannad A Awad; Molly A Elmer-DeWitt; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Isabel Allen; Benjamin N Breyer Journal: JAMA Dermatol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 10.282
Authors: Thais Chimati Felix; Lúcio Borges de Araújo; Denise Von Dolinger de Brito Röder; Reginaldo Dos Santos Pedroso Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2020-01-30