| Literature DB >> 24486123 |
Nanna Maaløe1, Anna J M Aabakke2, Niels J Secher3.
Abstract
While transverse incision is the recommended entry technique for cesarean delivery in high-income countries, it is our experience that midline incision is still used routinely in many low-income settings. Accordingly, international guidelines lack uniformity on this matter. Although evidence is limited, the literature suggests important advantages of the transverse incision, with lower risk of long-term disabilities such as wound disruption and hernia. Also, potential extra time spent on this incision appears not to impact neonatal outcome. Therefore, we suggest that it is time for a change in guidelines for low-income settings in which resources are limited for treating complications that may be life threatening.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse effects; Cesarean delivery; Delivery; Methods; Midline; Obstetric; Transverse; Women
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24486123 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.09.030
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet ISSN: 0020-7292 Impact factor: 3.561