Giorgio Gandaglia1, Ioana Popa2, Firas Abdollah3, Jonas Schiffmann4, Shahrokh F Shariat5, Alberto Briganti3, Francesco Montorsi3, Quoc-Dien Trinh6, Pierre I Karakiewicz2, Maxine Sun7. 1. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: giorgio.gandaglia@gmail.com. 2. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Urology, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. 3. Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. 4. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Martini-clinic, Prostate Cancer Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany. 5. Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 6. Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. 7. Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although therapeutic guidelines recommend the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in patients who have muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), this approach remains largely underused. One of the main reasons for this phenomenon might reside in concerns regarding the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those treated with RC alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Relying on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare-linked database, 3760 patients diagnosed with MIBC between 2000 and 2009 were evaluated. INTERVENTION: RC alone or RC plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Complications occurred within 30 and 90 d after surgery. Heterologous blood transfusions (HBTs), length of stay (LoS), readmission, and perioperative mortality were compared. To decrease the effect of unmeasured confounders associated with treatment selection, propensity score-matched analyses were performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 416 (11.1%) of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Following propensity score matching, 416 (20%) and 1664 (80%) patients treated with RC plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RC alone remained, respectively. The 30-d complication, readmission, and mortality rates were 66.0%, 32.2%, and 5.3%, respectively. The 90-d complication, readmission, and mortality rates were 72.5%, 46.6%, and 8.2%, respectively. When patients were stratified according to neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, no significant differences were observed in the rates of complications, HBT, prolonged LoS, readmission, and mortality between the two groups (all p ≥ 0.1). These results were confirmed in multivariate analyses, where the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with higher risk of 30- and 90-d complications, HBT, prolonged LoS, readmission, and mortality (all p ≥ 0.1). Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with higher perioperative morbidity or mortality. These results should encourage wider use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy when clinically indicated. PATIENT SUMMARY: Chemotherapy before radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer does not increase the risk of complications or death. The use of chemotherapy should be strongly encouraged, as recommended by clinical guidelines, given its benefits.
BACKGROUND: Although therapeutic guidelines recommend the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in patients who have muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), this approach remains largely underused. One of the main reasons for this phenomenon might reside in concerns regarding the risk of morbidity and mortality associated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative outcomes between patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those treated with RC alone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Relying on the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare-linked database, 3760 patients diagnosed with MIBC between 2000 and 2009 were evaluated. INTERVENTION: RC alone or RC plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Complications occurred within 30 and 90 d after surgery. Heterologous blood transfusions (HBTs), length of stay (LoS), readmission, and perioperative mortality were compared. To decrease the effect of unmeasured confounders associated with treatment selection, propensity score-matched analyses were performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 416 (11.1%) of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Following propensity score matching, 416 (20%) and 1664 (80%) patients treated with RC plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RC alone remained, respectively. The 30-d complication, readmission, and mortality rates were 66.0%, 32.2%, and 5.3%, respectively. The 90-d complication, readmission, and mortality rates were 72.5%, 46.6%, and 8.2%, respectively. When patients were stratified according to neoadjuvant chemotherapy status, no significant differences were observed in the rates of complications, HBT, prolonged LoS, readmission, and mortality between the two groups (all p ≥ 0.1). These results were confirmed in multivariate analyses, where the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with higher risk of 30- and 90-d complications, HBT, prolonged LoS, readmission, and mortality (all p ≥ 0.1). Our study is limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is not associated with higher perioperative morbidity or mortality. These results should encourage wider use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy when clinically indicated. PATIENT SUMMARY: Chemotherapy before radical cystectomy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer does not increase the risk of complications or death. The use of chemotherapy should be strongly encouraged, as recommended by clinical guidelines, given its benefits.
Authors: Uros Milenkovic; Murat Akand; Lisa Moris; Liesbeth Demaegd; Tim Muilwijk; Youri Bekhuis; Annouschka Laenen; Ben Van Cleynenbreugel; Wouter Everaerts; Hein Van Poppel; Herlinde Dumez; Maarten Albersen; Steven Joniau Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Ettore Di Trapani; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Giorgio Gandaglia; Lorenzo Rocchini; Marco Moschini; Daphne Lizee; Arie Carneiro; Arjun Sivaraman; Eric Barret; François Rozet; Marc Galiano; Mostefa Bennamoun; Renzo Colombo; Nazareno Suardi; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Xavier Cathelineau Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Girish S Kulkarni; Peter C Black; Srikala S Sridhar; Anil Kapoor; Alexandre R Zlotta; Bobby Shayegan; Ricardo A Rendon; Peter Chung; Theodorus van der Kwast; Nimira Alimohamed; Yves Fradet; Wassim Kassouf Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Homayoun Zargar; Patrick N Espiritu; Adrian S Fairey; Laura S Mertens; Colin P Dinney; Maria C Mir; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Michael S Cookson; Niels-Erik Jacobsen; Nilay M Gandhi; Joshua Griffin; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Nikhil Vasdev; Evan Y Yu; David Youssef; Evanguelos Xylinas; Nicholas J Campain; Wassim Kassouf; Marc A Dall'Era; Jo-An Seah; Cesar E Ercole; Simon Horenblas; Srikala S Sridhar; John S McGrath; Jonathan Aning; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jonathan L Wright; Andrew C Thorpe; Todd M Morgan; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Scott North; Daniel A Barocas; Yair Lotan; Jorge A Garcia; Andrew J Stephenson; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Giorgio Gandaglia; Briony Varda; Akshay Sood; Daniel Pucheril; Ramdev Konijeti; Jesse D Sammon; Shyam Sukumar; Mani Menon; Maxine Sun; Steven L Chang; Francesco Montorsi; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Peter S Kirk; Ted A Skolarus; Bruce L Jacobs; Yongmei Qin; Benjamin Li; Michael Sessine; Xiang Liu; Kevin Zhu; Scott M Gilbert; Brent K Hollenbeck; Ken Urish; Jonathan Helm; Mariel S Lavieri; Tudor Borza Journal: BJU Int Date: 2019-08-11 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Meera R Chappidi; Max Kates; C J Stimson; Michael H Johnson; Phillip M Pierorazio; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-08-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Pranav Sharma; Carl H Henriksen; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari; Ren Xin; Michael A Poch; Julio M Pow-Sang; Wade J Sexton; Philippe E Spiess; Scott M Gilbert Journal: J Urol Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 7.450