Literature DB >> 24486003

Biomolecular dynamics and binding studies in the living cell.

Stephan Diekmann1, Christian Hoischen1.   

Abstract

Isolation and preparation of proteins of higher organisms often is a tedious task. In the case of success, the properties of these proteins and their interactions with other proteins can be studied in vitro. If however, these proteins are modified in the cell in order to gain or change function, this is non-trivial to correctly realise in vitro. When, furthermore, the cellular function requires the interplay of more than one or two proteins, in vitro experiments for the analysis of this situation soon become complex. Instead, we thus try to obtain information on the molecular properties of proteins in the living cell. Then, the cell takes care of correct protein folding and modification. A series of molecular techniques are, and new ones become, available which allow for measuring molecular protein properties in the living cell, offering information on concentration (FCS), dynamics (FCS, RICS, FRAP), location (PALM, STED), interactions (F3H, FCCS) and protein proximities (FRET, BRET, FLIM, BiFC). Here, these techniques are presented with their advantages and drawbacks, with examples from our current kinetochore research. The review is supposed to give orientation to researchers planning to enter the field, and inform which techniques help us to gain molecular information on a multi-protein complex. We show that the field of cellular imaging is in a phase of transition: in the future, an increasing amount of physico-chemical data can be determined in the living cell.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamics; Fluorescence microscopy; Live cell imaging; Protein–protein interaction; Proximity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24486003     DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Life Rev        ISSN: 1571-0645            Impact factor:   11.025


  11 in total

Review 1.  Principles and Overview of Sampling Methods for Modeling Macromolecular Structure and Dynamics.

Authors:  Tatiana Maximova; Ryan Moffatt; Buyong Ma; Ruth Nussinov; Amarda Shehu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  The CENP-T C-terminus is exclusively proximal to H3.1 and not to H3.2 or H3.3.

Authors:  Christian Abendroth; Antje Hofmeister; Sandra B Hake; Paul K Kamweru; Elke Miess; Carsten Dornblut; Isabell Küffner; Wen Deng; Heinrich Leonhardt; Sandra Orthaus; Christian Hoischen; Stephan Diekmann
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Function of metabolic and organelle networks in crowded and organized media.

Authors:  Miguel A Aon; Sonia Cortassa
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  CENP-C/H/I/K/M/T/W/N/L and hMis12 but not CENP-S/X participate in complex formation in the nucleoplasm of living human interphase cells outside centromeres.

Authors:  Christian Hoischen; Sibel Yavas; Thorsten Wohland; Stephan Diekmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Multimodal Light Microscopy Approaches to Reveal Structural and Functional Properties of Promyelocytic Leukemia Nuclear Bodies.

Authors:  Christian Hoischen; Shamci Monajembashi; Klaus Weisshart; Peter Hemmerich
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  GRK Mediates μ-Opioid Receptor Plasma Membrane Reorganization.

Authors:  Arisbel B Gondin; Michelle L Halls; Meritxell Canals; Stephen J Briddon
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.639

7.  Brightness-gated two-color coincidence detection unravels two distinct mechanisms in bacterial protein translation initiation.

Authors:  Henning Höfig; Olessya Yukhnovets; Cristina Remes; Noemie Kempf; Alexandros Katranidis; Daryan Kempe; Jörg Fitter
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 8.  Targeting protein function: the expanding toolkit for conditional disruption.

Authors:  Amy E Campbell; Daimark Bennett
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Dependence of fluorescent protein brightness on protein concentration in solution and enhancement of it.

Authors:  Takamitsu J Morikawa; Hideaki Fujita; Akira Kitamura; Takashi Horio; Johtaro Yamamoto; Masataka Kinjo; Akira Sasaki; Hiroaki Machiyama; Keiko Yoshizawa; Taro Ichimura; Katsumi Imada; Takeharu Nagai; Tomonobu M Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  The use of fluorescence correlation spectroscopy to characterize the molecular mobility of fluorescently labelled G protein-coupled receptors.

Authors:  Laura E Kilpatrick; Stephen J Hill
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 5.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.