| Literature DB >> 24485271 |
Hugues Zrounba1, Jean-Christophe Lutz2, Simone Zink2, Astrid Wilk2.
Abstract
Surgical management of mandibular condyle fractures is still controversial. Although it provides better outcome than closed treatment questions still remain about the surgical approach and the osteosynthesis devices to be used. Between 2005 and 2010, we managed 168 mandibular condyle fractures with open treatment. Two surgical approaches were used in this study, a pre-auricular and a high submandibular approach (one or the other or as a combined approach). Internal fixation was performed using TCP(®) plates (Medartis, Basel, Switzerland) or with two lag screws (15 and 17 mm). Delta plates were used in 15 cases (8.9%). We report the epidemiology of these fractures and the outcomes of the surgical treatment. We assessed the complications related to the surgical procedure and those related to the osteosynthesis material. The facial nerve related complication rate was very low and the osteosynthesis materials used proved to be strong enough to realize a stable fixation. The two approaches used in this study appeared to be safe with good aesthetic results. Most of the surgical procedure failures occurred in high subcondylar fractures especially when bilateral.Entities:
Keywords: Condyle; Fracture; Mandibular; Osteosynthesis; Surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24485271 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Craniomaxillofac Surg ISSN: 1010-5182 Impact factor: 2.078