Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen1, Huub A A M Maas2, Caro C E Koning3, Brigitte A H A van der Bruggen-Bogaarts4, Harry J M Groen5, A N Machteld Wymenga6. 1. Department of Research, Eindhoven Cancer Registry, Comprehensive Cancer Centre South, P.O. Box 231, 5600 AE, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Epidemiology, VieCuri Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1926, 5900 BX, Venlo, The Netherlands. Electronic address: research@viecuri.nl. 2. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Tweesteden Hospital, P.O. Box 90107, 5000 LA, Tilburg, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pulmonary Diseases, VieCuri Medical Centre, P.O. Box 1926, 5900 BX, Venlo, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Medical Spectrum Twente, P.O. Box 50.000, 7500 KA, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Over 20% of all newly diagnosed Dutch patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are aged ≥75 years. Uncertainties still exist about safety and efficacy of chemotherapy and chemoradiation in elderly patients. We evaluated the association between patient characteristics and (completion of) treatment and also evaluated toxicity, response and survival in elderly patients with SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Population-based data from patients aged 75 years or older and diagnosed with limited SCLC in 1997-2004 in The Netherlands were used (N = 368). Additional data on co-morbidity, motive for deviating from guidelines, grades 3-5 toxicity, response and survival were gathered from medical records. RESULTS: Although only relatively fit elderly were selected for chemotherapy, almost 70% developed toxicity, leading to early termination of chemotherapy in over half of all patients. Median survival time was 6.7 months, but differed strongly according to type and completion of treatment (13.5 months for chemoradiation, 7.1 months for chemotherapy, 2.9 months for best supportive care, 11.5 months for patients receiving at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy and 3.6 months for less than 4 cycles). CONCLUSION: Although toxicity rate was high and many patients could not complete the full chemotherapy, those who received chemotherapy or chemoradiation had a significantly better survival. We hypothesize that a better selection by proper geriatric assessments is needed to achieve a more favourable balance between benefit and harm.
OBJECTIVES: Over 20% of all newly diagnosed Dutch patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are aged ≥75 years. Uncertainties still exist about safety and efficacy of chemotherapy and chemoradiation in elderly patients. We evaluated the association between patient characteristics and (completion of) treatment and also evaluated toxicity, response and survival in elderly patients with SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Population-based data from patients aged 75 years or older and diagnosed with limited SCLC in 1997-2004 in The Netherlands were used (N = 368). Additional data on co-morbidity, motive for deviating from guidelines, grades 3-5 toxicity, response and survival were gathered from medical records. RESULTS: Although only relatively fit elderly were selected for chemotherapy, almost 70% developed toxicity, leading to early termination of chemotherapy in over half of all patients. Median survival time was 6.7 months, but differed strongly according to type and completion of treatment (13.5 months for chemoradiation, 7.1 months for chemotherapy, 2.9 months for best supportive care, 11.5 months for patients receiving at least 4 cycles of chemotherapy and 3.6 months for less than 4 cycles). CONCLUSION: Although toxicity rate was high and many patients could not complete the full chemotherapy, those who received chemotherapy or chemoradiation had a significantly better survival. We hypothesize that a better selection by proper geriatric assessments is needed to achieve a more favourable balance between benefit and harm.
Authors: Karlijn J G Schulkes; Carin A M Pouw; Elisabeth J M Driessen; Leontine J R van Elden; Frederiek van den Bos; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Marije E Hamaker Journal: Lung Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Umit Tapan; Vanessa Fiorini Furtado; Muhammad Mustafa Qureshi; Peter Everett; Kei Suzuki; Kimberley S Mak Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep Date: 2020-10-20
Authors: Marta Soares; Luís Antunes; Patrícia Redondo; Marina Borges; Fiona Grimson; Ruben Hermans; Carlos Chaib; Laure Lacoin; Ariadna Juarez-Garcia; Melinda J Daumont; John R Penrod; Maria José Bento; Francisco Rocha Gonçalves Journal: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 2.328