Literature DB >> 24483976

[Study of two variants of nutritional risk score “NUTRIC” in ventilated critical patients].

Dino Moretti1, Daniel Horacio Bagilet, Martín Buncuga, Claudio Jesús Settecase, Marta Beatriz Quaglino, Rosana Quintana.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The NUTRIC score was proposed to assess the risk of adverse events potentially modifiable through nutritional intervention in critically ill patients. This score uses interleukin-6 (IL-6), a biomarker not always available.
OBJECTIVE: To study two variants of the score in patients with assisted mechanical ventilation (AMV): NUTRIC-1 without IL-6 and NUTRIC-2 with CRP as biomarker.
METHODS: Observational prospective cohort with 368 patients with AMV >24 hours. The predictive capacity of both NUTRIC scores was studied by binary logistic regression. The significance level was set at 5%.
RESULTS: mean age, 52 years; males 68%. Mean APACHE II score: 20.73 points. Death at the ICU: 196 (53%). Mean time on AMV of the survivals: 8.55 days. Mean NUTRIC-1 and NUTRIC-2 in the deceased-survivors: 4.23 - 3.06 (p = 0.000) and 4.68 -3.39 (p = 0.000). The mortality increased in relation to the score (p = 0.000). The calculated AUC for NUTRIC-1 and NUTRIC-2 were 0.671 (CI 0.617-0.726) and 0.679 (CI 0.624- 0.733). The mean CRP was higher in deceased patients: 13.07 mg/dL - 8.97 mg/dL (p = 0.001), the correlation improved with more days on AMV (p = 0.034 and p = 0.010) and the AUC increased in a similar way to IL-6 in the original work (0.008 and 0.007, respectively).
CONCLUSION: The two studied variants of the NUTRIC score behaved similarly to the original NUTRIC score. The addition of the CRP improves the score performance and may be an alternative to IL-6, if it is not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24483976     DOI: 10.3305/nh.2014.29.1.7001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Hosp        ISSN: 0212-1611            Impact factor:   1.057


  7 in total

Review 1.  Can Nutritional Assessment Tools Predict Response to Nutritional Therapy?

Authors:  Chirag Patel; Endashaw Omer; Sarah J Diamond; Stephen A McClave
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-04

2.  Use of Nutrition Risk in Critically ill (NUTRIC) Score to Assess Nutritional Risk in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  M S Kalaiselvan; M K Renuka; A S Arunkumar
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-05

3.  Modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) Score to Assess Nutritional Risk in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: A Prospective Observational Study from the Pakistani Population.

Authors:  Hafiz Muhammad Ata Ur-Rehman; Wasib Ishtiaq; Muhammad Yousaf; Sheher Bano; Abdul Malik Mujahid; Aftab Akhtar
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-12-27

4.  NUTRIC score use around the world: a systematic review.

Authors:  Audrey Machado Dos Reis; Ana Valéria Gonçalves Fructhenicht; Luis Fernando Moreira
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2019-10-14

5.  Value of the urea/creatinine index in isolated urine to estimate severe protein hypercatabolism in ventilated patients.

Authors:  Dino Moretti; Melisa D Ré; Nicolás Sebastián Rocchetti; Daniel H Bagilet; Claudio Jesús Settecase; Martin G Buncuga; Marta B Quaglino
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

6.  To: Complementary of modified NUTRIC score with or without C-reactive protein and subjective global assessment in predicting mortality in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Dino Moretti; Nicolás Sebastián Rocchetti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec

7.  Complementarity of modified NUTRIC score with or without C-reactive protein and subjective global assessment in predicting mortality in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Manoela Lima Oliveira; Daren Keith Heyland; Flávia Moraes Silva; Estela Iraci Rabito; Mariane Rosa; Micheli da Silva Tarnowski; Daieni Fernandes; Aline Marcadenti
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.