Literature DB >> 24483480

Teardrop shapes minimize bending energy of fusion pores connecting planar bilayers.

Rolf J Ryham1, Mark A Ward1, Fredric S Cohen2.   

Abstract

A numerical gradient flow procedure was devised to characterize minimal energy shapes of fusion pores connecting two parallel planar bilayer membranes. Pore energy, composed of splay, tilt, and stretching, was obtained by modeling each bilayer as two monolayers and treating each monolayer of a bilayer membrane as a freely deformable surface described with a mean lipid orientation field. Voids between the two monolayers were prevented by a steric penalty formulation. Pore shapes were assumed to possess both axial and reflectional symmetry. For fixed pore radius and bilayer separation, the gradient flow procedure was applied to initially toroidal pore shapes. Using initially elliptical pore shapes yielded the same final shape. The resulting minimal pore shapes and energies were analyzed as a function of pore dimension and lipid composition. Previous studies either assumed or confined pore shapes, thereby tacitly supplying an unspecified amount of energy to maintain shape. The shapes derived in the present study were outputs of calculations and an externally provided energy was not supplied. Our procedure therefore yielded energy minima significantly lower than those reported in prior studies. The membrane of minimal energy pores bowed outward near the pore lumen, yielding a pore length that exceeded the distance between the two fusing membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24483480      PMCID: PMC4343043          DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.062701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  22 in total

Review 1.  From structure to function in open ionic channels.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 1.843

2.  Dynamics of fusion pores connecting membranes of different tensions.

Authors:  Y A Chizmadzhev; P I Kuzmin; D A Kumenko; J Zimmerberg; F S Cohen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Stalk model of membrane fusion: solution of energy crisis.

Authors:  Yonathan Kozlovsky; Michael M Kozlov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Dynamics of orientational ordering in fluid membranes.

Authors:  Nariya Uchida
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2002-10-30

5.  Entropy-driven tension and bending elasticity in condensed-fluid membranes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  1990-04-23       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Continuum theory of a moving membrane.

Authors:  Dan Hu; Pingwen Zhang; Weinan E
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2007-04-26

Review 7.  Computing the field in proteins and channels.

Authors:  R S Eisenberg
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  A comparison of coarse-grained and continuum models for membrane bending in lipid bilayer fusion pores.

Authors:  Jejoong Yoo; Meyer B Jackson; Qiang Cui
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  The influence of lysolipids on the spontaneous curvature and bending elasticity of phospholipid membranes.

Authors:  N Fuller; R P Rand
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Dynamics of multicomponent vesicles in a viscous fluid.

Authors:  Jin Sun Sohn; Yu-Hau Tseng; Shuwang Li; Axel Voigt; John S Lowengrub
Journal:  J Comput Phys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.553

View more
  10 in total

1.  Free energy landscape of rim-pore expansion in membrane fusion.

Authors:  Herre Jelger Risselada; Yuliya Smirnova; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  SNARE-mediated membrane fusion arrests at pore expansion to regulate the volume of an organelle.

Authors:  Massimo D'Agostino; Herre Jelger Risselada; Laura J Endter; Véronique Comte-Miserez; Andreas Mayer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Calculating Transition Energy Barriers and Characterizing Activation States for Steps of Fusion.

Authors:  Rolf J Ryham; Thomas S Klotz; Lihan Yao; Fredric S Cohen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  How Viruses Invade Cells.

Authors:  Fredric S Cohen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  A tethering complex drives the terminal stage of SNARE-dependent membrane fusion.

Authors:  Massimo D'Agostino; Herre Jelger Risselada; Anna Lürick; Christian Ungermann; Andreas Mayer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Fusion Pore Expansion and Contraction during Catecholamine Release from Endocrine Cells.

Authors:  Meyer B Jackson; Yu-Tien Hsiao; Che-Wei Chang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Palmitoylation Contributes to Membrane Curvature in Influenza A Virus Assembly and Hemagglutinin-Mediated Membrane Fusion.

Authors:  Petr Chlanda; Elena Mekhedov; Hang Waters; Alexander Sodt; Cindi Schwartz; Vinod Nair; Paul S Blank; Joshua Zimmerberg
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  The neuronal calcium sensor Synaptotagmin-1 and SNARE proteins cooperate to dilate fusion pores.

Authors:  Nadiv Dharan; Zachary A McDargh; Sathish Thiyagarajan; Zhenyong Wu; Ben O'Shaughnessy; Erdem Karatekin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 9.  Fusion pores and their control of neurotransmitter and hormone release.

Authors:  Che-Wei Chang; Chung-Wei Chiang; Meyer B Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 4.086

10.  Elastic deformations of bolalipid membranes.

Authors:  Timur R Galimzyanov; Peter I Kuzmin; Peter Pohl; Sergey A Akimov
Journal:  Soft Matter       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 3.679

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.