| Literature DB >> 24482599 |
Norman Oliva1, Prabhjit Chadha-Mohanty1, Susanna Poletti1, Editha Abrigo1, Genelou Atienza1, Lina Torrizo1, Ruby Garcia1, Conrado Dueñas1, Mar Aristeo Poncio1, Jeanette Balindong1, Marina Manzanilla1, Florencia Montecillo1, Maricris Zaidem2, Gerard Barry1, Philippe Hervé3, Huxia Shou4, Inez H Slamet-Loedin1.
Abstract
Biofortification of rice (Oryza sativa L.) using a transgenic approach to increase the amount of iron in the grain is proposed as a low-cost, reliable, and sustainable solution to help developing countries combat anemia. In this study, we generated and evaluated a large number of rice or soybean ferritin over-accumulators in rice mega-variety IR64, including marker-free events, by introducing soybean or rice ferritin genes into the endosperm for product development. Accumulation of the protein was confirmed by ELISA, in situ immunological detection, and Western blotting. As much as a 37- and 19-fold increase in the expression of ferritin gene in single and co-transformed plants, respectively, and a 3.4-fold increase in Fe content in the grain over the IR64 wild type was achieved using this approach. Agronomic characteristics of a total of 1,860 progenies from 58 IR64 single independent transgenic events and 768 progenies from 27 marker-free transgenic events were evaluated and most trait characteristics did not show a penalty. Grain quality evaluation of high-Fe IR64 transgenic events showed quality similar to that of the wild-type IR64. To understand the effect of transgenes on iron homeostasis, transcript analysis was conducted on a subset of genes involved in iron uptake and loading. Gene expression of the exogenous ferritin gene in grain correlates with protein accumulation and iron concentration. The expression of NAS2 and NAS3 metal transporters increased during the grain milky stage.Entities:
Keywords: Agronomic evaluation; Marker-free; Rice ferritin; Soybean ferritin; Transgenic rice
Year: 2013 PMID: 24482599 PMCID: PMC3890568 DOI: 10.1007/s11032-013-9931-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Breed ISSN: 1380-3743 Impact factor: 2.589
Transformation efficiencies and molecular analysis data of single transformed (A) and co-transformed (B) IR64 with different promoter::ferritin gene constructs
| Construct | T0 | Single copy (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gene | Promoter | Total | Transformation efficiency (%)a | |
| (A) | ||||
| |
| 148 | 20.8 | 71.3 |
| |
| 63 | 10.8 | 75.0 |
| |
| 179 | 38.1 | 50.5 |
| |
| 55 | 18.3 | 75.0 |
| |
| 132 | 14.3 | 75.5 |
| |
| 57 | 19.5 | 56.8 |
| |
| 57 | 16.0 | 86.7 |
aTransformation efficiency was computed based on percentage of PCR-GOI-positive plants over number of transferred immature embryos
bMarker-free genotype
Statistical analysis of agronomic characteristics of transgenic events in IR64 background using different constructs encoding for the ferritin gene and its null counterpart
| Plant type | Seed weight per plant | Plant height | Tiller number | Panicle length | Panicle number | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| g |
| cm |
| no. |
| cm |
| no. | |
|
| ||||||||||
| IR64 wild type | 474 | 13.15 ± 0.29A | 354 | 106.71 ± 2.72A | 354 | 8.05 ± 0.18B | 1,657 | 23.21 ± 0.08B | 354 | 8.15 ± 0.22B |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 131 | 14.94 ± 0.53A | 97 | 101.56 ± 0.48A | 97 | 10.99 ± 0.36A | 484 | 25.02 ± 0.48A | 97 | 10.81 ± 0.35AB |
| N | 48 | 15.99 ± 0.93A | 38 | 101.33 ± 0.81A | 38 | 9.87 ± 0.49AB | 189 | 24.46 ± 0.23AB | 38 | 9.69 ± 0.50AB |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 165 | 14.38 ± 0.43A | 144 | 100.17 ± 0.59A | 144 | 9.99 ± 0.26AB | 715 | 23.50 ± 0.12AB | 144 | 9.79 ± 0.26AB |
| N | 69 | 14.72 ± 0.76A | 60 | 99.13 ± 1.21A | 60 | 9.71 ± 0.45AB | 298 | 23.78 ± 0.18AB | 60 | 9.66 ± 0.45AB |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 140 | 12.60 ± 0.62A | 111 | 99.12 ± 0.66A | 111 | 10.57 ± 0.39AB | 552 | 24.43 ± 0.48AB | 111 | 10.43 ± 0.39AB |
| N | 54 | 13.30 ± 0.95A | 44 | 99.76 ± 0.80A | 44 | 9.61 ± 0.50AB | 218 | 24.01 ± 0.25AB | 44 | 9.40 ± 0.49AB |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 160 | 15.60 ± 0.62A | 146 | 100.54 ± 0.69A | 146 | 10.92 ± 0.32A | 718 | 23.93 ± 0.19AB | 146 | 10.81 ± 0.32AB |
| N | 63 | 15.93 ± 1.05A | 57 | 101.32 ± 0.79A | 57 | 9.93 ± 0.45AB | 282 | 23.89 ± 0.21AB | 57 | 9.79 ± 0.46AB |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 144 | 14.61 ± 0.54A | 133 | 98.65 ± 0.49A | 133 | 11.80 ± 0.32A | 664 | 23.87 ± 0.33AB | 133 | 11.66 ± 0.34A |
| N | 60 | 16.30 ± 0.92A | 54 | 97.96 ± 1.09A | 54 | 11.67 ± 0.81A | 265 | 23.88 ± 0.23AB | 54 | 12.51 ± 1.92A |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 104 | 17.00 ± 0.71A | 90 | 102.01 ± 0.40A | 90 | 11.54 ± 0.40A | 449 | 24.40 ± 0.13AB | 90 | 12.00 ± 0.75A |
| N | 44 | 17.63 ± 1.19A | 38 | 102.08 ± 0.61A | 38 | 11.27 ± 0.63AB | 188 | 24.24 ± 0.26AB | 38 | 11.02 ± 0.63AB |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 164 | 16.01 ± 0.52A | 147 | 102.49 ± 0.30A | 147 | 10.46 ± 0.28AB | 727 | 24.51 ± 0.12AB | 147 | 10.24 ± 0.28AB |
| N | 67 | 17.30 ± 1.00A | 60 | 102.09 ± 0.43A | 60 | 10.60 ± 0.48AB | 294 | 24.64 ± 0.17AB | 60 | 10.39 ± 0.47AB |
|
| ||||||||||
| IR64 wild type | 75 | 13.43 ± 1.98A | 28 | 99.47 ± 0.97A | 103 | 10.76 ± 1.94B | 141 | 21.44 ± 1.99A | 98 | 10.67 ± 1.83B |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 42 | 12.57 ± 1.92A | 29 | 99.04 ± 0.93A | 57 | 16.96 ± 1.54A | 112 | 22.12 ± 1.9A | 63 | 16.36 ± |
| N | 8 | 11.55 ± 1.71A | 4 | 99.90 ± 0.55A | 9 | 14.11 ± 1.83AB | 20 | 21.02 ± 1.76A | 9 | 14.01 ± 1.80AB |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 9 | 17.96 ± 1.52A | 3 | 98.00 ± 1.73A | 3 | 17.02 ± 2.00A | 4 | 25.50 ± 1.20A | 4 | 14.75 ± 4.27AB |
| N | 6 | 13.72 ± 1.60A | 0 | NO DATA | 0 | NO DATA | 0 | NO DATA | 0 | NO DATA |
|
| ||||||||||
| T | 16 | 13.51 ± 1.96A | 5 | 99.80 ± 1.30A | 12 | 15.67 ± 1.92AB | 26 | 21.70 ± 1.96A | 12 | 15.67 ± 1.92A |
| N | 34 | 13.24 ± 1.95A | 24 | 100.41 ± 1.93A | 34 | 13.16 ± 1.89AB | 68 | 21.62 ± 1.99A | 35 | 13.37 ± 1.97AB |
For each column, values of treatment means followed by a common letter are not significantly different at 5 % level of significance. n = sample size, T = transgenic, N = null
Fig. 1Iron concentration in single transformation (a) and co-transformation (b) transgenic plants in T3 generation. *Co-transformation transgenic plants. Each bar represents a biological replicate of the event
Fig. 2Expression of ferritin genes. a Comparison of fold increase in SoyFERH1 protein and Fe concentration in transgenic plants in T3 generation ELISA (blue bars represent mean fold change ± standard error obtained from three technical replicates). Data are illustrated as fold change in transgenic seeds relative to baseline values (wild-type IR64) Fold increases in Fe content (magenta bars represent mean fold change ± standard error) in seeds of transgenic plants over that of wild type were measured from three biological replicates. b Western blot analysis of SoyFERH1 ferritin in transgenic rice seeds. Fifty micrograms of total proteins extracted from each transgenic and non-transgenic seed were fractioned by SDS-PAGE, immunoblotted, and then bound with soybean ferritin rabbit polyclonal antibodies. The predicted 28-kDa protein band is ferritin. M = Protein Size Marker (Amersham, RPN 756); WT = wild-type IR64; 1–4, 6–7 = T1 IR64 events with SoyFERH1; 5 and 8 are null segregants. c In situ Western blot of transgenic rice seeds with ferritin. (I–II) Polished seed (longitudinal section and whole seed) of IR64 transformed with SoyFERH1 driven by GLUB4 promoter bound with anti-SoyFERH1 antibody (left) versus polished IR64 seed (right). (III–IV) Polished seed (longitudinal section and whole seed) of marker-free IR64 transformed with SoyFERH1 driven by GLUB1 promoter bound with anti-SoyFERH1antibody (left) versus polished IR64 seed (right). (V–VI) Fe localization using Pearl Prussian blue staining (transverse section and whole polished seed of transgenic IR64 with SoyFERH1 driven by GLUB4 (left) versus wild-type IR64 (right). (VII–VIII) Fe localization using Pearl Prussian blue (transverse section and whole polished seed of transgenic marker-free IR64 with SoyFERH1 driven by GLUB1 (left) versus wild-type IR64 (right)
Fig. 3Quantitative PCR measurement of expression of the ferritin gene in transgenic and wild-type IR64 seeds (a) and selected Fe homeostasis genes in different transgenic lines compared with wild-type IR64 (b) *co-transformation transgenic plants