AIM: Though about 20% of working age breast cancer survivors do not return to work after treatment, few studies have addressed risk factors for unemployment. The majority of studies on occupational consequences of breast cancer focus on non-employment, which is a mixture of sickness absence, unemployment, retirement pensions and other reasons for not working. Unemployment in combination with breast cancer may represent a particular challenge for these women. The aim of the present study is therefore to analyze the risk for unemployment in the years following diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer. METHOD: This study included 14,750 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 2001-2009 identified through a population-based clinical database and linked with information from Danish administrative population based registers for information on labour market affiliation, socio-demography and co-morbid conditions. Multivariable analyses were performed by Cox's proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Two years after treatment, 81% of patients were still part of the work force, 10% of which were unemployed. Increasing duration of unemployment before breast cancer was associated with an adjusted HR = 4.37 (95% CI: 3.90-4.90) for unemployment after breast cancer. Other risk factors for unemployment included low socioeconomic status and demography, while adjuvant therapy did not increase the risk of unemployment. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of unemployment before breast cancer was the most important determinant of unemployment after breast cancer treatment. This allows identification of a particularly vulnerable group of patients in need of rehabilitation.
AIM: Though about 20% of working age breast cancer survivors do not return to work after treatment, few studies have addressed risk factors for unemployment. The majority of studies on occupational consequences of breast cancer focus on non-employment, which is a mixture of sickness absence, unemployment, retirement pensions and other reasons for not working. Unemployment in combination with breast cancer may represent a particular challenge for these women. The aim of the present study is therefore to analyze the risk for unemployment in the years following diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer. METHOD: This study included 14,750 women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 2001-2009 identified through a population-based clinical database and linked with information from Danish administrative population based registers for information on labour market affiliation, socio-demography and co-morbid conditions. Multivariable analyses were performed by Cox's proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Two years after treatment, 81% of patients were still part of the work force, 10% of which were unemployed. Increasing duration of unemployment before breast cancer was associated with an adjusted HR = 4.37 (95% CI: 3.90-4.90) for unemployment after breast cancer. Other risk factors for unemployment included low socioeconomic status and demography, while adjuvant therapy did not increase the risk of unemployment. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of unemployment before breast cancer was the most important determinant of unemployment after breast cancer treatment. This allows identification of a particularly vulnerable group of patients in need of rehabilitation.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; return to work; socioeconomic status; treatment; unemployment
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Ines Vaz-Luis; Jingyi Gong; Padma Sheila Rajagopal; Kathryn J Ruddy; Rulla M Tamimi; Lidia Schapira; Steven Come; Virginia Borges; Janet S de Moor; Ann H Partridge Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Li Wang; Brian Y Hong; Sean A Kennedy; Yaping Chang; Chris J Hong; Samantha Craigie; Henry Y Kwon; Beatriz Romerosa; Rachel J Couban; Susan Reid; James S Khan; Michael McGillion; Victoria Blinder; Jason W Busse Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-05-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Layal Chaker; Abby Falla; Sven J van der Lee; Taulant Muka; David Imo; Loes Jaspers; Veronica Colpani; Shanthi Mendis; Rajiv Chowdhury; Wichor M Bramer; Raha Pazoki; Oscar H Franco Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2015-04-03 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: AnneClaire G N M Zaman; Kristien M A J Tytgat; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Angela G E M de Boer Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-05-10 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: S J Tamminga; U Bültmann; O Husson; J L P Kuijpens; M H W Frings-Dresen; A G E M de Boer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-09-22 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Laura Schärfe Jensen; Charlotte Overgaard; Henrik Bøggild; Jens Peter Garne; Thomas Lund; Kim Overvad; Kirsten Fonager Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Matilde Leonardi; Davide Guido; Rui Quintas; Fabiola Silvaggi; Erika Guastafierro; Andrea Martinuzzi; Somnath Chatterji; Seppo Koskinen; Beata Tobiasz-Adamczyk; Josep Maria Haro; Maria Cabello; Alberto Raggi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-04-11 Impact factor: 3.390