Dimitrios V Avgerinos1, William DeBois2, Arash Salemi2. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA davgerinos@gmail.com. 2. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, New York Presbyterian-Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Recent data show that up to 50% of heart procedures require blood transfusion, which can have adverse long- and short-term outcomes for the patient. This led to the updated 2011 Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS)/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) guidelines in an attempt to adopt more effective blood conservation techniques. We present our results after the implementation of a more aggressive strategy for intraoperative blood conservation in cardiac surgery. METHODS: Our cardiac surgery database was reviewed retrospectively, comparing outcomes from two different time periods, after the implementation of a more effective two-way blood conservation strategy beginning in March 2012: more aggressive intraoperative autologous donation (IAD) based on a newly constructed nomogram, and the use of a shorter length circuit of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) which allowed for lower fluid volume as a prime. The method of retrograde autologous priming (RAP) was the same for both time periods. RESULTS: A total of 1126 patients (Group 1) were studied in a 12-month period (March 2012-February 2013) after the implementation of the new strategy, and compared with 3758 patients (Group 2) of the previous 36-month period (March 2009-February 2012). There was a significant reduction in the percent change of the intraoperative haematocrit between Groups 1 and 2 (14 vs 28%, P = 0.01), with an increase in the mean IAD volume (655 vs 390 ml, P = 0.02) and a reduction in the CPB priming volume (1000 vs 1600 ml, P = 0.03). Group 1 required significantly less blood transfusions in the perioperative period (29 vs 49%, P = 0.02) and had significantly reduced postoperative rates of respiratory failure (3 vs 7%, P = 0.03), pneumonia (1 vs 3.1%, P = 0.01), chest tube output (350 vs 730 ml, P = 0.01), reoperation for bleeding (1.2 vs 2.5%, P = 0.04) and length of stay (6.1 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Blood conservation is safe and effective in reducing transfusions in cardiac surgery, minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality. Aggressive IAD and low CPB prime, along with effective RAP, is the three-way blood conservation strategy that leads to improved outcomes in cardiac surgery.
OBJECTIVES: Recent data show that up to 50% of heart procedures require blood transfusion, which can have adverse long- and short-term outcomes for the patient. This led to the updated 2011 Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS)/Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) guidelines in an attempt to adopt more effective blood conservation techniques. We present our results after the implementation of a more aggressive strategy for intraoperative blood conservation in cardiac surgery. METHODS: Our cardiac surgery database was reviewed retrospectively, comparing outcomes from two different time periods, after the implementation of a more effective two-way blood conservation strategy beginning in March 2012: more aggressive intraoperative autologous donation (IAD) based on a newly constructed nomogram, and the use of a shorter length circuit of the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) which allowed for lower fluid volume as a prime. The method of retrograde autologous priming (RAP) was the same for both time periods. RESULTS: A total of 1126 patients (Group 1) were studied in a 12-month period (March 2012-February 2013) after the implementation of the new strategy, and compared with 3758 patients (Group 2) of the previous 36-month period (March 2009-February 2012). There was a significant reduction in the percent change of the intraoperative haematocrit between Groups 1 and 2 (14 vs 28%, P = 0.01), with an increase in the mean IAD volume (655 vs 390 ml, P = 0.02) and a reduction in the CPB priming volume (1000 vs 1600 ml, P = 0.03). Group 1 required significantly less blood transfusions in the perioperative period (29 vs 49%, P = 0.02) and had significantly reduced postoperative rates of respiratory failure (3 vs 7%, P = 0.03), pneumonia (1 vs 3.1%, P = 0.01), chest tube output (350 vs 730 ml, P = 0.01), reoperation for bleeding (1.2 vs 2.5%, P = 0.04) and length of stay (6.1 vs 8.2 days, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Blood conservation is safe and effective in reducing transfusions in cardiac surgery, minimizing perioperative morbidity and mortality. Aggressive IAD and low CPB prime, along with effective RAP, is the three-way blood conservation strategy that leads to improved outcomes in cardiac surgery.
Authors: Camilo A Velasquez; Mrinal Singh; Syed Usman Bin Mahmood; Adam J Brownstein; Mohammad A Zafar; Ayman Saeyeldin; Bulat A Ziganshin; John A Elefteriades Journal: Int J Angiol Date: 2017-07-27
Authors: Sathappan Karuppiah; Christopher Mckee; Ashley Hodge; Mark Galantowicz; Joseph Tobias; Aymen Naguib Journal: J Extra Corpor Technol Date: 2016-09
Authors: Min Suk Chae; Mihyun Lee; Min Ho Choi; Je Uk Park; Misun Park; Young Hoon Kim; Hoon Choi; Jin Joo; Young Eun Moon Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Tevfik İlker Akçam; Ali Özdil; Önder Kavurmacı; Pelin Öztürk; Deniz Can Başaran; İsmet Tanzer Çalkavur; Ufuk Çağırıcı; Mustafa Özbaran Journal: Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 0.332