Literature DB >> 24482247

Comparison of propofol and volatile agents for maintenance of anesthesia during elective craniotomy procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jason Chui1, Ramamani Mariappan, Jigesh Mehta, Pirjo Manninen, Lashmi Venkatraghavan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both propofol and volatile anesthetics are commonly used for maintenance of anesthesia in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. The effects of these two classes of drugs on cerebral hemodynamics have been compared in many clinical trials The objectives of this review were to evaluate the cerebral hemodynamic effects, operative conditions, recovery profiles, postoperative complications, and neurological outcomes of propofol-based vs volatile-based anesthesia for craniotomy.
METHODS: MEDLINE®, EMBASE™, Cochrane, and other relevant databases were searched for randomized controlled trials that compared propofol-maintained anesthesia with volatile-maintained anesthesia in adult patients undergoing elective craniotomy. The primary outcome measure was the intraoperative brain relaxation score. Secondary outcome measures included intraoperative cerebral hemodynamics (intracranial pressure [ICP], cerebral perfusion pressure [CPP]), cardiovascular changes, recovery profiles, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes (neurological morbidity, mortality, quality of life). A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model to compare the outcomes of the two anesthetic techniques.
RESULTS: Fourteen studies (1,819 patients) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Brain relaxation scores were similar between the two groups after dural opening; however, ICP was lower (weighted mean difference of -5.2 mmHg; 95% confidence interval -6.81 to -3.6) and CPP was higher (weighted mean difference of 16.3 mmHg; 95% confidence interval 12.2 to 20.46) in patients receiving propofol-maintained anesthesia. Postoperative complications and recovery profiles were similar between the two groups, except for postoperative nausea and vomiting being less frequent with propofol-maintained anesthesia. There were inadequate data to perform a meta-analysis on clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION: Propofol-maintained and volatile-maintained anesthesia were associated with similar brain relaxation scores, although mean ICP values were lower and CPP values higher with propofol-maintained anesthesia. There are inadequate data to compare clinically significant outcomes such as neurological morbidity or mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24482247     DOI: 10.1007/s12630-014-0118-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Neuroanesthesia].

Authors:  K Engelhard
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Anesthetic management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Shooka Esmaeeli; Juan Valencia; Lauren K Buhl; Andres Brenes Bastos; Sogand Goudarzi; Matthias Eikermann; Corey Fehnel; Richard Pollard; Ajith Thomas; Christopher S Ogilvy; Shahzad Shaefi; Ala Nozari
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Propofol infusion syndrome: a retrospective analysis at a level 1 trauma center.

Authors:  James H Diaz; Amit Prabhakar; Richard D Urman; Alan David Kaye
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2014-12-17

4.  Effects of Moderate Hyperventilation on Jugular Bulb Gases under Propofol or Isoflurane Anesthesia during Supratentorial Craniotomy.

Authors:  Lan Meng; Shu-Qin Li; Nan Ji; Fang Luo
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Comparative evaluation of propofol, sevoflurane and desflurane for neuroanaesthesia: A prospective randomised study in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.

Authors:  Priska Bastola; Hemant Bhagat; Jyotsna Wig
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2015-05

6.  Effect of propofol and sevoflurane on the inflammatory response of patients undergoing craniotomy.

Authors:  Jasmina Markovic-Bozic; Blaz Karpe; Iztok Potocnik; Ales Jerin; Andrej Vranic; Vesna Novak-Jankovic
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Clinico-anesthetic changes following administration of propofol alone and in combination of meperidine and pentazocine lactate in dogs.

Authors:  A K Anandmay; L L Dass; A K Sharma; M K Gupta; K K Singh; B K Roy
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-11-02

Review 8.  Effect of propofol and remifentanil on cerebral perfusion and oxygenation in pigs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mai Louise Grandsgaard Mikkelsen; Rikard Ambrus; James Edward Miles; Helle Harding Poulsen; Finn Borgbjerg Moltke; Thomas Eriksen
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 1.695

Review 9.  Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ha Yeon Kim; Ja Eun Lee; Ha Yan Kim; Jeongmin Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  Comparison of volatile anesthetic-induced preconditioning in cardiac and cerebral system: molecular mechanisms and clinical aspects.

Authors:  Shasha Chen; Christopher Lotz; Norbert Roewer; Jens-Albert Broscheit
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.175

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.