Literature DB >> 24482056

[Point-of-care diagnostics compared to standard coagulation tests in multiple trauma. Pros and cons].

K Johanning1.   

Abstract

The haemostasiological management of patients with multiple injuries requires rapid and adequate therapy decisions due to the highly dynamic surroundings. For this, diagnostic techniques which have the ability to detect and differentiate coagulation disorders that are commonly present in multiple trauma patients are necessary. Widely used routine coagulation tests (e.g., aPTT or PT) sensitively measure impairments of the intrinsic or extrinsic pathway, but without further identification or differentiation. Important influencing parameters like acidosis, hypothermia, fibrinolysis or polymerization dysfunction but especially the clot quality are not detectable. Moreover, the turn around times of these tests are about 30-60 min. However, thrombelastography measures clot strength and stability in whole blood under the present conditions of the injured patient. Impairments of clot quality can be differentiated. Because of the visualization of the clot formation, a patient's coagulation capacity can be assessed within minutes. Admittedly the use of these point-of-care devices in the operation theatre requires human and temporal resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24482056     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-013-2489-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  32 in total

1.  Usefulness of thrombelastography in assessment of trauma patient coagulation.

Authors:  C R Kaufmann; K M Dwyer; J D Crews; S J Dols; A L Trask
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1997-04

2.  Comparison of thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) with standard plasmatic coagulation testing in paediatric surgery.

Authors:  T Haas; N Spielmann; J Mauch; C Madjdpour; O Speer; M Schmugge; M Weiss
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Fast interpretation of thromboelastometry in non-cardiac surgery: reliability in patients with hypo-, normo-, and hypercoagulability.

Authors:  K Görlinger; D Dirkmann; C Solomon; A A Hanke
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 4.  Coagulation monitoring of the bleeding traumatized patient.

Authors:  Pär I Johansson
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.706

Review 5.  Perioperative coagulation monitoring.

Authors:  Sibylle A Kozek-Langenecker
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2010-03

6.  Dextran and hydroxyethyl starch interfere with fibrinogen assays.

Authors:  S T Hiippala
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.276

Review 7.  Acute coagulopathy of trauma: mechanism, identification and effect.

Authors:  Karim Brohi; Mitchell J Cohen; Ross A Davenport
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 8.  Management of bleeding and coagulopathy following major trauma: an updated European guideline.

Authors:  Donat R Spahn; Bertil Bouillon; Vladimir Cerny; Timothy J Coats; Jacques Duranteau; Enrique Fernández-Mondéjar; Daniela Filipescu; Beverley J Hunt; Radko Komadina; Giuseppe Nardi; Edmund Neugebauer; Yves Ozier; Louis Riddez; Arthur Schultz; Jean-Louis Vincent; Rolf Rossaint
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 9.  Coagulopathy: its pathophysiology and treatment in the injured patient.

Authors:  Brandon H Tieu; John B Holcomb; Martin A Schreiber
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Platelet aggregation following trauma: a prospective study.

Authors:  Nis A Windeløv; Anne M Sørensen; Anders Perner; Michael Wanscher; Claus F Larsen; Sisse R Ostrowski; Pär I Johansson; Lars S Rasmussen
Journal:  Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.276

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.