Literature DB >> 24481981

Predator facilitation or interference: a game of vipers and owls.

Keren Embar1, Ashael Raveh, Ishai Hoffmann, Burt P Kotler.   

Abstract

In predator-prey foraging games, the prey's reaction to one type of predator may either facilitate or hinder the success of another predator. We ask, do different predator species affect each other's patch selection? If the predators facilitate each other, they should prefer to hunt in the same patch; if they interfere, they should prefer to hunt alone. We performed an experiment in a large outdoor vivarium where we presented barn owls (Tyto alba) with a choice of hunting greater Egyptian gerbils (Gerbillus pyramidum) in patches with or without Saharan horned vipers (Cerastes cerastes). Gerbils foraged on feeding trays set under bushes or in the open. We monitored owl location, activity, and hunting attempts, viper activity and ambush site location, and the foraging behavior of the gerbils in bush and open microhabitats. Owls directed more attacks towards patches with vipers, and vipers were more active in the presence of owls. Owls and vipers facilitated each other's hunting through their combined effect on gerbil behavior, especially on full moon nights when vipers are more active. Owls forced gerbils into the bushes where vipers preferred to ambush, while viper presence chased gerbils into the open where they were exposed to owls. Owls and vipers took advantage of their indirect positive effect on each other. In the foraging game context, they improve each other's patch quality and hunting success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24481981     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-013-2760-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  State of emergency: behavior of gerbils is affected by the hunger state of their predators.

Authors:  Oded Berger-Tal; Burt P Kotler
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 2.  How the owl tracks its prey--II.

Authors:  Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Driven to distraction: detecting the hidden costs of flea parasitism through foraging behaviour in gerbils.

Authors:  Ashael Raveh; Burt P Kotler; Zvika Abramsky; Boris R Krasnov
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Vulnerability of black grouse hens to goshawk predation: result of food supply or predation facilitation?

Authors:  Risto Tornberg; Pekka Helle; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Honeyguides and honey gatherers: interspecific communication in a symbiotic relationship.

Authors:  H A Isack; H U Reyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Commensal and mutualistic interactions among terrestrial vertebrates.

Authors:  C R Dickman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging.

Authors:  Burt P Kotler; Joel Brown; Shomen Mukherjee; Oded Berger-Tal; Amos Bouskila
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  The use of ground-borne vibrations for prey localization in the Saharan sand vipers (Cerastes).

Authors:  Bruce A Young; Malinda Morain
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Look before you leap: is risk of injury a foraging cost?

Authors:  Oded Berger-Tal; Shomen Mukherjee; Burt P Kotler; Joel S Brown
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.980

View more
  8 in total

1.  How does the presence of a conspecific individual change the behavioral game that a predator plays with its prey?

Authors:  Reut Vardi; Zvika Abramsky; Burt P Kotler; Ofir Altstein; Michael L Rosenzweig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  To dare or not to dare? Risk management by owls in a predator-prey foraging game.

Authors:  Keren Embar; Ashael Raveh; Darren Burns; Burt P Kotler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The dilemma of foraging herbivores: dealing with food and fear.

Authors:  Clare McArthur; Peter B Banks; Rudy Boonstra; Jennifer Sorensen Forbey
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Hunting-mediated predator facilitation and superadditive mortality in a European ungulate.

Authors:  Benedikt Gehr; Elizabeth J Hofer; Mirjam Pewsner; Andreas Ryser; Eric Vimercati; Kristina Vogt; Lukas F Keller
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  The landscape of fear conceptual framework: definition and review of current applications and misuses.

Authors:  Sonny S Bleicher
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Divergent behavior amid convergent evolution: A case of four desert rodents learning to respond to known and novel vipers.

Authors:  Sonny Shlomo Bleicher; Burt P Kotler; Omri Shalev; Austin Dixon; Keren Embar; Joel S Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  An exploration of the protective effect of rodent species richness on the geographical expansion of Lassa fever in West Africa.

Authors:  Kyung-Duk Min; Jusun Hwang; Maria Cristina Schneider; Yeonghwa So; Ju-Yeun Lee; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-02-01

8.  Protective effect of predator species richness on human hantavirus infection incidence.

Authors:  Kyung-Duk Min; Ho Kim; Seung-Sik Hwang; Seongbeom Cho; Maria Cristina Schneider; Jusun Hwang; Sung-Il Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.