Literature DB >> 24481681

Estimating risks for variants of unknown significance according to their predicted pathogenicity classes with application to BRCA1.

J G Dowty1, E Lee, R McKean-Cowdin, B E Henderson, L Bernstein, G Ursin, J L Hopper.   

Abstract

Sequence-based testing of disease-susceptibility genes has identified many variants of unknown significance (VUSs) whose pathogenicity is unknown at the time of their measurement. Female breast cancer cases aged 20-49 years at diagnosis and who have VUSs in BRCA1 and no mutations in BRCA2 have previously been identified through the population-based Los Angeles County Cancer Surveillance Program. These nominal BRCA1 VUSs have been classified as "low," "medium," and "high" risk by four classification methods: Align-GVGD, Polyphen, Grantham matrix scores, and sequence conservation in mammalian species. Average hazard ratios (HRs) for classes of variants, i.e., the age-specific incidences of cancer for carriers of such variants divided by the population incidences, were estimated from the cancer family histories of first- and second-degree relatives of the index cases using modified segregation analysis. The study sample comprised 270 index cases and 4,543 of their relatives. There was weak evidence that the risk of breast cancer increases with the degree of sequence conservation (P = 0.03) and that missense variants at highly conserved sites are associated with a 5.6-fold (95 % confidence interval 1.4-22.2; P = 0.05) increased incidence of breast cancer. An upper bound of 2.3 is given for the average breast cancer HRs corresponding to variants classified as "low risk" by any of the four VUS classification methods. In summary, we have given a method to estimate cancer risks for groups of VUSs by combining existing classification methods with traditional penetrance analyses. This analysis suggests that classification methods for BRCA1 variants based on sequence conservation might be useful in a clinical setting. We have shown in principle that our method can be used to classify VUSs into clinically useful risk categories, but our specific findings should not be put into clinical practice unless confirmed by larger studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481681      PMCID: PMC4059774          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-014-2845-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  20 in total

1.  Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Polly A Marchbanks; Jill A McDonald; Hoyt G Wilson; Suzanne G Folger; Michele G Mandel; Janet R Daling; Leslie Bernstein; Kathleen E Malone; Giske Ursin; Brian L Strom; Sandra A Norman; Phyllis A Wingo; Ronald T Burkman; Jesse A Berlin; Michael S Simon; Robert Spirtas; Linda K Weiss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Analysis of missense variation in human BRCA1 in the context of interspecific sequence variation.

Authors:  V Abkevich; A Zharkikh; A M Deffenbaugh; D Frank; Y Chen; D Shattuck; M H Skolnick; A Gutin; S V Tavtigian
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Evidence for further breast cancer susceptibility genes in addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2 in a population-based study.

Authors:  A C Antoniou; P D Pharoah; G McMullan; N E Day; B A Ponder; D Easton
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  BRCA1 variants in a family study of African-American and Latina women.

Authors:  Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Lucy Y Xia; Celeste Leigh Pearce; Duncan C Thomas; Daniel O Stram; Brian E Henderson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Programs for Pedigree Analysis: MENDEL, FISHER, and dGENE.

Authors:  K Lange; D Weeks; M Boehnke
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral.

Authors:  S V Tavtigian; A M Deffenbaugh; L Yin; T Judkins; T Scholl; P B Samollow; D de Silva; A Zharkikh; A Thomas
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-07-13       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution.

Authors:  R Grantham
Journal:  Science       Date:  1974-09-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The breast cancer information core: database design, structure, and scope.

Authors:  C Szabo; A Masiello; J F Ryan; L C Brody
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.878

9.  Human non-synonymous SNPs: server and survey.

Authors:  Vasily Ramensky; Peer Bork; Shamil Sunyaev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Common variation in BRCA2 and breast cancer risk: a haplotype-based analysis in the Multiethnic Cohort.

Authors:  Matthew L Freedman; Kathryn L Penney; Daniel O Stram; Loïc Le Marchand; Joel N Hirschhorn; Laurence N Kolonel; David Altshuler; Brian E Henderson; Christopher A Haiman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 6.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.