Literature DB >> 24481593

Parallel implementation of 3D protein structure similarity searches using a GPU and the CUDA.

Dariusz Mrozek1, Miłosz Brożek, Bożena Małysiak-Mrozek.   

Abstract

Searching for similar 3D protein structures is one of the primary processes employed in the field of structural bioinformatics. However, the computational complexity of this process means that it is constantly necessary to search for new methods that can perform such a process faster and more efficiently. Finding molecular substructures that complex protein structures have in common is still a challenging task, especially when entire databases containing tens or even hundreds of thousands of protein structures must be scanned. Graphics processing units (GPUs) and general purpose graphics processing units (GPGPUs) can perform many time-consuming and computationally demanding processes much more quickly than a classical CPU can. In this paper, we describe the GPU-based implementation of the CASSERT algorithm for 3D protein structure similarity searching. This algorithm is based on the two-phase alignment of protein structures when matching fragments of the compared proteins. The GPU (GeForce GTX 560Ti: 384 cores, 2GB RAM) implementation of CASSERT ("GPU-CASSERT") parallelizes both alignment phases and yields an average 180-fold increase in speed over its CPU-based, single-core implementation on an Intel Xeon E5620 (2.40GHz, 4 cores). In this paper, we show that massive parallelization of the 3D structure similarity search process on many-core GPU devices can reduce the execution time of the process, allowing it to be performed in real time. GPU-CASSERT is available at: http://zti.polsl.pl/dmrozek/science/gpucassert/cassert.htm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481593      PMCID: PMC3936136          DOI: 10.1007/s00894-014-2067-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Model        ISSN: 0948-5023            Impact factor:   1.810


  27 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  FAST: a novel protein structure alignment algorithm.

Authors:  Jianhua Zhu; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2005-02-15

3.  CTSS: a robust and efficient method for protein structure alignment based on local geometrical and biological features.

Authors:  Tolga Can; Yuan-Fang Wang
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Soc Bioinform Conf       Date:  2003

4.  Many-core algorithms for statistical phylogenetics.

Authors:  Marc A Suchard; Andrew Rambaut
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path.

Authors:  I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1998-09

Review 6.  Surprising similarities in structure comparison.

Authors:  J F Gibrat; T Madej; S H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  A novel method to compare protein structures using local descriptors.

Authors:  Paweł Daniluk; Bogdan Lesyng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  CUDA compatible GPU cards as efficient hardware accelerators for Smith-Waterman sequence alignment.

Authors:  Svetlin A Manavski; Giorgio Valle
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  CUDASW++: optimizing Smith-Waterman sequence database searches for CUDA-enabled graphics processing units.

Authors:  Yongchao Liu; Douglas L Maskell; Bertil Schmidt
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-05-06

10.  Alignment of protein structures in the presence of domain motions.

Authors:  Roberto Mosca; Barbara Brannetti; Thomas R Schneider
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  6 in total

1.  Computational Feasibility of an Exhaustive Search of Side-Chain Conformations in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  The feasibility of genome-scale biological network inference using Graphics Processing Units.

Authors:  Raghuram Thiagarajan; Amir Alavi; Jagdeep T Podichetty; Jason N Bazil; Daniel A Beard
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 1.405

Review 3.  Graphics processing units in bioinformatics, computational biology and systems biology.

Authors:  Marco S Nobile; Paolo Cazzaniga; Andrea Tangherloni; Daniela Besozzi
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 11.622

4.  MADOKA: an ultra-fast approach for large-scale protein structure similarity searching.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Guolun Zhong; Chenzhe Liu; Judong Luo; Hui Liu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Constructing Phylogenetic Networks Based on the Isomorphism of Datasets.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Zhibin Zhang; Yanjuan Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Automated shape-based clustering of 3D immunoglobulin protein structures in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Eleftheria Polychronidou; Ilias Kalamaras; Andreas Agathangelidis; Lesley-Ann Sutton; Xiao-Jie Yan; Vasilis Bikos; Anna Vardi; Konstantinos Mochament; Nicholas Chiorazzi; Chrysoula Belessi; Richard Rosenquist; Paolo Ghia; Kostas Stamatopoulos; Panayiotis Vlamos; Anna Chailyan; Nanna Overby; Paolo Marcatili; Anastasia Hatzidimitriou; Dimitrios Tzovaras
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.