Literature DB >> 24481538

Objective outcomes analysis following microvascular gracilis transfer for facial reanimation: a review of 10 years' experience.

Prabhat K Bhama1, Julie S Weinberg2, Robin W Lindsay2, Marc H Hohman3, Mack L Cheney2, Tessa A Hadlock2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Objective assessment of smile outcome after microvascular free gracilis transfer is challenging, and quantification of smile outcomes in the literature is inconsistent. OBJECTIVE To report objective excursion and symmetry outcomes from a series of free gracilis cases and investigate the predictive value of intraoperative measurements on final outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective medical chart review was undertaken of all patients who underwent microvascular free gracilis transfer for smile at our institution over the past 10 years. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Outcome measures included the following: smile excursion, angle of smile with respect to the vertical midline, and facial symmetry during repose and with smile. Measurements were obtained using an automated tool for assessment of facial landmarks (FACE-Gram). An exhaustive set of intraoperative parameters including degree of recoil of the gracilis muscle following harvest, the degree to which the muscle foreshortened during stimulation of the obturator nerve, final stretched length of the inset muscle, surgeon assessment of neurorrhaphy and pulse pressure, ischemia time, number of sutures used during neurorrhaphy, nerve used to innervate the flap, and surgeon assessment of oral commissure overcorrection were recorded and placed into a linear regression model to investigate correlations with smile. RESULTS From March 2003 to March 2013, 154 microvascular free gracilis transfers were performed for facial reanimation at our institution, 14 (9%) of which were deemed failures. Of the remaining 140 flaps, 127 fulfilled inclusion criteria and constituted the study cohort. Smile excursion, angle excursion, and symmetry of the oral commissure at repose and with smile all improved following gracilis free flap (P < .05). Associations between selected outcomes measures and intraoperative gracilis measurements were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Facial reanimation using free gracilis transfer results in quantifiable improvements in oral commissure excursion and facial symmetry both at rest and with smiling. Associations between contractility and internal recoil of the flap and final outcome were identified. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481538     DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  12 in total

1.  Selective Stimulation of Facial Muscles Following Chronic Intraneural Electrode Array Implantation and Facial Nerve Injury in the Feline Model.

Authors:  Ronald Sahyouni; Yarah M Haidar; Omid Moshtaghi; Beverly Y Wang; Hamid R Djalilian; John C Middlebrooks; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Comparison of Objective Outcomes in Dynamic Lower Facial Reanimation With Temporalis Tendon and Gracilis Free Muscle Transfer.

Authors:  Samuel L Oyer; Jason Nellis; Lisa E Ishii; Kofi D Boahene; Patrick J Byrne
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 6.223

3.  Outcome of a graduated minimally invasive facial reanimation in patients with facial paralysis.

Authors:  Laura C Holtmann; Anja Eckstein; Kerstin Stähr; Minzhi Xing; Stephan Lang; Stefan Mattheis
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Update in facial nerve paralysis: tissue engineering and new technologies.

Authors:  Nicholas B Langhals; Melanie G Urbanchek; Amrita Ray; Michael J Brenner
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Powering the Gracilis for Facial Reanimation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Based on Donor Nerve.

Authors:  Peter M Vila; Dorina Kallogjeri; Lauren H Yaeger; John J Chi
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

6.  Selective stimulation of facial muscles with a penetrating electrode array in the feline model.

Authors:  Ronald Sahyouni; Jay Bhatt; Hamid R Djalilian; William C Tang; John C Middlebrooks; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Clinician and Automated Assessments of Facial Function Following Eyelid Weight Placement.

Authors:  Jacqueline J Greene; Joana Tavares; Diego L Guarin; Tessa Hadlock
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 4.611

8.  Evaluation of Societal Health Utility of Facial Palsy and Facial Reanimation.

Authors:  Callum Faris; Oren Tessler; Alyssa Heiser; Tessa Hadlock; Nate Jowett
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

9.  Temporalis pull-through vs fascia lata augmentation in facial reanimation for facial paralysis.

Authors:  S M Balaji
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Dec

10.  Spontaneity Assessment in Dually Innervated Gracilis Smile Reanimation Surgery.

Authors:  Joseph R Dusseldorp; Martinus M van Veen; Diego L Guarin; Olivia Quatela; Nate Jowett; Tessa A Hadlock
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.