Literature DB >> 24481483

Effectiveness of intraocular pressure-lowering medication determined by washout.

Henry D Jampel1, Brian H Chon2, Robert Stamper3, Mark Packer4, Ying Han3, Quang H Nguyen5, Tsontcho Ianchulev6.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE While medication efficacy is well documented in clinical trials, less is known of medication effectiveness in real-world clinical settings. OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medications in patients with open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective, multicenter, interventional cohort from the prerandomization phase of a randomized clinical trial at multiple ophthalmology clinics. A total of 603 patients (603 eyes) with primary open-angle glaucoma who were using up to 3 glaucoma medications were included. INTERVENTIONS One IOP measurement was made while the patient was using his or her usual medications to lower IOP (ON IOP). Eligible participants underwent washout of all IOP-lowering drops, and the diurnal IOP was measured 2 to 4 weeks later (OFF IOP). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Difference between OFF IOP and ON IOP. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection. RESULTS The mean (SD) ON IOPs for participants using 0 (n = 102), 1 (n = 272), 2 (n = 147), or 3 (n = 82) medications were 24.2 (3.2), 17.5 (3.2), 17.2 (3.1), and 17.2 (3.1) mm Hg, respectively. Patients not using medication had a mean (SD) IOP decrease of 0.2 (2.8) mm Hg at the OFF visit. Patients using 1, 2, and 3 medications had mean (SD) IOP increases of 5.4 (3.0), 6.9 (3.3), and 9.0 (3.8) mm Hg, respectively, at the OFF visit. The percentages of patients with less than a 25% increase in IOP were 38%, 21%, and 13% for those using 1, 2, and 3 medications, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Discontinuation of 1, 2, and 3 medications was associated with a clinically significant increase in IOP, although with smaller effects for the second and third medications compared with the first medication. A substantial proportion of patients showed only small changes in IOP after medication washout, suggesting either that they were not using the medication effectively or that the medication itself, although used properly, was not lowering the IOP. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01085357.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481483     DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  6 in total

1.  Twelve-month results of ab interno trabeculectomy with Kahook Dual Blade: an interventional, randomized, controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Néstor Ventura-Abreu; Julián García-Feijoo; Marta Pazos; Marc Biarnés; Laura Morales-Fernández; José María Martínez-de-la-Casa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  The feasibility and effect of deprescribing in older adults on mortality and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amy T Page; Rhonda M Clifford; Kathleen Potter; Darren Schwartz; Christopher D Etherton-Beer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Clinical Audit on the Effectiveness of Clinic-Based Intraocular Pressure Phasing for Patients With Glaucoma and Glaucoma Suspect.

Authors:  Selvaraja Nanthini; Ahmad Sukari Ain-Nasyrah; Raja Norliza Raja Omar; Azhany Yaakub; Ahmad Tajudin Liza-Sharmini
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-28

4.  Predictors of Intraocular Pressure Lowering after Phacoemulsification and iStent Implantation.

Authors:  Shaza N Al-Holou; Shane J Havens; Gillian G Treadwell; Deepta Ghate; Carol B Toris; Vikas Gulati
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-09-12

5.  Anesthetic Preconditioning as Endogenous Neuroprotection in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Tsung-Han Chou; Ganeswara Rao Musada; Giovanni Luca Romano; Elizabeth Bolton; Vittorio Porciatti
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Washout Duration of Prostaglandin Analogues: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vlad Diaconita; Matthew Quinn; Dania Jamal; Brad Dishan; Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; Cindy Hutnik
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 1.909

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.