TGFBI expression is an independent predictor of survival in adjuvant-treated lung squamous cell carcinoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Transforming growth factor β-induced protein (TGFBI) is a secreted protein that mediates cell anchoring to the extracellular matrix. This protein is downregulated in lung cancer, and when overexpressed, contributes to apoptotic cell death. Using a small series of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we previously suggested the usefulness of TGFBI as a prognostic and predictive factor in chemotherapy-treated late-stage NSCLC. In order to validate and extend these results, we broaden the analysis and studied TGFBI expression in a large series of samples obtained from stage I-IV NSCLC patients.
METHODS: TGFBI expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry in 364 completely resected primary NSCLC samples: 242 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 122 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests and the Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyse the association between TGFBI expression and survival.
RESULTS: High TGFBI levels were associated with longer overall survival (OS, P<0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS, P<0.001) in SCC patients who received adjuvant platinium-based chemotherapy. Moreover, multivariate analysis demonstrated that high TGFBI expression is an independent predictor of better survival in patients (OS: P=0.030 and PFS: P=0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: TGFBI may be useful for the identification of a subset of NSCLC who may benefit from adjuvant therapy.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide (Siegel ). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes the largest subgroup of lung cancers, accounting for ∼80% of all cases. Most patients with NSCLC are diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic disease and have very low survival expectancy (Wang ). Surgical resection is the most favourable treatment for early-stage NSCLC, although relapse is still high, especially in stage II and III (Win ). Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after complete resection is recommended in stage II and stage IIIA lung cancer patients to improve survival, although it is associated with adverse side effects and the proportion of patients who benefit from this therapy is still low (Robinson ; Scott ). To improve clinical outcomes, and to select the best performing adjuvant treatment for each patient, new tumour biomarkers that help to identify patients who are at the highest risk for recurrence are urgently needed. These biomarkers might enable clinicians to guide their treatment decisions.

Transforming growth factor β-induced protein (TGFBI) is a soluble extracellular matrix adaptor protein that mediates cell adhesion to extracellular proteins such as collagen, fibronectin and laminins through integrin binding (Kim ). Transforming growth factor β-induced protein is differentially expressed in transformed tissues. Loss of TGFBI expression has been described in several cancers such as lung (Zhao ; Shao ), neuroblastoma (Becker ), breast (Wen ) and ovary carcinoma (Ahmed ). Transforming growth factor β-induced protein is also overexpressed in several solid tumours such as colon (Kitahara ), pancreas (Schneider ) and kidney (Ivanov ). This suggests that, depending on the tissue, TGFBI can exert either pro- or anti-tumoral functions, most likely depending on the integrins to which it binds to on the cell surface (Thapa ). Interestingly, Zhao et al. demonstrated that TGFBI overexpression in lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) cells increases their sensitivity to etoposide-induced cell death (Zhao ).

Recently, we suggested that TGFBI expression might be a predictive factor of response to chemotherapy in a series of stage IV NSCLC samples, as patients with high levels of this protein respond to chemotherapy, meanwhile patients who did not respond to the treatment showed low levels of TGFBI. Moreover, we have demonstrated that TGFBI-derived proteolytic fragments induce apoptotic cell death in NSCLC (Irigoyen ). These significant results need to be validated in a greater number of samples in order to confirm TGFBI as a relevant biomarker in NSCLC. In recent years, a great number of prognostic biomarkers have been described in NSCLC (Coate ; Aggarwal ) and some are intensively evaluated for predictive value such as ERCC1 (Olaussen ; Friboulet ) or RRM1 (Rosell ). The aim of this study was to analyse the prognostic and predictive impact of this protein on the survival of NSCLC patients.

Materials and Methods

Patients and tissue samples

A series of 364 patients diagnosed with NSCLC who underwent surgical resection in the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) from 2003 to 2005 were included in this study. Histological diagnosis was carried out using the 2004 WHO classification system (Travis ). Pathologic staging of the tumours was performed according to the International System for Staging Lung Cancer (Mountain, 1997). A tissue microarray containing representative areas of 511 NSCLC specimens was constructed with triplicated 1 mm tissue cores from each tumour as previously described (Kim ). Only patients that complied the following inclusion criteria were included in this study: complete resection of the primary lung tumour, ADC or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) histology, no malignancy in the last 5 years, no neoadjuvant therapy and available clinicopathological information. Adjuvant therapy was administered in 133 NSCLC patients after resection while 217 individuals were treated exclusively with surgery. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated as the time from surgery to recurrence or death from the disease. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from surgery to the date of death.

Detailed clinical and pathological information, including age, gender and stage, is summarised in Table 1.

Table 1

Clinical and pathological characteristics of patients

Patients (n=364)	n (%)
Age-year (median±SD)	67±10
Gender
Male	176 (48.4)
Female	188 (51.6)
Stage
I	228 (62.6)
II	60 (16.5)
III	58 (15.9)
IV	18 (5.0)
pT
T1	137 (37.6)
T2	187 (51.4)
T3	17 (4.7)
T4	23 (6.3)
pN
N0	263 (72.2)
N1	66 (18.1)
N2	34 (9.4)
N3	1 (0.3)
Histology
ADC	242 (66.5)
SCC	122 (33.5)

Abbreviations: ADC=adenocarcinoma; pN=pathological N stage; pT=pathological T stage; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma; SD=standard deviation.

Tissue banking and the study protocol were approved by the institutional medical ethical committee. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient.

Reported recommendations for tumour marker prognostic studies (REMARK) criteria were followed throughout the study (Altman ).

Immunohistochemical analysis

The expression of TGFBI was assessed using an indirect immunohistochemical staining, as previously described (Irigoyen ). Briefly, tissue microarray sections were deparaffined in xylene and rehydrated with graded ethanol. Antigen retrieval was carried out in a pressure cooker in citrate buffer (10 mM, pH 6). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min. Non-specific binding sites were blocked with 5% normal goat serum in TBS-Tween (Wash buffer, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 30 min. Sections were incubated with anti-TGFBI rabbit-polyclonal antibody (1 : 25; Proteintech group, Chicago, IL, USA) overnight at 4 °C. Detection was performed with ENVISION HRP system (Dako). The peroxidase activity was visualised with diaminobenzidine. Finally, sections were washed, lightly counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated and mounted. Negative controls were performed by omission of the primary antibody or incubation with an isotype control antibody.

As previously described (Irigoyen ), the specificity of the antibody was assessed by western blot analysis in lung cancer cells in which TGFBI was overexpressed or inhibited.

Quantification of immunohistochemical staining

Two observers (MJP and ES) evaluated the samples independently and unaware of the outcomes of patients. The extension of the staining was scored as the percentage of positive cells (0–100%), and the intensity of the staining was assessed using a 4-value scoring system (0, below the level of detection; 1, weak; 2, moderate; and 3, strong). A final H score was calculated by adding the product of the percentage cells stained at a given staining intensity (0–100) and the staining intensity (0–3), as previously described (Pajares ). The median value of all H scores was chosen as the cutoff point to separate low from high TGFBI expressing tumours. Discordant independent readings were resolved by simultaneous review by the two observers.

Statistical analysis

The association between TGFBI expression and clinicopathological parameters was analysed by Pearson's chi-square test. Cumulative survival of patients was estimated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and significant differences between groups were tested using the log-rank test. Follow-up time was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of progression, death, lost to follow-up or last contact with the patient. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to assess the prognostic role of TGFBI. Only those variables with P-value <0.1 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 15.0 software (Chicago, IL, USA). A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

TGFBI expression in NSCLC

A series of 364 NSCLC patients was analysed by immunohistochemistry in this study. Transforming growth factor β-induced protein staining was found in the stroma of normal and tumour tissue (Figure 1). Specifically, in non-tumour tissues, lung bronchiolar epithelia showed immunoreactivity for TGFBI (Figure 1A) meanwhile the alveoli were negative for this protein (Figure 1B). In lung tumours, TGFBI was detected in the cytoplasm of the cells in all the samples (Figure 1C and D). Patients were dichotomised into high and low by the median TGFBI expression H score. No significant association was found between TGFBI expression and clinicopathological features of the patients (Table 2). However, when patients were stratified according to the histological subtype, a significant correlation was found between TGFBI expression and smoking status in ADC patients (P=0.021). More interestingly, in the SCC subgroup, TGFBI expression was higher in early-stage tumours (P=0.014) and in patients without lymph node involvement (P=0.019).

Figure 1

Transforming growth factor Immunohistochemical staining for TGFBI protein in non-tumour tissue (A and B) and lung carcinomas (C and D). Immunoreactivity was observed in the cytoplasm of bronchiole epithelial cells (A), ADC (C) and SCC (D). No imunostaining was detected in lung alveoli (B). Scale bar, 50 μm.

Table 2

Relationship between TGFBI expression and clinicopathological features of NSCLC patients

	NSCLC (n=364)			ADC (n=242)			SCC (n=122)
	n (%)			n (%)			n (%)
	Low	High	P	Low	High	P	Low	High	P
Age
⩽70	107 (59.8)	72 (40.2)	0.284	71 (43.8)	91 (56.2)	0.146	37 (56.1)	29 (43.9)	0.692
>70	121 (65.4)	64 (34.6)		43 (53.7)	37 (46.3)		29 (51.8)	27 (48.2)
Gender
Male	91 (51.7)	85 (48.3)	0.405	49 (48)	53 (52)	0.804	42 (56.8)	32 (43.2)	0.464
Female	89 (47.3)	99 (52.7)		65 (46.4)	75 (53.6)		24 (50)	24 (50)
Stage
I–II	136 (47.2)	152 (52.8)	0.098	89 (46.6)	102 (53.4)	0.758	47 (48.5)	50 (51.5)	0.014
III–IV	44 (57.9)	32 (42.1)		25 (49)	26 (51)		19 (76)	6 (24)
pT
T1	63 (46)	74 (54)	0.304	41 (41.8)	57 (58.2)	0.175	22 (56.4)	17 (43.6)	0.725
T2/T3/T4	117 (51.5)	110 (48.5)		73 (50.7)	71 (49.3)		44 (53)	39 (47)
pN
N0	124 (47.1)	139 (52.9)	0.156	88 (47.6)	97 (52.4)	0.796	36 (46.2)	42 (53.8)	0.019
N1–N2–N3	56 (55.4)	45 (44.6)		26 (45.6)	31 (54.4)		30 (68.2)	14 (31.8)
Histology
ADC	114 (80.3)	128 (19.7)	0.208
SCC	66 (54.1)	56 (45.9)
Smoking statusa
Never	22 (57.9)	16 (42.1)	0.204	22 (57.9)	16 (42.1)	0.021	—	—	0.496
Former	90 (52.6)	81 (47.4)		58 (52.7)	52 (47.3)		32 (52.5)	29 (47.5)
Current	68 (44.2)	86 (55.8)		34 (36.2)	60 (63.8)		34 (56.7)	26 (43.3)

Abbreviations: ADC=adenocarcinoma; NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; pN=pathological N stage; pT=pathological T stage; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma.

Smoking status data were available for n=363 patients. The values highlighted in bold are statistically significant (P<0.05).

TGFBI and clinical outcome in NSCLC

To further extend our previous study about the potential value of TGFBI as a relevant biomarker in NSCLC (Irigoyen ), we sought to investigate whether TGFBI may influence disease outcome in a series of 364 NSCLC patients.

First, we analysed the expression of TGFBI in the entire cohort of NSCLC patients. Patients with high levels of TGFBI showed better OS (P=0.015) (Figure 2A) and longer PFS (P=0.04) (Figure 2D) than patients with low TGFBI expression. Interestingly, when we stratified these patients according to histology (242 ADC and 122 SCC), the same association between high TGFBI expression and better prognosis was restricted to lung SCC patients (OS: P=0.002 and PFS: P<0.001) (Figure 2B and E, respectively). In contrast to those findings, no significant association was found between TGFBI expression and OS or PFS in lung ADC patients (OS: P=0.787; PFS: P=0.722) (Figure 2C and F).

Figure 2

High TGFBI levels were associated with longer survival in patients with SCC of the lung. Kaplan–Meier curves of OS (A–C) and PFS (D–F) for high and low expression of TGFBI. The median was used as the cutoff point.

To get further insights into the potential value of TGFBI as a predictive biomarker in NSCLC, we analysed the clinical outcome after patient stratification based on adjuvant therapy. In patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy after surgery, an association between higher TGFBI levels and longer OS and PFS was found (P=0.001 and P=0.018, respectively) (Figure 3A and D). We further sought to determine whether this behaviour occurred in both histological subtypes. Among patients treated with adjuvant therapy, the SCC subgroup showed similar results, that is, high TGFBI expression was associated with better OS (P<0.001) (Figure 3B) and PFS (P<0.001) (Figure 3E). In contrast, TGFBI expression in adjuvant-treated ADC patients showed no statistical differences in OS or PFS (P=0.161 and P=0.97, respectively) (Figure 3C and F). Moreover, patients treated only with surgery did not show any correlation between TGFBI levels and survival in SCC (OS: P=0.263 and PFS: P=0.088) or ADC subtypes (OS: P=0.362 and PFS: P=0.386).

Figure 3

High TGFBI is a good prognostic factor in lung SCC patients who received adjuvant treatment. Kaplan–Meier curves of OS (A–C) and PFS (D–F) for high and low expression of TGFBI. The median was used as the cutoff point.

Multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model was performed on the complete series to determine independent risk factor for OS and PFS in NSCLC. Transforming growth factor β-induced protein expression (P=0.044), age (P=0.009) and stage (P=0.001) were found to be independent predictor factors for OS (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 1). In regards to PFS, only tumour stage reached the level of statistical significance (P=0.001), although we observed a trend towards an association between high TGFBI expression and better outcome (P=0.085). Interestingly, when we evaluated adjuvant-treated SCC, TGFBI and stage were found to be independent predictor factors for OS (TGFBI, P=0.012; stage, P=0.001) and PFS (TGFBI, P=0.003; stage, P=0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3

Multivariate analysis for the effect of TGFBI expression on OS or PFS in adjuvant-treated NSCLC patients

	OS		PFS
	HR (95% CI)	P	HR (95% CI)	P
NSCLC
TGFBI H-score
⩽173
>173	0.680 (0.467–0.990)	P=0.044	0.739 (0.524–1.043)	P=0.085
Age
<70
⩾70	1.628 (1.1287–2.351)	P=0.009
Stage
I–II
III–IV	1.940 (1.295–2.906)	P=0.001	2.536 (1.762–3.649)	P<0.001
SCC
TGFBI H-score
⩽173
>173	0.450 (0.241–0.838)	P=0.012	0.377 (0.197–0.720)	P=0.003
Stage
I–II
III–IV	2.557 (1.411–4.633)	P=0.001	2.719 (1.483–4.985)	P=0.001

Abbreviations: NSCLC=non-small cell lung cancer; OS=overall survival; PFS=progression-free survival; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma.

Together, these findings indicate that TGFBI expression may be useful for the identification of a subset of NSCLC who may benefit from adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy after resection.

Discussion

TGFBI was originally isolated from a cDNA library performed in A549 lung ADC cells treated with TGFβ. Mostly studied in dystrophy of the cornea, TGFBI is linked to cancer due to its function as adapter between the integrins expressed on the cell surface and some extracellular matrix proteins. Early reports from Zhao demonstrated that TGFBI/Bigh3 expression was downregulated in asbestos induced lung cancer models in mice, as well as in several NSCLC-derived human cell lines compared with primary bronchial epithelial cells (Zhao ; Shao ). Reports from the same group showed TGFBI promoter hypermethylation in lung cancer cell lines as one possible mechanistic explanation for its decreased expression in transformed cells (Shao ; Shah ).

In this work, we have analysed TGFBI expression by immunohistochemistry in 364 samples of NSCLC (242 ADC and 122 SCC). Data obtained from lung SCC samples showed that decreased TGFBI expression significantly correlated with advanced tumour stages and the presence of metastasis in lymph nodes. As already mentioned, TGFBI sustains cell adhesion to substrates (Kim ), therefore, losses in the structures that provide anchorage to the substrates might increase cell motility and the chance to metastasise. In fact, two recent reports showed that TGFBI overexpression in breast and lung cancer cell lines suppressed their in vitro and in vivo ability to metastasise (Ween ; Wen ). Our results are in line with those reports, and provide further clinical relevance to support them.

The use of genes related to cell metastasis and survival as markers to predict outcome is based on their physiological role and offers them as potential targets for therapy. Building on the findings from our group (Irigoyen ) and others (Zhao ), we hypothesised that TGFBI could serve as good predictor for survival in NSCLC patients treated with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. As showed herein, a strong correlation exists between high TGFBI expression and both PFS and OS in NSCLC patients. When samples were stratified according to tumour histology, statistical significance upheld only for SCC patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed the value of TGFBI as an independent predictor for survival in adjuvant-treated SCC.

Besides its contribution to cell adhesion, there is another feature of TGFBI that might be relevant for tumour progression: TGFBI-derived fragments are pro-apoptotic in several cell types (Kim ; Morand ). In this respect, we have previously demonstrated that TGFBI-derived proteolytic peptides provoke cell death through binding to αvβ3 integrins and induction of caspase 3 activation (Irigoyen ). The reason why TGFBI induces cell death in some cell types and promotes metastasis in others is still unknown. One possible explanation may come from the activation of cell-specific proteases capable of degrading TGFBI (Wen ), such as plasmin (Ween ), or from its binding to cell type-restricted integrins, leading to activation different cellular responses (Thapa ). In fact, the observed dichotomised behaviour of this marker between ADC and SCC samples is probably a consequence of their phenotypical heterogeneity. The finding of tissue-specific biomarkers is not trivial, as results of recent clinical trials advocate for histology-based decision-making for therapy of NSCLC (Okamoto ; Chang, 2011; Maus ). To improve cancer treatment efficacy, it is important to have reliable predictive markers that help clinicians to distinguish those patients who need more aggressive therapies from those who do not. This is especially important in order to carefully select treatment options while keeping in mind the principles of maximum efficacy with minimal toxicity.

In summary, the results presented herein propose TGFBI as a new predictive marker of survival in lung SCC patients treated with adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy, and emphasise the differences in the biology of the two main types of NSCLC (Langer ).