Literature DB >> 24481246

Interspecific variation in prey capture behavior by co-occurring Nepenthes pitcher plants: evidence for resource partitioning or sampling-scheme artifacts?

Lijin Chin1, Arthur Y C Chung2, Charles Clarke1.   

Abstract

Pitcher plants of the genus Nepenthes capture a wide range of arthropod prey for nutritional benefit, using complex combinations of visual and olfactory signals and gravity-driven pitfall trapping mechanisms. In many localities throughout Southeast Asia, several Nepenthes different species occur in mixed populations. Often, the species present at any given location have strongly divergent trap structures and preliminary surveys indicate that different species trap different combinations of arthropod prey, even when growing at the same locality. On this basis, it has been proposed that co-existing Nepenthes species may be engaged in niche segregation with regards to arthropod prey, avoiding direct competition with congeners by deploying traps that have modifications that enable them to target specific prey types. We examined prey capture among 3 multi-species Nepenthes populations in Borneo, finding that co-existing Nepenthes species do capture different combinations of prey, but that significant interspecific variations in arthropod prey combinations can often be detected only at sub-ordinal taxonomic ranks. In all lowland Nepenthes species examined, the dominant prey taxon is Formicidae, but montane Nepenthes trap few (or no) ants and 2 of the 3 species studied have evolved to target alternative sources of nutrition, such as tree shrew feces. Using similarity and null model analyses, we detected evidence for niche segregation with regards to formicid prey among 5 lowland, sympatric Nepenthes species in Sarawak. However, we were unable to determine whether these results provide support for the niche segregation hypothesis, or whether they simply reflect unquantified variation in heterogeneous habitats and/or ant communities in the study sites. These findings are used to propose improvements to the design of field experiments that seek to test hypotheses about targeted prey capture patterns in Nepenthes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nepenthes; ants; arthropods; carnivorous plants; niche segregation; targeted prey capture

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24481246      PMCID: PMC4091343          DOI: 10.4161/psb.27930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


  19 in total

1.  Form follows function: morphological diversification and alternative trapping strategies in carnivorous Nepenthes pitcher plants.

Authors:  Ulrike Bauer; C J Clemente; T Renner; W Federle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.411

2.  Longevity, lignin content and construction cost of the assimilatory organs of Nepenthes species.

Authors:  Olusegun O Osunkoya; Siti Dayanawati Daud; Franz L Wimmer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Construction costs, payback times, and the leaf economics of carnivorous plants.

Authors:  Jim D Karagatzides; Aaron M Ellison
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.844

4.  Phylogeny of the sundews, Drosera (Droseraceae), based on chloroplast rbcL and nuclear 18S ribosomal DNA Sequences.

Authors:  Fernando Rivadavia; Katsuhiko Kondo; Masahiro Kato; Mitsuyasu Hasebe
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Slippery or sticky? Functional diversity in the trapping strategy of Nepenthes carnivorous plants.

Authors:  Vincent Bonhomme; Hervé Pelloux-Prayer; Emmanuelle Jousselin; Yoël Forterre; Jean-Jacques Labat; Laurence Gaume
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 10.151

6.  Insect aquaplaning: Nepenthes pitcher plants capture prey with the peristome, a fully wettable water-lubricated anisotropic surface.

Authors:  Holger F Bohn; Walter Federle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Tree shrew lavatories: a novel nitrogen sequestration strategy in a tropical pitcher plant.

Authors:  Charles M Clarke; Ulrike Bauer; Ch'ien C Lee; Andrew A Tuen; Katja Rembold; Jonathan A Moran
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  The use of light in prey capture by the tropical pitcher plant Nepenthes aristolochioides.

Authors:  Jonathan A Moran; Charles Clarke; Brent E Gowen
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2012-07-27

9.  Trap geometry in three giant montane pitcher plant species from Borneo is a function of tree shrew body size.

Authors:  Lijin Chin; Jonathan A Moran; Charles Clarke
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Evidence for alternative trapping strategies in two forms of the pitcher plant, Nepenthes rafflesiana.

Authors:  Ulrike Bauer; T Ulmar Grafe; Walter Federle
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  4 in total

1.  Biochemical and mesophyll diffusional limits to photosynthesis are determined by prey and root nutrient uptake in the carnivorous pitcher plant Nepenthes × ventrata.

Authors:  Sebastià Capó-Bauçà; Marcel Font-Carrascosa; Miquel Ribas-Carbó; Andrej Pavlovič; Jeroni Galmés
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Picky carnivorous plants? Investigating preferences for preys' trophic levels - a stable isotope natural abundance approach with two terrestrial and two aquatic Lentibulariaceae tested in Central Europe.

Authors:  Saskia Klink; Philipp Giesemann; Gerhard Gebauer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Different pitcher shapes and trapping syndromes explain resource partitioning in Nepenthes species.

Authors:  Laurence Gaume; Vincent Bazile; Maïlis Huguin; Vincent Bonhomme
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  A novel approach for reliable qualitative and quantitative prey spectra identification of carnivorous plants combining DNA metabarcoding and macro photography.

Authors:  Thilo Krueger; Adam T Cross; Jeremy Hübner; Jérôme Morinière; Axel Hausmann; Andreas Fleischmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.