Caroline Arbour1, Manon Choinière, Jane Topolovec-Vranic, Carmen G Loiselle, Kathleen Puntillo, Céline Gélinas. 1. *Ingram School of Nursing, McGill University †Centre for Nursing Research and Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Qc, Canada ‡Quebec Nursing Intervention Research Network (RRISIQ), Montreal, Qc, Canada §The Alan Edwards Center for Research on Pain, McGill University ∥Centre de recherche de Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Université de Montréal, Montreal, Qc ¶Trauma and Neurosurgery Program, Keenan Research Center of the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada #Department of Physiological Nursing, School of Nursing, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Pain behaviors such as grimacing and muscle rigidity are recommended for pain assessment in nonverbal populations. However, these behaviors may not be appropriate for critically ill patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) depending on their level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to validate the use of behaviors for assessing pain of critically ill TBI adults with different LOC. METHODS: Using a repeated measure within subject design, participants (N=45) were observed for 1 minute before (baseline), during, and 15 minutes after 2 procedures: (1) noninvasive blood pressure: NIBP (non-nociceptive); and (2) turning (nociceptive). A behavioral checklist combining 50 items from existing pain assessment tools and video recording were used to describe participants' behaviors. Intrarater and interrater agreements of observed behaviors were also examined. RESULTS: Overall, pain behaviors were observed more frequently during turning (median=4; T=-5.336; P≤0.001) than at baseline (median=1), or during noninvasive blood pressure (median=0). TBI patients' pain behaviors were mostly "atypical" and included uncommon responses such as flushing, sudden eye opening, eye weeping, and flexion of limbs. These behaviors were observed in ≥25.0% of TBI participants during turning independent of their LOC, and in 22.2% to 66.7% of conscious participants who reported the presence of pain. Agreements were >92% among and between the 2 raters. CONCLUSIONS: This study support previous findings that critically ill TBI patients could exhibit atypical behaviors when exposed to nociceptive procedures. As such, use of current recommended pain behaviors as part of standardized scales may not be optimal for assessing the analgesic needs of this vulnerable group.
PURPOSE:Pain behaviors such as grimacing and muscle rigidity are recommended for pain assessment in nonverbal populations. However, these behaviors may not be appropriate for critically ill patients with a traumatic brain injury (TBI) depending on their level of consciousness (LOC). This study aimed to validate the use of behaviors for assessing pain of critically ill TBI adults with different LOC. METHODS: Using a repeated measure within subject design, participants (N=45) were observed for 1 minute before (baseline), during, and 15 minutes after 2 procedures: (1) noninvasive blood pressure: NIBP (non-nociceptive); and (2) turning (nociceptive). A behavioral checklist combining 50 items from existing pain assessment tools and video recording were used to describe participants' behaviors. Intrarater and interrater agreements of observed behaviors were also examined. RESULTS: Overall, pain behaviors were observed more frequently during turning (median=4; T=-5.336; P≤0.001) than at baseline (median=1), or during noninvasive blood pressure (median=0). TBIpatients' pain behaviors were mostly "atypical" and included uncommon responses such as flushing, sudden eye opening, eye weeping, and flexion of limbs. These behaviors were observed in ≥25.0% of TBIparticipants during turning independent of their LOC, and in 22.2% to 66.7% of conscious participants who reported the presence of pain. Agreements were >92% among and between the 2 raters. CONCLUSIONS: This study support previous findings that critically ill TBIpatients could exhibit atypical behaviors when exposed to nociceptive procedures. As such, use of current recommended pain behaviors as part of standardized scales may not be optimal for assessing the analgesic needs of this vulnerable group.
Authors: Sara Fratino; Lorenzo Peluso; Marta Talamonti; Marco Menozzi; Lucas Akira Costa Hirai; Francisco A Lobo; Chiara Prezioso; Jacques Creteur; Jean-François Payen; Fabio Silvio Taccone Journal: Brain Sci Date: 2021-01-15
Authors: Céline Gélinas; Mélanie Bérubé; Kathleen A Puntillo; Madalina Boitor; Melissa Richard-Lalonde; Francis Bernard; Virginie Williams; Aaron M Joffe; Craig Steiner; Rebekah Marsh; Louise Rose; Craig M Dale; Darina M Tsoller; Manon Choinière; David L Streiner Journal: Crit Care Date: 2021-04-13 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Caíque Jordan Nunes Ribeiro; Andra Carla Santos de Araújo; Saulo Barreto Brito; Daniele Vieira Dantas; Mariangela da Silva Nunes; José Antonio Barreto Alves; Maria do Carmo de Oliveira Ribeiro Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2018-03