Literature DB >> 24480678

A management algorithm based on delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions.

Nicholas G Burgess1, Stephen J Williams1, Luke F Hourigan2, Gregor J Brown3, Simon A Zanati4, Rajvinder Singh5, William Tam5, Joshua Butt6, Karen Byth7, Michael J Bourke8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Bleeding is the main complication of wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for large colonic lesions. Few studies have examined bleeding outcomes after WF-EMR, and there are no evidence-based guidelines for management of bleeding in this group. We analyzed outcomes of patients with clinically significant post-EMR bleeding (CSPEB) and present a management algorithm based on our findings.
METHODS: In a prospective study, we collected data from WF-EMR of sessile colorectal polyps 20 mm or larger from 1039 patients who participated in the Australian Colonic Endoscopic resection multicenter study from July 2008 through May 2012. Data included patient and lesion characteristics and procedural, clinical, and histologic outcomes. Patients participated in a structured telephone interview 14 days after the procedure; independent predictors of a moderate or severe outcome by American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopists criteria, or any intervention for hemostasis, were identified.
RESULTS: Sixty-two patients had CSPEB (6.0%); 34 were managed conservatively (55%) and 27 underwent colonoscopy (44%). One patient had primary embolization. Endoscopic therapy was applied in 21 cases; 14 had active bleeding. Two of the conservatively managed cases underwent colonoscopy for rebleeding after discharge. On multivariable analysis, moderate or severe bleeding events were associated with hemodynamic instability (odds ratio, 12.3; P = .046) and low level of hemoglobin at presentation (odds ratio, 0.50 per 1.0 g/dL; P = .005). Intervention for hemostasis was associated with hourly or more frequent hematochezia (odds ratio, 36.7; P = .001), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 2 or higher (odds ratio, 20.1; P < .001), and transfusion (odds ratio, 18.7; P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on a multicenter prospective study, CSPEB resolves spontaneously in 55% of patients. We developed a risk factor-based algorithm that might assist physicians in the management of bleeding. Patients responding to initial resuscitation can be observed, with a lower threshold for intervention in those with the identified risk factors.
Copyright © 2014 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACE Resection Study; Colonic Polyps; Colorectal Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Polypectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24480678     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.01.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  17 in total

Review 1.  Update on Difficult Polypectomy Techniques.

Authors:  Saowanee Ngamruengphong; Heiko Pohl; Yamile Haito-Chavez; Mouen A Khashab
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-01

Review 2.  Optimizing Resection of Large Colorectal Polyps.

Authors:  Steven J Heitman; David J Tate; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03

3.  Haemostasis and prevention of bleeding related to ER: The role of a novel self-assembling peptide.

Authors:  Sharmila Subramaniam; Kesavan Kandiah; Sreedhari Thayalasekaran; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Pradeep Bhandari
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  Prediction of Clinically Significant Bleeding Following Wide-Field Endoscopic Resection of Large Sessile and Laterally Spreading Colorectal Lesions: A Clinical Risk Score.

Authors:  Farzan F Bahin; Khalid N Rasouli; Karen Byth; Luke F Hourigan; Rajvinder Singh; Gregor J Brown; Simon A Zanati; Alan Moss; Spiro Raftopoulos; Stephen J Williams; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 10.864

5.  Prophylactic clipping to prevent delayed colonic post-polypectomy bleeding: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies.

Authors:  Kirles Bishay; Zhao Wu Meng; Levi Frehlich; Matthew T James; Gilaad G Kaplan; Michael J Bourke; Robert J Hilsden; Steven J Heitman; Nauzer Forbes
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Anti-platelet therapy and endoscopic procedures: eyes wide shut?

Authors:  Cesare Hassan; Angelo Zullo
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2015-06-24

Review 7.  Sessile Serrated Adenomas: How to Detect, Characterize and Resect.

Authors:  Michael X Ma; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 8.  Evaluation and long-term outcomes of the different modalities used in colonic endoscopic mucosal resection.

Authors:  Asimina Gaglia; Sanchoy Sarkar
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-04

9.  Endoscopic full-thickness resection of colorectal lesions with the full-thickness resection device: clinical experience from two referral centers in Greece.

Authors:  Magdalini Velegraki; Artemis Trikola; Konstantinos Vasiliadis; Maria Fragaki; Afroditi Mpitouli; Ioannis Dimas; Evangelos Voudoukis; Elpida Giannikaki; Amalia Kapranou; Athanasios Kordelas; Gerasimos Stefanidis; Gregorios A Paspatis
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-06-10

10.  Prophylactic Endoscopic Clipping Does Not Prevent Delayed Postpolypectomy Bleeding in Routine Clinical Practice: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Nauzer Forbes; Robert J Hilsden; Brendan Cord Lethebe; Courtney M Maxwell; Mubasiru Lamidi; Gilaad G Kaplan; Matthew T James; Roshan Razik; Lawrence C Hookey; William A Ghali; Michael J Bourke; Steven J Heitman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 12.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.