Literature DB >> 24480671

Age discrimination in osteoporosis screening--data from the Aalborg University Hospital Record for Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (AURORA).

Stig Andersen1, Peter Laurberg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Old age carries a markedly increased risk of osteoporotic fractures with subsequent disability, dependency and premature death. Timely detection and treatment reduces fracture risk and particular attention should be drawn to age.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of age on referral for osteoporosis screening. SETTING AND METHODS: Dual energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) at the Osteoporosis Clinic in North Denmark was reorganised from 2010. Risk factors, anthropometry and bone mineral density were recorded and considered in the reply and recommendations to the referring doctor. We report data from the 8,131 consecutive evaluations in 7914 individuals at the Osteoporosis Clinic from January 1st 2010 through December 31st 2012.
RESULTS: Risk factor data were available in >96% and DXA in 98%. Population DXA frequency decreased markedly after the 7th decade and was performed yearly in 1.2% of the population aged >80 years in North Denmark. The >80 years group had more fragility fractures and lower T-scores (p<0.001) compared to those below 80 years of age, and age >80 years was a dominant risk factor for fragility fracture (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.0-2.9; p<0.001) and for having diagnosed osteoporosis by DXA (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.7, 2.5; p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Referral for osteoporosis screening decreased after the 7th decade despite the finding that high age carried the highest risk of osteoporosis by DXA and by fragility fracture. Osteoporosis is a disease of aging, but it is apparently not recognised as such. This is likely to cause undertreatment among the old.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age discrimination; DXA; Osteoporosis; Referral pattern; Risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24480671     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  5 in total

1.  An efficient case finding strategy to diagnose osteoporosis in a developing society with low treatment frequency.

Authors:  Vibeke Neergaard Sørensen; Piotr Wojtek; Dorthe S Pedersen; Stig Andersen
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Time trends in osteoporosis risk factor profiles: a comparative analysis of risk factors, comorbidities, and medications over twelve years.

Authors:  Jakob Præst Holm; Lars Hyldstrup; Jens-Erik Beck Jensen
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Patients 80 + have similar medication initiation rates to those aged 50-79 in Ontario FLS.

Authors:  J E M Sale; A Yang; V Elliot-Gibson; R Jain; R Sujic; D Linton; J Weldon; L Frankel; E Bogoch
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The prevalence of patients treated for osteoporosis in Greenland is low compared to Denmark.

Authors:  Kira Amalie Sten; Emma Elisabeth Højgaard; Marie Balslev Backe; Michael Lynge Pedersen; Nils Skovgaard; Stig Andersen; Nadja Albertsen
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.941

5.  Does bone mineral density improve the predictive accuracy of fracture risk assessment? A prospective cohort study in Northern Denmark.

Authors:  Paula Dhiman; Stig Andersen; Peter Vestergaard; Tahir Masud; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.