Literature DB >> 24479819

Laparoscopic ureterolysis and omental wrapping in patients with retroperitoneal fibrosis and obstructive uropathy: a single-center experience.

Nand Kishore Arvind1, Onkar Singh, Qutub Ali, Janak Singh, Shilpi Singh Gupta, Surbhi Sahay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcomes with mid- to long-term follow-up of laparoscopic ureterolysis (LU) and omental wrapping in retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) with obstructive uropathy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 9 patients with RPF who had obstructive uropathy at presentation and had undergone LU and omental wrapping at our center during January 2004 to June 2012 were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Six females and three males underwent LU for RPF. Underlying causes of RPF could not be found in 8 (89%) cases. Two patients underwent bilateral LU. Mean operative time and estimated blood loss were 213 minutes (range, 180-280 minutes) and 119 mL (range, 70-200 mL), respectively. No case required conversion to open surgery. The only significant intraoperative complication (1/9 [11%]) was ureteral injury, which was easily repaired intraoperatively. The postoperative complication rate was 44% (4/9). Most complications (75% [3/4]) were minor and did not need specific treatment. The mean follow-up period was 46 months (range, 4-72 months). The success rate at last follow-up was 89%.
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of RPF is still controversial. Any future prospective randomized comparative trials seem unlikely in view of the low incidence of RPF. LU and omental wrapping in the setting of obstructive uropathy are safe and an effective alternative with a high success rate at mid- to long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24479819     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2013.0242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

1.  Idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: clinical features and long-term renal function outcome.

Authors:  Mohamed H Zahran; Yasser Osman; Mohamed A Soltan; Ahmed Elhussein Abolazm; Mostafa K Ghazy; Ahmed M Harraz; Ahmed A Shokeir; Hassan Abol-Enein; Bedeir Ali-El-Dein
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Management of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis from the urologist's perspective.

Authors:  Surcel Cristian; Mirvald Cristian; Pavelescu Cristian; Gingu Constantin; Carmen Savu; Emre Huri; Ioanel Sinescu
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-04

3.  The application of wrapping ureter by a pedicled gastrocolic omentum flap combined with an artificial external scaffold to prevent stoma stenosis in rabbit after ureterocutaneostomy.

Authors:  Shigeng Zhang; Fei Gao; Chong Xue; Nan Zhang; Feng Gao; Shaojiang Li; Jiaming Wen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  [New (and old) aspects of retroperitoneal fibrosis].

Authors:  A S Brandt; N M Dreger; E Müller; S Kukuk; S Roth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Retroperitoneal fibrosis at the Ibn Sina University Hospital of Rabat: about 18 cases].

Authors:  Abdoulazizi Bilgo; Moussokoro Hadja Koné; Youssef Lamzaf; Anissa Benjafaar; Amine Saouli; Tarik Karmouni; Khalid El Khader; Abdellatif Koutani; Ahmed Ibn Attya Andaloussi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-02-10

6.  Retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective clinical data analysis of 30 patients in a 10-year period.

Authors:  Hai-Jiang Zhou; Yong Yan; Biao Zhou; Tian-Fei Lan; Xue-Yan Wang; Chun-Sheng Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Retroperitoneal fibrosis-clinical presentation and outcome analysis from urological perspective.

Authors:  Kunal Kishor Jadhav; Vikash Kumar; Chirag B Punatar; Vinod S Joshi; Sharad N Sagade
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2017-08-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.