Literature DB >> 24479125

A critical comparison of protein microarray fabrication technologies.

Valentin Romanov1, S Nikki Davidoff, Adam R Miles, David W Grainger, Bruce K Gale, Benjamin D Brooks.   

Abstract

Of the diverse analytical tools used in proteomics, protein microarrays possess the greatest potential for providing fundamental information on protein, ligand, analyte, receptor, and antibody affinity-based interactions, binding partners and high-throughput analysis. Microarrays have been used to develop tools for drug screening, disease diagnosis, biochemical pathway mapping, protein-protein interaction analysis, vaccine development, enzyme-substrate profiling, and immuno-profiling. While the promise of the technology is intriguing, it is yet to be realized. Many challenges remain to be addressed to allow these methods to meet technical and research expectations, provide reliable assay answers, and to reliably diversify their capabilities. Critical issues include: (1) inconsistent printed microspot morphologies and uniformities, (2) low signal-to-noise ratios due to factors such as complex surface capture protocols, contamination, and static or no-flow mass transport conditions, (3) inconsistent quantification of captured signal due to spot uniformity issues, (4) non-optimal protocol conditions such as pH, temperature, drying that promote variability in assay kinetics, and lastly (5) poor protein (e.g., antibody) printing, storage, or shelf-life compatibility with common microarray assay fabrication methods, directly related to microarray protocols. Conventional printing approaches, including contact (e.g., quill and solid pin), non-contact (e.g., piezo and inkjet), microfluidics-based, microstamping, lithography, and cell-free protein expression microarrays, have all been used with varying degrees of success with figures of merit often defined arbitrarily without comparisons to standards, or analytical or fiduciary controls. Many microarray performance reports use bench top analyte preparations lacking real-world relevance, akin to "fishing in a barrel", for proof of concept and determinations of figures of merit. This review critiques current protein-based microarray preparation techniques commonly used for analytical and function-based proteomics and their effects on array-based assay performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24479125     DOI: 10.1039/c3an01577g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  23 in total

1.  Integrating plasmonic diagnostics and microfluidics.

Authors:  Lifang Niu; Nan Zhang; Hong Liu; Xiaodong Zhou; Wolfgang Knoll
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.800

2.  Novel Nanoplasmonic-Structure-Based Integrated Microfluidic Biosensors for Label-Free in Situ Immune Functional Analysis: A review of recent progress.

Authors:  Chuanyu Wang; Yuxin Cai; Alana MacLACHLAN; Pengyu Chen
Journal:  IEEE Nanotechnol Mag       Date:  2020-02-03

3.  Single molecule protein patterning using hole mask colloidal lithography.

Authors:  William Lum; Dinesh Gautam; Jixin Chen; Laura B Sagle
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 7.790

4.  Meta-Analysis of Human Antibodies Against Plasmodium falciparum Variable Surface and Merozoite Stage Antigens.

Authors:  Eizo Takashima; Bernard N Kanoi; Hikaru Nagaoka; Masayuki Morita; Ifra Hassan; Nirianne M Q Palacpac; Thomas G Egwang; Toshihiro Horii; Jesse Gitaka; Takafumi Tsuboi
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 8.786

5.  Magnet Patterned Superparamagnetic Fe3 O4 /Au Core-Shell Nanoplasmonic Sensing Array for Label-Free High Throughput Cytokine Immunoassay.

Authors:  Yuxin Cai; Jingyi Zhu; Jiacheng He; Wen Yang; Chao Ma; Feng Xiong; Feng Li; Weiqiang Chen; Pengyu Chen
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  On chip preconcentration and fluorescence labeling of model proteins by use of monolithic columns: device fabrication, optimization, and automation.

Authors:  Rui Yang; Jayson V Pagaduan; Ming Yu; Adam T Woolley
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.142

7.  Acoustic Patterning of Growth Factor for Three-Dimensional Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Yaser Shanjani; Sean Michael Siebert; Dai Fei Elmer Ker; Angel E Mercado-Pagán; Yunzhi Peter Yang
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  High Throughput Traction Force Microscopy for Multicellular Islands on Combinatorial Microarrays.

Authors:  Ian C Berg; Gregory H Underhill
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2019-11-05

9.  Reagent integration and controlled release for multiplexed nucleic acid testing in disposable thermoplastic 2D microwell arrays.

Authors:  S Padmanabhan; A Sposito; M Yeh; M Everitt; I White; D L DeVoe
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.800

10.  Composable Microfluidic Plates (cPlate): A Simple and Scalable Fluid Manipulation System for Multiplexed Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA).

Authors:  Ziyi He; Justin Huffman; Kathrine Curtin; Krista L Garner; Elizabeth C Bowdridge; Xiaojun Li; Timothy R Nurkiewicz; Peng Li
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 6.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.