Literature DB >> 24478321

Preference for involvement in treatment decisions and request for prognostic information in newly diagnosed patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes.

F Efficace1, G Gaidano, M Sprangers, F Cottone, M Breccia, M T Voso, G Caocci, R Stauder, A A Di Tucci, G Sanpaolo, D Selleslag, E Angelucci, U Platzbecker, F Mandelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The main objective of this study was to assess preferences for involvement in treatment decisions and requests for prognostic information in newly diagnosed higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. PATIENT AND METHODS: This was a prospective cohort observational study that consecutively enrolled MDS patients with an international prognostic scoring system (IPSS) risk category of intermediate-2 or high risk (summarized as 'higher risk'). The control preference scale was used to assess patient preferences for involvement in treatment decisions, and whether a request by patients for prognostic information during consultation was made, was also recorded. All of the patients were surveyed at the time of diagnosis before receiving treatment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to assess how sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory data related to decision-making preferences and requests for prognostic information. Relationship with the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) profile was also examined.
RESULTS: A total of 280 patients were enrolled, 74% with intermediate-2 and 26% with high-risk IPSS. The mean age of patients was 70-year old (range: 32-89 years). One hundred thirty-two patients (47%) favored a passive role in treatment decision-making, whereas only 14% favored an active role. The remaining 39% of patients favored a shared decision-making approach. Patients with lower hemoglobin levels were more likely to prefer a passive role (P=0.037). HRQOL was generally better in patients preferring an active role versus those preferring a passive one. Overall, 61% (N=171) of patients requested prognostic information on survival during consultation. The likelihood of not requesting prognostic information was higher for older patients (P = 0.003) and for those with lower education (P=0.010).
CONCLUSION: Decision-making preferences vary among patients with newly diagnosed higher-risk MDS. Current findings suggest that patients with worse underlying health conditions are more likely to prefer less involvement in treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision-making; elderly patients; information; myelodysplastic syndromes; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24478321     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  15 in total

1.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation in MDS: undervalued and underutilized.

Authors:  M R Grunwald; B R Avalos; E A Copelan
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.483

2.  Shared decision making in patients at risk of cancer: the role of domain and numeracy.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Talya Miron-Shatz; Jonathan J Rolison; Zehra Omer; Elisa Ozanne
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  Cancer patients' control preferences in decision making and associations with patient-reported outcomes: a prospective study in an outpatient cancer center.

Authors:  Markus Schuler; Jan Schildmann; Freya Trautmann; Leopold Hentschel; Beate Hornemann; Anke Rentsch; Gerhard Ehninger; Jochen Schmitt
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Factors associated with a preference for disclosure of life expectancy information from physicians: a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy.

Authors:  Megumi Uchida; Chikao Sugie; Michio Yoshimura; Eiji Suzuki; Yuta Shibamoto; Masahiro Hiraoka; Tatsuo Akechi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Decision-making by cancer patients and the role of a counselling facility for complementary and alternative medicine: a cohort study.

Authors:  Lena Josfeld; Jutta Hübner; Vanessa Hack; Christian Keinki; Jens Büntzel
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.322

6.  Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with Onco-hematological Diseases.

Authors:  Giorgio La Nasa; Giovanni Caocci; Emanuela Morelli; Elena Massa; Antonio Farci; Laura Deiana; Elisa Pintus; Mario Scartozzi; Federica Sancassiani
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2020-07-30

7.  Does quality of life impact the decision to pursue stem cell transplantation for elderly patients with advanced MDS?

Authors:  A El-Jawahri; H T Kim; D P Steensma; A M Cronin; R M Stone; C D Watts; Y-B Chen; C S Cutler; R J Soiffer; G A Abel
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 8.  [Treatment decisions in oncology : Walking the tightrope between honesty and hope, lifetime, and quality of life].

Authors:  S Walter; C Keinki; J Hübner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 9.  Optimizing Communication and Adherence to Iron Chelation Therapy From Diagnosis to Treatment in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Authors:  Jayshree Shah; Phyllis McKiernan
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01

10.  The Treatment Decision-making Preferences of Patients with Prostate Cancer Should Be Recorded in Research and Clinical Routine: a Pooled Analysis of Four Survey Studies with 7169 Patients.

Authors:  Andreas Ihrig; I Maatouk; H C Friederich; M Baunacke; C Groeben; R Koch; C Thomas; J Huber
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 1.771

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.