Literature DB >> 24478238

Use of prototyping in preoperative planning for patients with head and neck tumors.

Terence Pires de Farias1, Fernando Luiz Dias, Mário Sérgio Galvão, Edson Boasquevisque, Ana Carolina Pastl, Bruno Albuquerque Sousa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prototyping technologies for reconstructions consist of obtaining a 3-dimensional model of the object of interest. Solid models are constructed by the deposition of materials in successive layers. The purpose of this study was to perform a double-blind, randomized, prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of prototype use in head and neck surgeries.
METHODS: Thirty-seven cases were randomized into prototype and nonprototype groups. The following factors were recorded: the time of plate and locking screw apposition, flap size, time for reconstruction, and an aesthetic evaluation.
RESULTS: The prototype group exhibited a reduced surgical time (43.7 minutes vs 127.7 minutes, respectively; p = .001), a tendency to reduce the size of the bone flap taken for reconstruction, and better aesthetic results than the group that was not prototyped.
CONCLUSION: The use of prototyping demonstrated a trend toward a reduced surgical time, smaller bone flaps, and better aesthetic results.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck tumors; mandibular reconstruction; microsurgery reconstruction; prototyping medical models; rapid prototyping

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24478238     DOI: 10.1002/hed.23540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  6 in total

1.  Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Patrick Mills; Richard Duszak; Jeffery A Weisman; Frank J Rybicki; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity.

Authors:  Masaki Azuma; Toru Yanagawa; Naomi Ishibashi-Kanno; Fumihiko Uchida; Takaaki Ito; Kenji Yamagata; Shogo Hasegawa; Kaoru Sasaki; Koji Adachi; Katsuhiko Tabuchi; Mitsuru Sekido; Hiroki Bukawa
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 3.  3D-printing techniques in a medical setting: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Philip Tack; Jan Victor; Paul Gemmel; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 4.  Clinical efficacy and effectiveness of 3D printing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura E Diment; Mark S Thompson; Jeroen H M Bergmann
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  New frontiers and emerging applications of 3D printing in ENT surgery: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  P Canzi; M Magnetto; S Marconi; P Morbini; S Mauramati; F Aprile; I Avato; F Auricchio; M Benazzo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 6.  Comparing the use of conventional and three-dimensional printing (3DP) in mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Ailis Truscott; Reza Zamani; Mohammad Akrami
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.