Literature DB >> 24477863

Regional variation across the United States in management and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: analysis of the 2003 to 2010 nationwide inpatient sample database.

Dhaval Kolte1, Sahil Khera, Wilbert S Aronow, Marjan Mujib, Chandrasekar Palaniswamy, Ali Ahmed, William H Frishman, Gregg C Fonarow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Regional differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) within the United States remain poorly understood. HYPOTHESIS: Treatment choice and outcomes in patients with STEMI differ between regions within the United States.
METHODS: We used the 2003 to 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases to identify all patients age ≥ 40 years hospitalized with STEMI. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to region: Northeast, Midwest, South, and West. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify differences in treatment choice and outcomes (in-hospital mortality, acute stroke, and cardiogenic shock) among the 4 regions.
RESULTS: Of 1,990,486 patients age ≥ 40 years with STEMI, 350,073 (17.6%) were hospitalized in the Northeast, 483,323 (24.3%) in the Midwest, 784,869 (39.4%) in the South, and 372,222 (18.7%) in the West. Compared with the Northeast, patients in the Midwest, South, and West were less likely to receive medical therapy alone and more likely to receive percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was higher in the Midwest (odds ratio [OR]: 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.09, P <0.001), South (OR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, P = 0.001), and West (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.08, P <0.001), as compared with the Northeast. When adjusted further for regional variation in treatment selection, risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was even higher in the Midwest, West, and South.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher reperfusion and revascularization rates, STEMI patients in the Midwest, West, and South have paradoxically higher risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality as compared with patients in the Northeast.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24477863      PMCID: PMC6649537          DOI: 10.1002/clc.22250

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cardiol        ISSN: 0160-9289            Impact factor:   2.882


  8 in total

1.  Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Sri Harsha Patlolla; Shannon M Dunlay; Abhiram Prasad; Malcolm R Bell; Allan S Jaffe; Bernard J Gersh; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Gregory W Barsness
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Regional Variation in Postoperative Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Vascular Surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Andrea M Steely; Peter W Callas; Daniel Neal; Salvatore T Scali; Philip P Goodney; Andres Schanzer; Jack L Cronenwett; Daniel J Bertges
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 1.466

3.  Association Between Ambulatory Care Utilization and Coronary Artery Disease Outcomes by Race/Ethnicity.

Authors:  Eun Ji Kim; Victoria A Parker; Jane M Liebschutz; Joseph Conigliaro; Jean DeGeorge; Amresh D Hanchate
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Regional variations in the process of care for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan.

Authors:  Satoshi Shoji; Kyohei Yamaji; Alexander T Sandhu; Nobuhiro Ikemura; Yasuyuki Shiraishi; Taku Inohara; Paul A Heidenreich; Tetsuya Amano; Yuji Ikari; Shun Kohsaka
Journal:  Lancet Reg Health West Pac       Date:  2022-03-15

5.  Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries.

Authors:  Paula M Janssen; Katrine van Overhagen; Jan Vinklárek; Bob Roozenbeek; H Bart van der Worp; Charles B Majoie; Michal Bar; David Černík; Roman Herzig; Lubomir Jurák; Svatopluk Ostrý; Robert Mikulik; Hester F Lingsma; Diederik W J Dippel
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2022-01-31

6.  Variation in Care for Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome in the United States.

Authors:  Brian E Lacy; Haridarshan Patel; Annie Guérin; Katherine Dea; Justin L Scopel; Reza Alaghband; Eric Qiong Wu; Reema Mody
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Patient and hospital determinants of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in England, 2003-2013.

Authors:  M Hall; K Laut; T B Dondo; O A Alabas; R A Brogan; N Gutacker; R Cookson; P Norman; A Timmis; M de Belder; P F Ludman; C P Gale
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Racial/ethnic disparities among Asian Americans in inpatient acute myocardial infarction mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Eun Ji Kim; Nancy R Kressin; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Lenny Lopez; Jennifer E Rosen; Mengyun Lin; Amresh D Hanchate
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.