Literature DB >> 2447771

Overview of the clinical pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs.

R L Woosley1, C Funck-Brentano.   

Abstract

Antiarrhythmic drugs have been recognized to possess 1 or more classes of antiarrhythmic action. This classification scheme is useful, but has major limitations because the available drugs and their metabolites have multiple actions. This report presents an overview of the distinguishing features of the most frequently used agents having class I or III actions. Agents with class I actions are local anesthetic agents that depress the fast inward depolarizing sodium current and thereby slow the rate of the rise of the action potential (phase 0). This category is further divided into classes IA, IB, and IC according to the degree of potency as sodium channel inhibitors, and the individual effects of the drug on action potential, conduction velocity and repolarization. Included in the spectrum of agents with class I action are quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lidocaine, tocainide, mexiletine, flecainide, amiodarone, encainide and lorcainide. The antiarrhythmic drugs that exert class III action lengthen repolarization and refractoriness; included in this category are amiodarone, quinidine, bretylium and sotalol. Because of the broad range of effects that antiarrhythmic agents may exert, safe and effective therapy requires a thorough familiarity with the pharmacologic profile of each drug administered and a careful evaluation of the presenting condition and the patient history. In some cases, a multiple drug regimen may be most appropriate. Various combinations such as class IA and IB agents, have been shown to slow conduction synergistically and increase refractoriness while keeping adverse effects to a minimum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2447771     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90741-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacology of myocardial calcium-handling.

Authors:  Julia Vogler; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2012-06-16

Review 2.  A prolonged QTc interval. Is it an important effect of antiarrhythmic drugs?

Authors:  F A Fish; D M Roden
Journal:  Med Toxicol Adverse Drug Exp       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

3.  Study of the intraplantar injection of lidocaine and morphine on pain perception and the influence of morphine dependence and withdrawal on lidocaine-induced analgesia in rats.

Authors:  Taraneh Moini Zanjani; Masoumeh Sabetkasaei
Journal:  Iran Biomed J       Date:  2010-10

Review 4.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiarrhythmic drugs. Rationale and current status.

Authors:  R Latini; A P Maggioni; A Cavalli
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Effects of cardiovascular disease on pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  V Rodighiero
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 6.  Pharmacologic Management for Ventricular Arrhythmias: Overview of Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs.

Authors:  John Larson; Lucas Rich; Amrish Deshmukh; Erin C Judge; Jackson J Liang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Cardiac sodium channel inhibition by lamotrigine: In vitro characterization and clinical implications.

Authors:  Lindsey Ingleby-Talecki; Sven C van Dijkman; Sean P Oosterholt; Oscar Della Pasqua; Christina Winter; Marianne Cunnington; Linda Rebar; Sergio Forero-Schwanhaeuser; Vickas Patel; James A Cooper; Anthony Bahinski; Khuram W Chaudhary
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.438

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.