Literature DB >> 24477506

Hand-carried and high-end ultrasound systems are equally inferior to abdominal radiography and multidetector computed tomography in the diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum.

S Schleder, E M Jung, P Heiss, C Stroszczynski, A G Schreyer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Pneumoperitoneum (PP) is a severe finding in emergency departments. Its quick and correct diagnosis is indispensable for the further treatment of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical value of abdominal ultrasound performed with a modern hand-carried ultrasound (HCU) device as well as with a high-end ultrasound (HUS) system in the diagnosis of PP in patients with acute abdominal pain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 31 patients with acute abdominal pain were enrolled in this study irrespective of their underlying disease, and examination with a latest generation HCU and a newest generation HUS was performed. Diagnosis of PP was based on findings of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and abdominal radiography (AR) as the standard of reference. The study was carried out by two independent and experienced examiners unaware of the diagnosis made by MDCT or AR.
RESULTS: In five (16 %) patients PP was identified by MDCT and AR. Examination with HCU was calculated with a sensitivity and specificity of 80 % and 81 %, respectively. Examination with HUS yielded a sensitivity and specificity of 80 % and 89 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION: PP can be detected by HCU and HUS with almost equal accuracy in patients with acute abdominal pain but both methods are inferior compared to MDCT and AR. However, HCU and HUS can accelerate the triage of patients and help to make decisions regarding the necessity of further examinations without the need for radiation and while reducing economic and logistic resources. KEY POINTS: 1. Pneumoperitoneum (PP) is a severe finding in emergency departments. 2. Hand-carried (HCU) and high-end (HUS) ultrasound systems can be helpful in detecting PP. 3. Abdominal radiography (AR) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) are superior in detecting PP. 4. HCU and HUS can accelerate the triage of patients. 5. HCU and HUS can be helpful when making decisions regarding the necessity of further examinations. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24477506     DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1356222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  3 in total

1.  Ultrasound findings in critical care patients: the "liver sign" and other abnormal abdominal air patterns.

Authors:  Joseph Dahine; Annie Giard; David-Olivier Chagnon; André Denault
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2016-03-11

Review 2.  Diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for gastrointestinal pathology: state of the art from basics to advanced.

Authors:  Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Arif Alper Cevik
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Wireless point-of-care ultrasound: First experiences with a new generation handheld device.

Authors:  E M Jung; J Dinkel; N Verloh; M Brandenstein; C Stroszczynski; F Jung; J Rennert
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.375

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.