Literature DB >> 24476745

Session ratings of perceived exertion responses during resistance training bouts equated for total work but differing in work rate.

Justin A Kraft1, James M Green, Kyle R Thompson.   

Abstract

Session ratings of perceived exertion (SRPE) during resistance training may be influenced by specific exercise parameters. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of work rate (total work per unit time) and recording time on SRPE. Participants performed 3 exercise bouts of bench press, lat pull-down, overhead press, upright row, triceps extension, and biceps curl at 60% of predetermined 1 repetition maximum according to these protocols: (a) 3 sets × 8 repetitions (reps) × 1.5 minutes of recovery, (b) 3 sets × 8 reps × 3 minutes of recovery, and (c) 2 sets × 12 reps × 3 minutes of recovery. Session ratings of perceived exertion for the 3 × 8 × 1.5-minute recovery (5.3 ± 1.8) and 2 × 12 × 3-minute recovery trials (6.2 ± 1.7) were significantly greater vs. 3 × 8 × 3-minute recovery trial (4.2 ± 1.8). The difference approached significance between work rate-matched protocols (p = 0.08). No difference was observed between SRPE at 15 minutes (5.1 ± 1.8) vs. 30 minutes (5.2 ± 1.9) post exercise. Post-set in-task ratings of perceived exertion were higher for the 2 × 12 × 3-minute recovery trial (5.9 ± 1.4) vs. 3 × 8 × 1.5-minute recovery trial (4.8 ± 1.2) and 3 × 8 × 3-minute recovery trial (4.0 ± 1.6). The difference approached significance (p = 0.07) for the 3 × 8 × 3-minute recovery trial vs. 3 × 8 × 1.5-minute recovery trial. Session ratings of perceived exertion responded to changes in work rate with no significant difference at matched work rates, indicating that SRPE is responsive to training load. Results indicated that more proximal monitoring (15 minutes post exercise) yielded reliable estimates of SRPE increasing the practical utility of the measure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24476745     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31829b569c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  8 in total

Review 1.  Training Monitoring for Resistance Exercise: Theory and Applications.

Authors:  Brendan R Scott; Grant M Duthie; Heidi R Thornton; Ben J Dascombe
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  ENERGY SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT AND LOAD MANAGEMENT THROUGH THE REHABILITATION AND RETURN TO PLAY PROCESS.

Authors:  Scot Morrison; Patrick Ward; Gregory R duManoir
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

3.  Nutritional Intake and Training Load of Professional Female Football Players during a Mid-Season Microcycle.

Authors:  César Leão; António Pedro Mendes; Catarina Custódio; Mafalda Ng; Nuno Ribeiro; Nuno Loureiro; João Pedro Araújo; José Afonso; Sílvia Rocha-Rodrigues; Francisco Tavares
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-21       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  The Torque Referenced to a Perceived Exertion Level Is Affected by the Type of Movement in Men With Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Frederico Ribeiro Neto; Rodrigo Rodrigues Gomes Costa; Bruna Pereira Avelar; Silvio Assis de Oliveira Junior; Aline Martins de Toledo; Rodrigo Luiz Carregaro
Journal:  Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil       Date:  2021-01-20

5.  Strength and Conditioning Coaches' Application of the Session Rating of Perceived Exertion Method of Monitoring within Professional Rugby Union.

Authors:  Thomas Comyns; Aoife Hannon
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Match and Training Load Exposure and Time-Loss Incidence in Elite Rugby Union Players.

Authors:  Ben E W Cousins; John G Morris; Caroline Sunderland; Anthony M Bennett; Golnaz Shahtahmassebi; Simon B Cooper
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Convergent Validity of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Resistance Exercise in Healthy Participants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  John W D Lea; Jamie M O'Driscoll; Sabina Hulbert; James Scales; Jonathan D Wiles
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-01-08

8.  Hypotensive Responses of Reciprocal Supersets versus Traditional Resistance Training in Apparently Healthy Men.

Authors:  Claudio M Bentes; Pablo B Costa; Victor G Corrêa Neto; Roberto Simão; Gabriel A Paz; Marianna F Maia; Tiago Figueiredo; Gabriel R Neto; Jefferson S Novaes; Humberto Miranda
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2017-05-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.