Literature DB >> 24476476

Positive effect of specific low-frequency electrical stimulation during short-term recovery on subsequent high-intensity exercise.

François Bieuzen1, Rachel Borne, Jean-François Toussaint, Christophe Hausswirth.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test how low-frequency electrical stimulation (LFES; Veinoplus Sport (AdRem Technology, Paris, France)) of the calf muscles affects recovery indices compared with 2 other commonly used recovery methods (active, ACT; passive, PAS). The tests used assessed predominantly anaerobic performance after short-term (15 min) recovery, and the kinetics of blood markers. Fourteen highly trained female handball players completed 2 Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery tests (level 2; YYIR2) separated by a 15-min recovery period. During recovery, 1 of 3 recovery methods (ACT, LFES or PAS) was randomly selected. Performance (i.e., distance run) was measured at the end of each YYIR2 test. Blood lactate, pH, bicarbonate concentrations, heart rate, respiratory gas exchange and tissue saturation index for the lateral gastrocnemius were recorded. LFES showed a very likely beneficial effect on performance during the second YYIR2 relative to PAS and a possible beneficial effect relative to ACT (distance Pre vs. Post; LFES: -1.8%; ACT: -7.6%; PAS: -15.9%). Compared with PAS recovery, LFES and ACT recovery clearly showed a faster return to baseline for blood lactate, pH and bicarbonate concentrations during the recovery period. LFES of the calf muscles and, to a lesser extent, ACT recovery appear to effectively improve short-term recovery between 2 bouts of exhausting exercises. These methods could be of benefit if applied during half-time, for sports involving successive rounds, or where only a limited recovery period is available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24476476     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2013-0185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  5 in total

1.  Similar Recovery of Maximal Cycling Performance after Ischemic Preconditioning, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation or Active Recovery in Endurance Athletes.

Authors:  Pénélope Paradis-Deschênes; Julien Lapointe; Denis R Joanisse; François Billaut
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Muscle Oximetry in Sports Science: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stephane Perrey; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Olivier Dupuy; Wafa Douzi; Dimitri Theurot; Laurent Bosquet; Benoit Dugué
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Comparison of Different Recovery Strategies After High-Intensity Functional Training: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rafael Martínez-Gómez; Pedro L Valenzuela; Alejandro Lucia; David Barranco-Gil
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Is Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation a Tool for Recovery after a Water Rescue? A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards.

Authors:  Roberto Barcala-Furelos; Alicia González-Represas; Ezequiel Rey; Alicia Martínez-Rodríguez; Anton Kalén; Olga Marques; Luís Rama
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.