Literature DB >> 24476089

Risk assessment of inbreeding and outbreeding depression in a captive-breeding program.

Njal Rollinson1, Dave M Keith, Aimee Lee S Houde, Paul V Debes, Meghan C McBride, Jeffrey A Hutchings.   

Abstract

Captive-breeding programs can be implemented to preserve the genetic diversity of endangered populations such that the controlled release of captive-bred individuals into the wild may promote recovery. A common difficulty, however, is that programs are founded with limited wild broodstock, and inbreeding can become increasingly difficult to avoid with successive generations in captivity. Program managers must choose between maintaining the genetic purity of populations, at the risk of inbreeding depression, or interbreeding populations, at the risk of outbreeding depression. We evaluate these relative risks in a captive-breeding program for 3 endangered populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). In each of 2 years, we released juvenile F(1) and F(2) interpopulation hybrids, backcrosses, as well as inbred and noninbred within-population crosstypes into 9 wild streams. Juvenile size and survival was quantified in each year. Few crosstype effects were observed, but interestingly, the relative fitness consequences of inbreeding and outbreeding varied from year to year. Temporal variation in environmental quality might have driven some of these annual differences, by exacerbating the importance of maternal effects on juvenile fitness in a year of low environmental quality and by affecting the severity of inbreeding depression differently in different years. Nonetheless, inbreeding was more consistently associated with a negative effect on fitness, whereas the consequences of outbreeding were less predictable. Considering the challenges associated with a sound risk assessment in the wild and given that the effect of inbreeding on fitness is relatively predictable, we suggest that risk can be weighted more strongly in terms of the probable outcome of outbreeding. Factors such as genetic similarities between populations and the number of generations in isolation can sometimes be used to assess outbreeding risk, in lieu of experimentation.
© 2014 Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COSEWIC; adaptación local; banco de genes vivos; calidad ambiental; colapso de población; criadero; efectos maternales; egg size; environmental quality; hatchery; heterosis; live gene banking; local adaptation; maternal effects; population collapse; population viability; tamaño del huevo; viabilidad poblacional

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24476089     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  5 in total

1.  Increased natural reproduction and genetic diversity one generation after cessation of a steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) conservation hatchery program.

Authors:  Barry A Berejikian; Donald M Van Doornik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Founder events, isolation, and inbreeding: Intercontinental genetic structure of the domestic ferret.

Authors:  Kyle D Gustafson; Michelle G Hawkins; Tracy L Drazenovich; Robert Church; Susan A Brown; Holly B Ernest
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Sex-specific effects of outbreeding on offspring quality in pike (Esox lucius).

Authors:  Johanna Sunde; Petter Tibblin; Per Larsson; Anders Forsman
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Genetic management on the brink of extinction: sequencing microsatellites does not improve estimates of inbreeding in wild and captive Vancouver Island marmots (Marmota vancouverensis).

Authors:  Kimberley G Barrett; Geneviève Amaral; Melanie Elphinstone; Malcolm L McAdie; Corey S Davis; Jasmine K Janes; John Carnio; Axel Moehrenschlager; Jamieson C Gorrell
Journal:  Conserv Genet       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 2.538

5.  How well do genetic markers inform about responses to intraspecific admixture? A comparative analysis of microsatellites and RADseq.

Authors:  Yeşerin Yıldırım; Anders Forsman; Johanna Sunde
Journal:  BMC Genom Data       Date:  2021-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.