Literature DB >> 24475324

Prevalence of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia resistance gene and its linkage to Tn5281 in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from Tabriz hospitals.

Amir Behnood1, Safar Farajnia2, Seyed Reza Moaddab3, Shiva Ahdi-Khosroshahi4, Aliakbar Katayounzadeh5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: High-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR: MIC ≥ 500 µg/ml) in Enterococci is mediated by aminoglycoside modifying enzymes which is mainly encoded by aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia gene. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia gene in clinical isolates of Enterococcus facium and Enterococcus faecalis collected from hospitals in northwest of Iran.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the present study a total of 111 enterococcus isolates were collected from 4 hospitals during a two year period (July 2009-August 2011). Bacterial identification and species determination were carried out by standard biochemical tests. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated by Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method. MICs were determined by agar dilution method. The frequency of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia gene in the isolates was determined by PCR. The carriage of resistance gene on Tn5281 transposon was identified by long PCR and dot-blot hybridization methods.
RESULTS: Antibiotic susceptibility tests revealed that the highest resistance was against streptomycin (74.77%) and erythromycin (67.58%) whereas the highest susceptibility was observed to vancomycin (81.1%). 36 isolates (32.43%) were identified as HLGR, 34(94.44%) of them had resistant gene in their genome. Long PCR studies revealed that 88% of HLGR clinical isolates harboured Tn5281. The aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia resistance gene was present on Tn5281 transposon in all 32 isolates according to dot blot hybridization test.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicated that aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia resistance gene is highly prevalent in gentamicin resistant isolates. Carriage of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia resistance gene on Tn5281 transposable element suggests possible contribution of this transposone on dissemination of resistance gene among enterococcus isolates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dot-Blot hybridization; Enterococci; High-level gentamicin resistance (HLGR); Long PCR

Year:  2013        PMID: 24475324      PMCID: PMC3895555     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Microbiol        ISSN: 2008-3289


INTRODUCTION

Enterococcus (E) faecalis and E. faecium are normal floras of human and animals digestive system, however they are also known as occasional human pathogens responsible for community-acquired and nosocomial infections (1). These bacteria are found in the gastrointestinal and female urinary tracts as part of the normal host flora in healthy individuals where they cause infections (1, 2). Current studies show that these organisms have emerged as a leading cause of nosocomial infections in hospitals. Most of the enterococcal infections are due to E. faecalis isolate. E. faecium is responsible for minority of enterococcal infections (3). Clinical treatments for serious enterococcal infections require a combination of a cell wall active agent and an aminoglycoside, typically gentamicin (4, 5). Enterococcus species can acquire high-level resistance to a variety of antibiotics by horizontal transfer of mobile genetic determinants, in addition to the intrinsic resistance to several groups of antimicrobials (6). Resistance to the aminoglycosides usually occurs by enzymatic modification of the antibiotics by aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AME) (7). The first case of high-level gentamicin-resistant (HLGR) E. faecalis isolate was reported by Thal and his colleagues (1979) in France (8). Further investigations showed that the reason for high-level resistance to gentamicin antibiotics was due to the fusion of two aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme genes. The resultant bifunctional aac(6')-aph(2″) aminoglycoside modifying enzyme confers resistance to all clinically useful aminoglycosides except streptomycin. The genes responsible for high-level aminoglycoside resistance have in most cases been identified on plasmids (9). Previous investigations have reported the aac(6')-aph(2″) gene as being part of a transposable element Tn5281 (10, 11). Relation of aac(6')-aph(2″) with a transposon facilitates rapid distribution of the resistance gene. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of HLGR in clinical isolates of E. faecalis and E. faecium and to determine the molecular basis of the gene responsible for HLGR in these isolates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial isolates

A total of 111 Enterococcal isolates were collected from 4 different hospitals in Tabriz, northwest of Iran during July 2009 to August 2011. The identification of the isolates was confirmed with standard biochemical tests. E. faecalis strain HH22, containing the HLGR-conferring transposon Tn5281, and E. faecalis ATTCC 29212 were used as a positive and negative controls, respectively (12).

Susceptibility testing

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by Disc diffusion method (Kirby-Baur) according to the CLSI guidelines (13). The following antibiotics were tested: streptomycin, erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, ampicillin, tetracycline, penicillin, vancomycin, and gentamicin. 120 μg gentamicin discs (MAST, UK) were used for identification of high level gentamicin resistant strains. The MIC was determined by agar dilution method. High-level gentamicin resistance was defined as MIC ≥ 500 µg/ml. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to three or more antimicrobial classes.

Detection of aac6′-aph2″ by PCR

PCR was performed to amplify the bifunctional aac(6')-aph(2″) gene sequences. Bacterial cells were lysed and DNA extracted as described by Regnault (14). Primers 5'CCAAGAGCAATAAGGGCATA3'and 5'CACTATCATAACCACTACCG3' were used as forward and reverse primers to obtain PCR product of approximately 400 bp. PCR master mix components were as follows; 10X PCR buffer in final concentration of 1X, MgCl2 (50mM) in a final concentration of 1.5 mM, dNTP Mix, 10 mM in a final concentration of 0.2 mM and forward and reverse primers in a final concentration of 0.4 μM. PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 25 μl. Thermal cycling was performed by initial denaturation at 94°C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles of 60 seconds denaturation at 94°C; 60 seconds annealing at 65°C; 45 seconds extension at 72°C with a final extension at 72°C for 7 minutes. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose gel and visualized by gel documentation system (Uvitec, UK) after staining with ethidium bromide (15).

Plasmid extraction

For isolation of plasmid harboring Tn528 transposone, all isolates that were positive for aac(6')-aph(2″) gene subjected to plasmid extraction following the method described by Woodford et al (16).

Long PCR

To identify the isolates containing Tn5281 transposone, a long PCR was carried out with a single primer 5’-CAGAACAGCTGGATCCTATGG-3’ using plasmid extracts as templates. The reaction mixture for long PCR was prepared according to the instructions of manufacturer (Roche diagnostics, Germany). The thermal cycling for amplification of Tn5281 transposone has shown in Table 1. Products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and photographed to determine the 3.4Kb product.
Table 1

Thermal cycling condition for amplification of Tn5281 transposone by long PCR.

StageTemperatureTimeCycles
Initial denaturation94°C4 min1
Denaturation94°C10 s
Annealing57°C30 s
Extension68°C45 s10
Denaturation94°C15 s
Annealing57°C30 s25
extension68°C45 s
Final extension68°C7 min1
Cooling4°C10 min
Thermal cycling condition for amplification of Tn5281 transposone by long PCR.

Dot-Blot hybridization

Dot-Blot hybridization method was performed to determine the presence of aac(6')-aph(2″) gene on Tn5281 transposone. 1 μg of plasmid extracts was dissolved in double distilled water to a final volume of 16 μl and denaturized by heating in a boiling water bath for 10 minutes. 4 μl of digoxigenin labeled aac(6')-aph(2″) PCR product was mixed with denaturized plasmid and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37°C. Finally the reaction was stopped by adding 2 μl of 200mM EDTA. A serial dilution of hybridization reactions were applied to a positively charged nylon membrane. Part of the nylon membrane was preloaded with defined dilutions of labeled control DNA which were used as standard. The nylon membrane was subjected to immunological detection with anti-digoxigenin antibody. The intensities of hybridization products and control DNA were compared by exposure to imaging device (17).

RESULTS

Patients and specimens

In this study, 193 clinical specimens from 90 in-patients and 103 out-patients were collected. A total of 111 Enterococci isolates were isolated from 45 in-patients and 66 outpatients. The origin of isolates has shown in Fig. 1. 89 (80.1%) isolates were identified as E. faecalis and 22 (19.8%) were E. faecium.
Fig. 1

Distribution of clinical specimens used for isolation of entrococci.

Distribution of clinical specimens used for isolation of entrococci. Fig. 2 shows the results of disc diffusion tests. The highest resistance rate was found to streptomycin (74.77%) followed by erythromycin (67.58%), tetracycline (60.36%), ciprofloxacin (53.15%), nitrofurantoin (43.24%), ampicillin (39.64%), gentamicin 43 (38.73%) and vancomycin 21(18.9%).
Fig. 2

Results of disk diffusion tests for Enterococcus isolates. (horizontal line: antibiotics; vertical line: Rate of resistant isolates).

Results of disk diffusion tests for Enterococcus isolates. (horizontal line: antibiotics; vertical line: Rate of resistant isolates). The results of MIC revealed that 13 (36.11%) E. faecium isolates and 23 (63.88%) E. faecalis isolates were highly resistant to gentamicin (MIC ≥ 500 µg/ml) (Table 2). Out of 22 E. faecium isolates, 6(27.3%) isolates and out of 89 E. faecalis isolates, 36 (40.44%) isolates were highly resistant to streptomycin. High level resistances to both streptomycin and gentamicin were found in 5 (36.36%) isolates of E. faecium and 14 (15.7%) isolates of E. faecalis.
Table 2

Results of agar dilution test for detection of high-level gentamicin/ streptomycin resistance in Enterococcus isolates.

isolatesnGentamicin(MIC ≥ 500 µg/ml) N (%)Streptomycin(MIC ≥ 2000 µg/ml)N (%)Streptomycin + Gentamicin(MIC ≥ 2000 µg/ml+ MIC ≥ 500 µg/ml)N (%)
E. faecalis 8923 (25.84)36 (40.44)14 (36.36)
E. faecium 2213 (59.09)6 (27.27)5 (15.7)
Results of agar dilution test for detection of high-level gentamicin/ streptomycin resistance in Enterococcus isolates.

PCR analysis

Among 36 isolates that were identified as HLGR (32.43%), the aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia resistance gene was detected in 34(94.4%) isolates. Fig. 3 shows a 365 base pair PCR amplicon associated with high level gentamicin resistance. Two HLGR isolates, were negative for aac(6')-aph(2″) gene in PCR method.
Fig. 3

PCR amplification of aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia gene from HLGR Enterococci.

Line 1: negative control: E. faecalis ATCC29212; Line 2: positive control: E. faecalis HH22; Lane 3, 1 kb size marker; Line 4–6: isolates with the HLGR genotype.

PCR amplification of aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia gene from HLGR Enterococci. Line 1: negative control: E. faecalis ATCC29212; Line 2: positive control: E. faecalis HH22; Lane 3, 1 kb size marker; Line 4–6: isolates with the HLGR genotype.

Plasmid analysis and Dot-blot hybridization

Results from plasmid analysis showed the presence of a plasmid of about 3.5kb in 94.4% of isolates. Dot-Blot hybridization using aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia probe and amplified Tn5281 indicated that aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia gene was located on 3.5Kb Transposon in 32(88%) HLGR isolates. Figs. 4 and 5 show the Long PCR amplification of Tn5281 and Dot-blot hybridization results, respectively.
Fig. 4

PCR amplification of Tn5281 from HLGR isolates. Lane 1, 1 kb size marker; Lanes 2, 4, 5 and 6: positive clinical isolates; Lane 3: positive control (E. faecalis HH22); lane 7: negative control (E. faecalis ATCC29212).

Fig. 5

Dot-Blot hybridization of 32 HLGR isolates; P: positive control (E. faecalis HH22);

N: negative control ( E.faecalis ATCC29212); Dots 1 to 32: HLGR isolates.

PCR amplification of Tn5281 from HLGR isolates. Lane 1, 1 kb size marker; Lanes 2, 4, 5 and 6: positive clinical isolates; Lane 3: positive control (E. faecalis HH22); lane 7: negative control (E. faecalis ATCC29212). Dot-Blot hybridization of 32 HLGR isolates; P: positive control (E. faecalis HH22); N: negative control ( E.faecalis ATCC29212); Dots 1 to 32: HLGR isolates.

DISCUSSION

In recent decades enterococci have emerged as a highly important nosocomial and community-acquired pathogens. Although these bacteria are generally thought to be a low virulence pathogen, it is now unveiled that these organisms can cause serious invasive infections, including endocarditis, bacteremia, urinary tract and pelvic infections. The role of enterococci as a causative agent of various infections has become considerably important, not only for their documented pathogenic potential but also due to increasing antimicrobial resistance (especially resistance to glycopeptides) in most of isolates (18). Aminoglycosides are frequently used in combination with cell wall active antibiotics for severe enterococcal infections. It has shown that the cell wall active agents disrupt the bacterial cell wall to allow the aminoglycoside to enter and exert their bactericidal effects (19, 20). Low-level aminoglycoside resistance is an intrinsic characteristic in all enterococcal species. However, acquired high-level aminoglycoside resistance may be caused by various aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (19, 20). Several studies demonstrated that aminoglycoside high-level resistance genes in enterococci are encoded on plasmids, conjugative elements, or the most commonly on conjugative transposons, that mediate the horizontal transfer of resistance determinants (9, 18, 19). In our study, high-level resistance to gentamicin was observed in 32.43% of isolated enterococci. This frequency is lower than the rates reported by Dadfarma (57.4%, 2010) (24) and Feizabadi (65%, 2008) (25). HLGR was reported in 46.15% of isolates in Italy (18), 45.5% in Brazil (26), 82.3% in Michigan (27), 37.64% in Chicago, (28) and in 46.06% in South Africa (29). The lowest rate (15.7%) of HLGR has been reported from Greece (30). These results demonstrate variation of HLGR prevalence in different geographic regions. High-level resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin was observed in E. faecium isolates in 57.1% and 27.3% of cases and in E. faecalis in 25.8% and 40.4% of isolates, respectively (Table 2). Multidrug resistance was observed in 49.09% of isolates which is a high rate in comparison to other studies carried out in recent years (18–20). Resistance to aminoglycosides usually occurs by enzymatic modification of drugs by aminoglycoside modifying enzymes which are carried on mobile elements such as transposons. The results of this study showed that 88% of HLGR isolates contained Tn5281 among them 94% of isolates carried aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2″)-Ia resistance gene. These findings are consistent with previous report on carriage of HLGR genes on transposons in enterococcus species (18, 19). This finding suggests that aminoglycoside resistance genes are possibly disseminated through the population of enterococci species by Tn5281. In conclusion, the results of this study revealed high prevalence of HLGR genes among enterococcal isolates in the study region. The carriage of resistance gene on mobile element Tn5281 reminded the possibility of dissemination of HLGR among different pathogenic bacteria.
  25 in total

1.  Identification of Enterococcus spp. with a biochemical key.

Authors:  A Manero; A R Blanch
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Antibiotic-resistant enterococci: the mechanisms and dynamics of drug introduction and resistance.

Authors:  Brett D Shepard; Michael S Gilmore
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.700

3.  Multiplex PCR for detection of aminoglycoside resistance genes in enterococci.

Authors:  Sergei B Vakulenko; Susan M Donabedian; Anatoliy M Voskresenskiy; Marcus J Zervos; Stephen A Lerner; Joseph W Chow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Virulence and antimicrobial resistance in clinical Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  Hanna Billström; Bodil Lund; Asa Sullivan; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Molecular epidemiology of high-level aminoglycoside-resistant enterococci isolated from patients in a university hospital in southern Italy.

Authors:  Raffaele Zarrilli; Marie-Francoise Tripodi; Anna Di Popolo; Rosaria Fortunato; Maria Bagattini; Margherita Crispino; Anna Florio; Maria Triassi; Riccardo Utili
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Antimicrobial resistance from enterococci in a pediatric hospital. Plasmids in Enterococcus faecalis isolates with high-level gentamicin and streptomycin resistance.

Authors:  G Miranda; L Lee; C Kelly; F Solórzano; B Leaños; O Muñoz; J E Patterson
Journal:  Arch Med Res       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  High-level resistance to gentamicin in Enterococcus faecium.

Authors:  N Woodford; E McNamara; E Smyth; R C George
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Multilaboratory evaluation of screening methods for detection of high-level aminoglycoside resistance in enterococci. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Study Group on Enterococci.

Authors:  J M Swenson; M J Ferraro; D F Sahm; N C Clark; D H Culver; F C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Transposon Tn5281 is the main distributor of the aminoglycoside modifying enzyme gene among isolates of Enterococcus faecalis in Tehran hospitals.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Feizabadi; Leila Shokrzadeh; Sara Sayady; Soroor Asadi
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological characteristics of bacteremia caused by high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis.

Authors:  A G Vigani; A Macedo de Oliveira; O J Bratfich; R S B Stucchi; M L Moretti
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.590

View more
  7 in total

1.  Vancomycin-resistant enteroccus faecium and enterococcus faecalis isolated from education hospital of iran.

Authors:  Hossein Samadi Kafil; Mohammad Asgharzadeh
Journal:  Maedica (Buchar)       Date:  2014-12

2.  High-level resistance to aminoglycosides and ampicillin among clinical isolates of Enterococcus species in an Iranian referral hospital.

Authors:  Seyed Hossein Mousavi; Hadi Peeri-Doghaheh; Behnam Mohammadi-Ghalehbin; Roghayeh Teimourpour; Dadras Maleki; Farzad Khademi; Mohsen Arzanlou
Journal:  Iran J Microbiol       Date:  2020-08

3.  Clonal dissemination of high-level gentamicin-resistant isolates of Enterococcus faecalis within a university hospital in southeastern Iran.

Authors:  Fereshteh Saffari; Hosein Darehkordi; Roya Ahmadrajabi
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2020-01-28

4.  Assessment of antibiotic susceptibility in Lactobacillus isolates from chickens.

Authors:  Marta Dec; Renata Urban-Chmiel; Dagmara Stępień-Pyśniak; Andrzej Wernicki
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 4.181

5.  Prevalence of Aminoglycoside Resistance Genes in Enterococcus Strains in Kermanshah, Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Amini; Hasan Ali Krimpour; Mahdi Ghaderi; Siavash Vaziri; Shirin Ferdowsi; Mohsen Azizi; Sabrieh Amini
Journal:  Iran J Med Sci       Date:  2018-09

Review 6.  Let Me Upgrade You: Impact of Mobile Genetic Elements on Enterococcal Adaptation and Evolution.

Authors:  Cydney N Johnson; Emma K Sheriff; Breck A Duerkop; Anushila Chatterjee
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Increasing Prevalence of Aminoglycoside-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis Isolates Due to the aac(6')-aph(2") Gene: A Therapeutic Problem in Kermanshah, Iran.

Authors:  Mitra Khani; Mahdie Fatollahzade; Hamid Pajavand; Somaye Bakhtiari; Ramin Abiri
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 0.747

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.