Literature DB >> 24474411

Recognition of minor adult hip dysplasia: which anatomical indices are important?

Felipe Pereira1, Andrew Giles, Gavin Wood, Tim N Board.   

Abstract

The rise in popularity of hip arthroscopy has led to a renewed interest in mild hip dysplasia. There is a lack of clarity in the literature regarding both the diagnosis and management of such patients. The aim of this study was to analyse the relative importance of and the inter-relationship between the classically described anatomical indices of dysplasia.One hundred and fifty hips with varying degrees of hip dysplasia were studied. The following were measured: centre-edge (CE), Sharp's and Tönnis angles, acetabular head index (AHI), and acetabular index of depth to width (AIDW). Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated.Using the CE angle 82 hips were classified as normal and 68 dysplastic. Of the 82 patients with a normal CE angle, 20-39% were dysplastic on at least one other variable. The CE angle did not have a significant correlation to other variables. The remaining four variables showed inter-correlations between 0.26 and 0.54. Overall the Tönnis angle showed the strongest correlation with the other variables. In the patient group with CE angles 21o to 25o (minor dysplasia) 72% of hips had Tönnis angles greater than 10o and 28% had angles greater than or equal to 15o indicating the great variability in the level of dysplasia within this group.In patients with mild dysplasia we have shown that measurement of a single anatomical variable may lead to under-diagnosis. We recommend the measurement the CE angle combined with at least one other variable and suggest the use of the Tönnis angle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474411     DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hip Int        ISSN: 1120-7000            Impact factor:   2.135


  6 in total

1.  Preservation of the rectus femoris origin during periacetabular osteotomy does not compromise acetabular reorientation.

Authors:  Christopher L Peters; Jill A Erickson; Mike B Anderson; Lucas A Anderson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Can the Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) Index Be Used to Distinguish Dysplasia from Impingement?

Authors:  Justin T Smith; Young Jee; Erika Daley; Denise M Koueiter; Martin Beck; Ira Zaltz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Superiority of the modified Tönnis angle over the Tönnis angle in the radiographic diagnosis of acetabular dysplasia.

Authors:  Liangguo Fa; Qing Wang; Xiangxing Ma
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  The management of the painful borderline dysplastic hip.

Authors:  Michael C Wyatt; Martin Beck
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2018-04-05

5.  Computer-Aided System Application Value for Assessing Hip Development.

Authors:  Yaoxian Jiang; Guangyao Yang; Yuan Liang; Qin Shi; Boqi Cui; Xiaodan Chang; Zhaowen Qiu; Xudong Zhao
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Modified FCI (Fédération Cynologique Internationale) Scoring of the Coxofemoral Joint in Labrador Retrievers Without and With Hip Dysplasia.

Authors:  Ayman A Mostafa; Menna A Nahla; Khaled M Ali; Clifford R Berry
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-03-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.