Literature DB >> 24474369

Melodic algorithms for pulse oximetry to allow audible discrimination of abnormal systolic blood pressures.

Ranjit S Chima1, Rafael Ortega, Christopher W Connor.   

Abstract

An anesthesiologist must remain vigilant of the patient's clinical status, incorporating many independent physiological measurements. Oxygen saturation and heart rate are represented by continuous audible tones generated by the pulse oximeter, a mandated monitoring device. Other important clinical parameters--notably blood pressure--lack any audible representation beyond arbitrarily-configured threshold alarms. Attempts to introduce further continuous audible tones have apparently foundered; the complexity and interaction of these tones have exceeded the ability of clinicians to interpret them. Instead, we manipulate the tonal and rhythmic structure of the accepted pulse oximeter tone pattern melodically. Three melodic algorithms were developed to apply tonal and rhythmic variations to the continuous pulse oximeter tone, dependent on the systolic blood pressure. The algorithms distort the original audible pattern minimally, to facilitate comprehension of both the underlying pattern and the applied variations. A panel of anesthesia practitioners (attending anesthesiologists, residents and nurse anesthetists) assessed these algorithms in characterizing perturbations in cardiopulmonary status. Twelve scenarios, incorporating combinations of oxygen desaturation, bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension and hypertension, were tested. A rhythmic variation in which additional auditory information was conveyed only at halftime intervals, with every other "beat" of the pulse oximeter, was strongly favored. The respondents also strongly favored the use of musical chords over single tones. Given three algorithms of tones embedded in the pulse oximeter signal, anesthesiologists preferred a melodic tone to signal a significant change in blood pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474369     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-014-9558-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  11 in total

1.  Continuous auditory monitoring--how much information do we register?

Authors:  R M Craven; A K McIndoe
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Anaesthetists' attitudes to monitoring instrument design options.

Authors:  T Nazir; P C Beatty
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  A laboratory evaluation of an auditory display designed to enhance intraoperative monitoring.

Authors:  Robert G Loeb; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  The sounds of saturation.

Authors:  David C Santamore; Thomas G Cleaver
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Audio spectrum and sound pressure levels vary between pulse oximeters.

Authors:  Deven Chandra; Michael J Tessler; John Usher
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.063

6.  Are melodic medical equipment alarms easily learned?

Authors:  Alexandra N Wee; Penelope M Sanderson
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Triggering of systolic arterial pressure alarms using statistics-based versus threshold alarms.

Authors:  C W Connor; B Gohil; M J Harrison
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Statistics-based alarms from sequential physiological measurements.

Authors:  M J Harrison; C W Connor
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Diagnostic tests. 1: Sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-11

10.  Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.