Literature DB >> 24474218

Scoring system for prediction of lymph node metastasis in radical cystectomy cohort.

Miroslav M Stojadinović1, Rade Prelević, Arso Vukićević.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess whether pretreatment clinical parameters combined with computed tomography can improve the prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, demographic and clinicopathological information (initial transurethral resection [grade, stage, multiplicity of tumors, lymphovascular invasion], hydronephrosis, abdominal and pelvic computed tomography) and the presence of lymph node disease on final pathology of 183 patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were reviewed. Logistic regression and bootstrap methods were used to create an integer score for estimating the risk of positive lymph nodes. Various measures for predictive ability and clinical utility were determined.
RESULTS: On pathological examination, 59.6% of patients had positive lymph nodes. In a multivariable analysis, status lymph nodes on computed tomography and hydronephrosis were the most strongly associated predictors. The resultant total possible score ranged from 0 to 10, with a cut-off value of >4 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.806. Relative integrated discrimination improvement was 14.3%. In the decision curve analysis, the model provided net benefit throughout the entire range of threshold probabilities. However, the final model was roughly equivalent to using the clinical exam.
CONCLUSIONS: The pre-cystectomy scoring system improved the prediction of lymph node status in patients with bladder cancer. Our model represented a user-friendly staging aid, but a large multi-center study should be performed before widespread implementation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474218     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0645-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  30 in total

1.  New metrics for assessing diagnostic potential of candidate biomarkers.

Authors:  John W Pickering; Zoltan H Endre
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Precystectomy nomogram for prediction of advanced bladder cancer stage.

Authors:  Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Ganesh S Palapattu; Paul Perrotte; Yair Lotan; Craig G Rogers; Gilad E Amiel; Amnon Vazina; Amit Gupta; Patrick J Bastian; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Mark Schoenberg; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-06-23       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Accurate preoperative prediction of non-organ-confined bladder urothelial carcinoma at cystectomy.

Authors:  David A Green; Michael Rink; Jens Hansen; Eugene K Cha; Brian Robinson; Zhe Tian; Felix K Chun; Scott Tagawa; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Margit Fisch; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) expression predicts lymph node metastasis of transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Kazumi Suzuki; Tatsuo Morita; Akihiko Tokue
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.369

5.  Comparison of the clinical and pathologic staging in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Sean McLaughlin; Jon Shephard; Eric Wallen; Susan Maygarden; Culley C Carson; Raj S Pruthi
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Elena B Elkin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Principal component analysis based pre-cystectomy model to predict pathological stage in patients with clinical organ-confined bladder cancer.

Authors:  Hamed Ahmadi; Anirban P Mitra; George A Abdelsayed; Jie Cai; Hooman Djaladat; Harman M Bruins; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 8.  Imaging and staging of transitional cell carcinoma: part 1, lower urinary tract.

Authors:  Raghunandan Vikram; Carl M Sandler; Chaan S Ng
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  A precystectomy decision model to predict pathological upstaging and oncological outcomes in clinical stage T2 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra; Eila C Skinner; Gus Miranda; Siamak Daneshmand
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  The impact of lymphadenectomy and lymph node metastasis on the outcomes of radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Karl; Peter R Carroll; Jürgen E Gschwend; Ruth Knüchel; Francesco Montorsi; Christian G Stief; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.