Miroslav M Stojadinović1, Rade Prelević, Arso Vukićević. 1. Department of Urology, Clinic of Urology and Nephrology, Clinical Centre "Kragujevac", Zmaj Jovina 30, 34000, Kragujevac, Serbia, midinac@EUnet.rs.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess whether pretreatment clinical parameters combined with computed tomography can improve the prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, demographic and clinicopathological information (initial transurethral resection [grade, stage, multiplicity of tumors, lymphovascular invasion], hydronephrosis, abdominal and pelvic computed tomography) and the presence of lymph node disease on final pathology of 183 patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were reviewed. Logistic regression and bootstrap methods were used to create an integer score for estimating the risk of positive lymph nodes. Various measures for predictive ability and clinical utility were determined. RESULTS: On pathological examination, 59.6% of patients had positive lymph nodes. In a multivariable analysis, status lymph nodes on computed tomography and hydronephrosis were the most strongly associated predictors. The resultant total possible score ranged from 0 to 10, with a cut-off value of >4 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.806. Relative integrated discrimination improvement was 14.3%. In the decision curve analysis, the model provided net benefit throughout the entire range of threshold probabilities. However, the final model was roughly equivalent to using the clinical exam. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-cystectomy scoring system improved the prediction of lymph node status in patients with bladder cancer. Our model represented a user-friendly staging aid, but a large multi-center study should be performed before widespread implementation.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to assess whether pretreatment clinical parameters combined with computed tomography can improve the prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, demographic and clinicopathological information (initial transurethral resection [grade, stage, multiplicity of tumors, lymphovascular invasion], hydronephrosis, abdominal and pelvic computed tomography) and the presence of lymph node disease on final pathology of 183 patients with bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were reviewed. Logistic regression and bootstrap methods were used to create an integer score for estimating the risk of positive lymph nodes. Various measures for predictive ability and clinical utility were determined. RESULTS: On pathological examination, 59.6% of patients had positive lymph nodes. In a multivariable analysis, status lymph nodes on computed tomography and hydronephrosis were the most strongly associated predictors. The resultant total possible score ranged from 0 to 10, with a cut-off value of >4 points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.806. Relative integrated discrimination improvement was 14.3%. In the decision curve analysis, the model provided net benefit throughout the entire range of threshold probabilities. However, the final model was roughly equivalent to using the clinical exam. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-cystectomy scoring system improved the prediction of lymph node status in patients with bladder cancer. Our model represented a user-friendly staging aid, but a large multi-center study should be performed before widespread implementation.
Authors: Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Ganesh S Palapattu; Paul Perrotte; Yair Lotan; Craig G Rogers; Gilad E Amiel; Amnon Vazina; Amit Gupta; Patrick J Bastian; Arthur I Sagalowsky; Mark Schoenberg; Seth P Lerner Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: David A Green; Michael Rink; Jens Hansen; Eugene K Cha; Brian Robinson; Zhe Tian; Felix K Chun; Scott Tagawa; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Margit Fisch; Douglas S Scherr; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-07-13 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Sean McLaughlin; Jon Shephard; Eric Wallen; Susan Maygarden; Culley C Carson; Raj S Pruthi Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Hamed Ahmadi; Anirban P Mitra; George A Abdelsayed; Jie Cai; Hooman Djaladat; Harman M Bruins; Siamak Daneshmand Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-10-04 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Alexander Karl; Peter R Carroll; Jürgen E Gschwend; Ruth Knüchel; Francesco Montorsi; Christian G Stief; Urs E Studer Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-01-13 Impact factor: 20.096