Literature DB >> 24474187

Influence of co-morbidity on long-term quality of life after oesophagectomy for cancer.

T Djärv1, M Derogar, P Lagergren.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The extent to which co-morbidities affect recovery of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in long-term survivors of oesophageal cancer surgery is poorly understood.
METHODS: This was a prospective, population-based, nationwide Swedish cohort study of patients who underwent surgery for oesophageal cancer between 2001 and 2005, and were alive 5 years after operation. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-OES18 questionnaires were used to assess HRQoL up to 5 years after surgery. Eight aspects from the questionnaires were selected. Matched reference values from the Swedish general population were used as a proxy for HRQoL before presentation of the cancer. Adjusted multivariable linear mixed-effect models were used to assess mean score differences (MDs) of each HRQoL aspect in patients with or without co-morbidities.
RESULTS: Of 616 patients who underwent surgery, 153 (24·8 per cent) survived 5 years, of whom 141 (92·2 per cent) completed the questionnaires at 5 years. Among these, 79 (56·0 per cent) had co-morbidities. Patients with co-morbidity had clinically relevant (MD at least 10) and statistically significantly poorer global quality of life (MD -10, 95 per cent confidence interval -12 to -7), and more problems with dyspnoea (MD 10, 6 to 13) throughout the whole follow-up period than those without co-morbidity. Patients with co-morbidity had a clinically relevant worse level of fatigue at 6 months (MD 10, 1 to 19) and 5 years (14, 4 to 24). With regard to specific co-morbidities, only patients with diabetes reported more clinically relevant, but not statistically significant, problems with fatigue at 6 months (MD 16, 2 to 31) and 5 years (MD 13, -5 to 31) compared with patients without co-morbidity.
CONCLUSION: Among survivors of oesophageal cancer surgery, the presence of co-morbidity was associated with poor HRQoL over time and increasing symptoms of fatigue.
© 2014 BJS Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24474187     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  9 in total

1.  Quality of Life after Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Lars Lundell
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Quality of life assessment in esophagectomy patients.

Authors:  Alla Alghamedi; Gordon Buduhan; Lawrence Tan; Sadeesh Kumar Srinathan; Joanne Sulman; Gail Darling; Biniam Kidane
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

Review 3.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection and comparison to surgery for superficial esophageal squamous cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jen-Hao Yeh; Ru-Yi Huang; Ching-Tai Lee; Chih-Wen Lin; Ming-Hung Hsu; Tsung-Chin Wu; Po-Jen Hsiao; Wen-Lun Wang
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.409

4.  Health related quality of life after oesophagectomy: elderly patients refer similar eating and swallowing difficulties than younger patients.

Authors:  Francesco Cavallin; Eleonora Pinto; Luca M Saadeh; Rita Alfieri; Matteo Cagol; Carlo Castoro; Marco Scarpa
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Profiles of patient and tumour characteristics in relation to health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Poorna Anandavadivelan; Anna Wikman; Asif Johar; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Education level and health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Anna Regina Schandl; Asif Johar; Kalle Mälberg; Pernilla Lagergren
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of esophageal cancer survival, therapy response and stage.

Authors:  J M Findlay; M R Middleton; I Tomlinson
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Treatment of esophageal anastomotic leakage with self-expanding metal stents: analysis of risk factors for treatment failure.

Authors:  Saga Persson; Ioannis Rouvelas; Koshi Kumagai; Huan Song; Mats Lindblad; Lars Lundell; Magnus Nilsson; Jon A Tsai
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-03-30

9.  Two-tube method for treatment of spontaneous esophageal rupture and concomitant mediastinal infection.

Authors:  Liang-Liang Yu; Zheng-Fu He; Qi-Fang Liu; Ning Dai; Jian-Min Si; Bei Ye; Jian-Cang Zhou
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.