| Literature DB >> 24473558 |
Laura Peter1, Christoph Alexander Rüst1, Beat Knechtle1, Thomas Rosemann1, Romuald Lepers2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the changes in running performance and the sex differences between women and men in 24-hour ultra-marathons held worldwide from 1977 to 2012.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24473558 PMCID: PMC3870311 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2014(01)06
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Number of total finishers for each country, sorted by the percentage of female finishers.
| Country | Women | Men | Overall | Percentage of women |
| New Zealand | 31 | 26 | 57 | 54.4 |
| Romania | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50 |
| Ukraine | 112 | 273 | 385 | 29.1 |
| United States | 788 | 1984 | 2772 | 28.4 |
| Canada | 57 | 151 | 208 | 27.4 |
| Latvia | 21 | 58 | 79 | 26.6 |
| Great Britain | 164 | 455 | 619 | 26.5 |
| Croatia | 5 | 14 | 19 | 26.3 |
| Japan | 190 | 543 | 733 | 25.9 |
| Hungary | 76 | 223 | 299 | 25.4 |
| Serbia | 41 | 121 | 162 | 25.3 |
| Turkey | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25 |
| Macedonia | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25 |
| Suisse | 158 | 513 | 671 | 23.6 |
| Estonia | 9 | 30 | 39 | 23.1 |
| Slovenia | 5 | 17 | 22 | 22.7 |
| Denmark | 55 | 191 | 246 | 22.4 |
| Finland | 58 | 207 | 265 | 21.9 |
| South Korea | 13 | 47 | 60 | 21.7 |
| Germany | 1563 | 5722 | 7285 | 21.5 |
| Luxembourg | 3 | 11 | 14 | 21.4 |
| Uruguay | 10 | 37 | 47 | 21.3 |
| Taiwan | 59 | 223 | 282 | 20.9 |
| Italy | 200 | 767 | 967 | 20.7 |
| Sweden | 79 | 309 | 388 | 20.4 |
| Kazakhstan | 4 | 16 | 20 | 20 |
| Mexico | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20 |
| Russia | 448 | 1829 | 2277 | 19.7 |
| Brazil | 178 | 739 | 917 | 19.4 |
| Czech Republic | 111 | 461 | 572 | 19.4 |
| Australia | 80 | 378 | 458 | 17.5 |
| Argentina | 30 | 145 | 175 | 17.1 |
| Poland | 56 | 310 | 366 | 15.3 |
| France | 1403 | 8099 | 9502 | 14.8 |
| Austria | 293 | 1709 | 2002 | 14.6 |
| Spain | 44 | 316 | 360 | 12.2 |
| Belarus | 13 | 96 | 109 | 11.9 |
| Netherlands | 55 | 413 | 468 | 11.8 |
| Ireland | 5 | 54 | 59 | 8.5 |
| South Africa | 3 | 38 | 41 | 7.3 |
| Belgium | 21 | 404 | 425 | 4.9 |
| Greece | 9 | 246 | 255 | 3.5 |
| Slovakia | 5 | 152 | 157 | 3.2 |
| Portugal | 1 | 30 | 31 | 3.2 |
| Norway | 1 | 78 | 79 | 1.3 |
| Lithuania | 27 | 27 | 0 | |
| Bulgaria | 21 | 21 | 0 | |
| Algeria | 20 | 20 | 0 | |
| India | 12 | 12 | 0 | |
| Cyprus | 8 | 8 | 0 | |
| Mali | 8 | 8 | 0 | |
| Moldova | 7 | 7 | 0 | |
| Montenegro | 7 | 7 | 0 | |
| Monaco | 5 | 5 | 0 | |
| Iraq | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| Morocco | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| Somalia | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| Uzbekistan | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Chile | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Egypt | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Iran | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Iceland | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Senegal | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Singapore | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Tunisia | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 6,463 | 27,586 | 34,049 | 19 |
Figure 1Running speeds (Panel A) and sex differences (Panel B) for the fastest competitors ever.
Figure 2Changes in running speed and sex differences in running speed for the annual fastest (Panel A), the annual 10 fastest (Panel B) and the annual 100 fastest (Panel C) competitors over time.
Multi-level regression analyses for changes in running speed over time, sex differences in running and ages of finishers (Model 1), with corrections for multiple finishes (Model 2) and ages of athletes with multiple finishes (Model 3).
| Model | SE ( | Stand. | T | |||
| Running speed in men | ||||||
| Annual fastest | 1 | 0.072 | 0.012 | 0.717 | 5.911 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 0.072 | 0.012 | 0.717 | 5.911 | <0.0001 | |
| 3 | 0.075 | 0.013 | 0.747 | 5.891 | <0.0001 | |
| Annual 10 fastest | 1 | 0.066 | 0.005 | 0.630 | 14.245 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 0.066 | 0.005 | 0.630 | 14.245 | <0.0001 | |
| 3 | 0.067 | 0.005 | 0.633 | 14.344 | <0.0001 | |
| Annual 100 fastest | 1 | 0.065 | 0.002 | 0.476 | 26.510 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 0.065 | 0.002 | 0.476 | 26.510 | <0.0001 | |
| 3 | 0.066 | 0.002 | 0.483 | 27.009 | <0.0001 | |
| Running speed in women | ||||||
| Annual fastest | 1 | 0.099 | 0.026 | 0.579 | 3.826 | 0.001 |
| 2 | 0.099 | 0.026 | 0.579 | 3.826 | 0.001 | |
| 3 | 0.099 | 0.027 | 0.578 | 3.739 | 0.001 | |
| Annual 10 fastest | 1 | 0.102 | 0.007 | 0.678 | 15.101 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 0.102 | 0.007 | 0.678 | 15.101 | <0.0001 | |
| 3 | 0.103 | 0.007 | 0.685 | 15.225 | <0.0001 | |
| Annual 100 fastest | 1 | 0.150 | 0.007 | 0.516 | 22.524 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | 0.150 | 0.007 | 0.516 | 22.524 | <0.0001 | |
| 3 | 0.150 | 0.007 | 0.516 | 22.497 | <0.0001 | |
| Sex difference in running speed | ||||||
| Annual fastest | 1 | -0.600 | 0.256 | -0.399 | -2.343 | 0.026 |
| 2 | -0.600 | 0.256 | -0.399 | -2.343 | 0.026 | |
| Annual 10 fastest | 1 | -0.759 | 0.056 | -0.639 | -13.612 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | -0.759 | 0.056 | -0.639 | -13.612 | <0.0001 | |
| Annual 100 fastest | 1 | -1.139 | 0.040 | -0.602 | -28.174 | <0.0001 |
| 2 | -1.139 | 0.040 | -0.602 | -28.174 | <0.0001 | |
| Age in men | ||||||
| Annual fastest | 1 | 0.071 | 0.023 | 0.063 | 3.077 | 0.002 |
| 2 | 0.071 | 0.023 | 0.063 | 3.077 | 0.002 | |
| Annual 10 fastest | 1 | 0.023 | 0.045 | 0.030 | 0.518 | 0.605 |
| 2 | 0.023 | 0.045 | 0.030 | 0.518 | 0.605 | |
| Annual 100 fastest | 1 | 0.193 | 0.118 | 0.275 | 1.642 | 0.110 |
| 2 | 0.193 | 0.118 | 0.275 | 1.642 | 0.110 | |
| Age in women | ||||||
| Annual fastest | 1 | -0.058 | 0.124 | -0.086 | -0.465 | 0.645 |
| 2 | -0.058 | 0.124 | -0.086 | -0.465 | 0.645 | |
| Annual 10 fastest | 1 | -0.087 | 0.052 | -0.103 | -1.693 | 0.092 |
| 2 | -0.087 | 0.052 | -0.103 | -1.693 | 0.092 | |
| Annual 100 fastest | 1 | 0.048 | 0.050 | 0.026 | 0.959 | 0.338 |
| 2 | 0.048 | 0.050 | 0.026 | 0.959 | 0.338 | |
Figure 3Differences in running speed between the 1st and the 10th place finishers (Panel A) and between the 1st and the 100th place finishers (Panel B) expressed as percentages of the winning times for both women and men.
Figure 4Changes in the ages of peak running speed for the annual fastest (Panel A), the annual 10 fastest (Panel B) and the annual 100 fastest (Panel C) competitors over time.