Ellen W Freeman1, Mary D Sammel, Richard J Sanders. 1. From the Departments of 1Obstetrics and Gynecology and 2Psychiatry, and Centers for 3Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics and 4Research in Reproduction and Women's Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the risk of hot flashes relative to natural menopause and to evaluate the associations of hormone levels, behavioral variables, and demographic variables with the risk of hot flashes after menopause. METHODS: We performed annual assessment of 255 women who were premenopausal at baseline and reached natural menopause within 16 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of moderate/severe hot flashes increased in each premenopausal year, reaching a peak of 46% in the first 2 years after the final menstrual period (FMP). Hot flashes decreased slowly after menopause and did not return to premenopausal levels until 9 years after the FMP. The mean (SD) duration of moderate/severe hot flashes after the FMP was 4.6 (2.9) years (for any hot flashes, 4.9 [3.1] y). One third of women at 10 years or more after menopause continued to experience moderate/severe hot flashes. African-American women (obese and nonobese) and obese white women had significantly greater risks of hot flashes compared with nonobese white women (interaction, P = 0.01). In multivariable analysis, increasing follicle-stimulating hormone levels before the FMP (P < 0.001), decreasing estradiol (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96; P = 0.008), and increasing anxiety (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06; P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for hot flashes, whereas higher education levels were protective (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.91; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate/severe hot flashes continue, on average, for nearly 5 years after menopause; more than one third of women observed for 10 years or more after menopause have moderate/severe hot flashes. Continuation of hot flashes for more than 5 years after menopause underscores the importance of determining individual risks/benefits when selecting hormone or nonhormone therapy for menopausal symptoms.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the risk of hot flashes relative to natural menopause and to evaluate the associations of hormone levels, behavioral variables, and demographic variables with the risk of hot flashes after menopause. METHODS: We performed annual assessment of 255 women who were premenopausal at baseline and reached natural menopause within 16 years of follow-up. RESULTS: The prevalence of moderate/severe hot flashes increased in each premenopausal year, reaching a peak of 46% in the first 2 years after the final menstrual period (FMP). Hot flashes decreased slowly after menopause and did not return to premenopausal levels until 9 years after the FMP. The mean (SD) duration of moderate/severe hot flashes after the FMP was 4.6 (2.9) years (for any hot flashes, 4.9 [3.1] y). One third of women at 10 years or more after menopause continued to experience moderate/severe hot flashes. African-American women (obese and nonobese) and obese white women had significantly greater risks of hot flashes compared with nonobese white women (interaction, P = 0.01). In multivariable analysis, increasing follicle-stimulating hormone levels before the FMP (P < 0.001), decreasing estradiol (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.96; P = 0.008), and increasing anxiety (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.06; P < 0.001) were significant risk factors for hot flashes, whereas higher education levels were protective (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47-0.91; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate/severe hot flashes continue, on average, for nearly 5 years after menopause; more than one third of women observed for 10 years or more after menopause have moderate/severe hot flashes. Continuation of hot flashes for more than 5 years after menopause underscores the importance of determining individual risks/benefits when selecting hormone or nonhormone therapy for menopausal symptoms.
Authors: H G Burger; E C Dudley; J L Hopper; N Groome; J R Guthrie; A Green; L Dennerstein Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: John F Randolph; MaryFran Sowers; Irina V Bondarenko; Siobán D Harlow; Judith L Luborsky; Roderick J Little Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: JoAnn E Manson; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marcia L Stefanick; Aaron K Aragaki; Jacques E Rossouw; Ross L Prentice; Garnet Anderson; Barbara V Howard; Cynthia A Thomson; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Rebecca D Jackson; Marian Limacher; Karen L Margolis; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Shirley A Beresford; Jane A Cauley; Charles B Eaton; Margery Gass; Judith Hsia; Karen C Johnson; Charles Kooperberg; Lewis H Kuller; Cora E Lewis; Simin Liu; Lisa W Martin; Judith K Ockene; Mary Jo O'Sullivan; Lynda H Powell; Michael S Simon; Linda Van Horn; Mara Z Vitolins; Robert B Wallace Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Lisa Gallicchio; Susan R Miller; Judith Kiefer; Teresa Greene; Howard A Zacur; Jodi A Flaws Journal: Menopause Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Nancy E Avis; Sybil L Crawford; Gail Greendale; Joyce T Bromberger; Susan A Everson-Rose; Ellen B Gold; Rachel Hess; Hadine Joffe; Howard M Kravitz; Ping G Tepper; Rebecca C Thurston Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Kunal C Kadakia; Charles L Loprinzi; Pamela J Atherton; Kelliann C Fee-Schroeder; Amit Sood; Debra L Barton Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Annlouise R Assaf; Andrew G Bushmakin; Nina Joyce; Michael J Louie; Michael Flores; Margaret Moffatt Journal: Am Health Drug Benefits Date: 2017-09