Konstantinos C Koskinas1, Nikolaos Fragakis2, Demosthenes Katritsis3, Vassileios Skeberis2, Vassileios Vassilikos2. 1. Third Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, 49 Konstantinoupoleos Street, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece kckoskinas@gmail.com. 2. Third Cardiology Department, Hippokrateion Hospital, Aristotle University Medical School, 49 Konstantinoupoleos Street, 546 42 Thessaloniki, Greece. 3. Cardiology Department, Athens Euroclinic, 11521 Athens, Greece.
Abstract
AIMS: Amiodarone is used commonly for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is limited by moderate efficacy and delayed action. Ranolazine and amiodarone are markedly synergistic in suppressing experimental AF in vitro, yet the clinical efficacy of ranolazine combined with amiodarone for AF conversion has only undergone minimal investigation. This prospective, single-blinded, randomized study compared the safety and efficacy of ranolazine added to amiodarone vs. amiodarone alone for conversion of recent-onset AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enroled 121 patients (64 ± 10 years, 45% male) with recent-onset (<48 h duration) AF who were eligible for pharmacological cardioversion. Patients received either 24 h amiodarone infusion (loading dose 5 mg/kg followed by maintenance dose of 50 mg/h; n = 60), or amiodarone infusion at the same dosage plus a single oral dose of ranolazine 1500 mg (n = 61). Patients in the amiodarone plus ranolazine group compared with the amiodarone-only group showed significantly higher conversion rates at 24 h (87 vs. 70%, respectively; P = 0.024) and at 12 h (52 vs. 32%; P = 0.021), and shorter time to conversion (10.2 ± 3.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.1 h; P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis identified higher 24 h conversion in patients with left atrial (LA) diameter >46 mm who received the combination treatment vs. amiodarone alone (81 vs. 54%; P = 0.02), whereas the efficacy of the two interventions did not differ among patients with LA diameter ≤46 mm (P = 0.77). There was modest QT prolongation in both the groups, no serious adverse reactions, and no pro-arrhythmic events. CONCLUSION: Addition of ranolazine to amiodarone was safe and well tolerated in this study, and it demonstrated efficacy superior to amiodarone alone for conversion of recent-onset AF. These findings may have clinical implications by offering a simple therapeutic manoeuvre to enhance amiodarone's effectiveness for conversion of AF. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Amiodarone is used commonly for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is limited by moderate efficacy and delayed action. Ranolazine and amiodarone are markedly synergistic in suppressing experimental AF in vitro, yet the clinical efficacy of ranolazine combined with amiodarone for AF conversion has only undergone minimal investigation. This prospective, single-blinded, randomized study compared the safety and efficacy of ranolazine added to amiodarone vs. amiodarone alone for conversion of recent-onset AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enroled 121 patients (64 ± 10 years, 45% male) with recent-onset (<48 h duration) AF who were eligible for pharmacological cardioversion. Patients received either 24 h amiodarone infusion (loading dose 5 mg/kg followed by maintenance dose of 50 mg/h; n = 60), or amiodarone infusion at the same dosage plus a single oral dose of ranolazine 1500 mg (n = 61). Patients in the amiodarone plus ranolazine group compared with the amiodarone-only group showed significantly higher conversion rates at 24 h (87 vs. 70%, respectively; P = 0.024) and at 12 h (52 vs. 32%; P = 0.021), and shorter time to conversion (10.2 ± 3.3 vs. 13.3 ± 4.1 h; P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis identified higher 24 h conversion in patients with left atrial (LA) diameter >46 mm who received the combination treatment vs. amiodarone alone (81 vs. 54%; P = 0.02), whereas the efficacy of the two interventions did not differ among patients with LA diameter ≤46 mm (P = 0.77). There was modest QT prolongation in both the groups, no serious adverse reactions, and no pro-arrhythmic events. CONCLUSION: Addition of ranolazine to amiodarone was safe and well tolerated in this study, and it demonstrated efficacy superior to amiodarone alone for conversion of recent-onset AF. These findings may have clinical implications by offering a simple therapeutic manoeuvre to enhance amiodarone's effectiveness for conversion of AF. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
Authors: Haibo Ni; Dominic G Whittaker; Wei Wang; Wayne R Giles; Sanjiv M Narayan; Henggui Zhang Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 4.566